<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimoconcept</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Концепт: философия, религия, культура</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Concept: philosophy, religion, culture</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-8831</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-0540</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МГИМО</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/2541-8831-2019-3-11-27-38</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimoconcept-258</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ФИЛОСОФИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLES. PHILOSOPHY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>МЕТАФОРА КОСМОСА-ПОЛИСА В СТОИЧЕСКОМ УЧЕНИИ И ЕЁ ЭТИКО-КОММУНИКАТИВНЫЕ СЛЕДСТВИЯ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>METAPHOR OF COSMOS–AS–POLIS IN THE STOIC TEACHING AND ITS ETHICAL AND COMMUNICATIVE CONSEQUENCES</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Щербаков</surname><given-names>Ф. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shcherbakov</surname><given-names>F. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Щербаков Фёдор Борисович – аспирант кафедры философии, богословия и религиоведения.</p><p>г. Санкт-Петербург, 197198, ул. Съезжинская, д. 11, кв. 10</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Shcherbakov Fedor Borisovitch – graduate student of the Department of philosophy, theology and religion studies.</p><p>15 Fontankaquay, Saint-Petersburg, 191011, Russia</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">fkrylov@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Русская Христианская Гуманитарная Академия</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>The Russian Christian Academy of Humanities</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>11</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>27</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Щербаков Ф.Б., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Щербаков Ф.Б.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Shcherbakov F.B.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/258">https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/258</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматриваются истоки стоического представления о Космосе как Вселенском государстве, прослеживаются его предпосылки, исходящие из специфики первобытного мифопоэтического мышления. Обосновывается тезис, что метафора Космоса-Полиса возникла из поиска ранними греческими мыслителями адекватного философского языка и составляет один из важнейших метафорических кодов в античной поэтике – социоморфный, на базе которого возникли учения о государстве у Платона и стоиков.</p><p>В статье анализируются противоречия в этическом учении стоиков в контексте социоморфного метафорического кода и предлагается попытка их разрешения через выделение «горизонтально» - гражданских и «вертикально» -божественных коммуникативных связей в стоическом учении, образовывавших своеобразную двойную систему коммуникации с Космосом.</p><p>Такое представление о мире, фундированное и одновременно выражаемое в образе Космополиса, как бы призывало к “мировой общительности”, “отзывчивости” стоического мудреца на каждое проявление божественного Логоса-Разума. Оно скрепляло имеющиеся этические противоречия между отдельными представителями этой школы, поддерживало цельность учения, не давая забывать главное: все мы живём in urbem dishominisque communem (Sen. Ad Marc. 18,1) и в любом случае должны делать всё для процветания Мирового Государства: – вне зависимости от того, мудрец ты или только желаешь причаститься к тайнам стоической мудрости.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article is considering origins of Stoic representation of Cosmos as The Universe State and there is briefly tracing its totemistic preconditions, which were proceeding from the primitive mythopoetic thinking’s specifics. Furthermore, there is proving a thesis about that the metaphor of Cosmos-Polis has emerged from searchings of an adequate philosophical language by early Greek thinkers, and that sociomorphical code was one of the most important metaphorical models of Cosmos in ancient philosophical poetics, not only for Stoics. A great number of political doctrines by Plato and faraway in the postplatonic tradition, including Stoa, were arising on the fundament of the this code. There is considering character of some Stoic ethical contradictions and is offering an attempt of resolving them through allocation of horizontically-civil and vertically-divine links in the Stoic teaching, which were containing peculiar dual system of communication of stoic sage with Cosmos.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Зенон</kwd><kwd>Клеанф</kwd><kwd>Космополис</kwd><kwd>Марк Аврелий</kwd><kwd>Сенека</kwd><kwd>тотемизм</kwd><kwd>Фрейденберг О.М.</kwd><kwd>Хрисипп</kwd><kwd>Эпиктет</kwd><kwd>этика стоиков</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Chrysippus</kwd><kwd>Cleanthes</kwd><kwd>Cosmopolis</kwd><kwd>Marcus Aurelius</kwd><kwd>O.M. Freidenberg</kwd><kwd>Seneca</kwd><kwd>the Stoic ethics</kwd><kwd>totemism</kwd><kwd>Zeno</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аристотель. Сочинения: в 4 тт. (Серия «Философское наследие»). М.: Мысль, Т. 1 - 1976. 550 с.; Т. 2 – 1978. 687 с.; Т. 3 – 1981. 613 с.; Т. 4 – 1983. 830 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aristotel’. Sochineniia: v 4 tt. (Seriia «Filosofskoe nasledie») [Works: in 4 vols. (Series «Philosophical Heritage»)]. Moscow, Thought, T. 1 - 1976. 550 p.; T. 2 - 1978. 687 p.; T. 3 - 1981. 613 p.; T. 4 - 1983. 830 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Беседы Эпиктета / Перевод с древнегреч. Г.А. Тароняна. М.: Ладомир, 1997. 312 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Besedy Epikteta [Conversations of Epictetus] / Translation from Ancient Greek. G.A. Taronyan. Moscow, Ladomir, 1997. 312 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бровкин В.В. Ранние стоики: космополитическая доктрина и политическая практика // Вестн. Новосиб. гос. ун-та. Серия: Философия. 2014. Том 12. Выпуск 3. С. 154-161.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brovkin V.V. Rannie stoiki: kosmopoliticheskaia doktrina i politicheskaia praktika [The early Stoics: Kosmopolitic Doctrine and Politic Practice]. Vestn. Novosib. gos. un-ta. Seriia: Filosofiia - Bulletin of Novosib. state University. Series: Philosophy, 2014, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp. 154-161 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Васильева Т.В. Поэтика античной философии. М.: Академический Проект; Трикста, 2008. 735 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vasil’eva T.V. Poetika antichnoi filosofii [Poetics of Ancient Philosophy]. Moscow, Academic Project; Triksta, 2008. 735 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Древнегреческая литературная критика / Под ред. Л. А. Фрейберг. М.: Наука, 1975. 480 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Drevnegrecheskaia literaturnaia kritika [Ancient Greek’s Critics of Literature] / Ed. L.A. Freiberg. Moscow, Science, 1975. 480 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лебедев А.В. Греческая философия как реформа языка // Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология - XIV (Чтения памяти проф. И.М. Тронского): Материалы международной конференции. СПб., 2009. С. 359-368.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lebedev A.V. Grecheskaia filosofiia kak reforma iazyka [Greek Philosophy as a Reform of Language]. Indoevropeiskoe iazykoznanie i klassicheskaia filologiia - XIV (Chteniia pamiati prof. I.M. Tronskogo): Materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii [Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology - XIV (Readings in Memory of Prof. I.M. Tronsky): Materials of an international conference]. Saint-Petersburg, 2009, pp. 359-368 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лебедев А.В. Логос Гераклита: реконструкция мысли и слова. СПб.: Наука, 2014. 533 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lebedev A.V. Logos Geraklita: rekonstruktsiia mysli i slova [Logos of Heraclitus: Reconstruction of his Thought and Word]. Saint-Petersburg, Science, 2014. 533 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мелетинский Е.М. Поэтика мифа. М.: Академический проект, 2012. 331 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meletinskii E.M. Poetika mifa [Poetics of Myth]. Moscow, Academic Project, 2012. 331 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Поленц М. Стоя. История духовного движения / Перевод с нем. В.М. Линейкина. СПб.: Quadrivium, 2015. 1040 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polents M. Stoia. Istoriia dukhovnogo dvizheniia [Stoa. The History of the Spiritual Movement] / Translation from German V.M. Lineikina. Saint-Petersburg, Quadrivium, 2015. 1040 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Римские стоики: Сенека, Эпиктет, Марк Аврелий / Сост. текста В.В. Сапов. М.: Республика, 1995. 463 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rimskie stoiki: Seneka, Epiktet, Mark Avrelii [The Roman Stoics: Seneca, Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius] / Comp. text V.V. Sapov. Moscow, Republic, 1995. 463 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Светлов Р.В. Иов, Плотин, Платон // Вестник Русской христианской гуманитарной академии. 2015. № 3. С.137-147.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Svetlov R.V. Iov, Plotin, Platon [Job, Plotinus, Plato]. Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii - Bulletin of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy, 2015, no. 3, pp. 137-147 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сенека Луций Анней. Философские трактаты / Перевод с латинского Т.Ю. Бородай. СПб.: Алетейя, 2017. 398 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Seneka Lutsii Annei. Filosofskie traktaty [Philosophical Treatises] / Translation from Latin T.Yu. Bearded. Saint-Petersburg, Aleteya, 2017. 398 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Столяров А.А. Стоя и стоицизм. М.: АО КАМИ ГРУП, 1995. 441 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stoliarov A.A. Stoia i stoitsizm [Stoa and Stoicism]. Moscow, AO KAMI GRUP, 1995. 441 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фрагменты ранних стоиков. Том I: Зенон и его ученики / Перевод и комментарии А.А. Столярова. М.: ГЛК, 1998. 229 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fragmenty rannikh stoikov. Tom I: Zenon i ego ucheniki [Fragments of the early Stoics. Vol. I: Zeno and his disciples] / Translation and comments by A.A. Stolyarova. Moscow, GLK, 1998. 229 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Франкфорт Г., Франкфорт Г.А., Уилсон Дж.А., Якобсен Т. Духовные искания древнего человека: в преддверии философии / Перевод с англ. Т.Н. Толстой. СПб.: Амфора, 2016. 287 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Frankfort G., Frankfort G.A., Uilson Dzh.A., Iakobsen T. Dukhovnye iskaniia drevnego cheloveka: v preddverii filosofii [Before Philosophy. The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man] / Translation from English. T.N. Tolstoy. Saint-Petersburg, Amphora, 2016. 287 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фрейденберг О.М. Поэтика сюжета и жанра. М.: Лабиринт, 1997. 448 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Freidenberg O.M. Poetika siuzheta i zhanra [Poetics of Plot and Genre]. Moscow, Labyrinth, 1997. 448 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фрейденберг О.М. Миф и литература древности. М.: Наука, 1978. 605 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Freidenberg O.M. Mif i literatura drevnosti [Myth and Literature of Antiquity]. Moscow, Science, 1978. 605 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Целлер Э. Очерк истории греческой философии / Перевод с нем. С.Л. Франка. СПб.: Алетейя, 1996. 294 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tseller E. Ocherk istorii grecheskoi filosofii [Essay of the Ancient Greek History] / Translation from German S.L. Frank. Saint-Petersburg, Aleteya, 1996. 294 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шахнович М.М. Филодем о гневе // Общество: философия, история, культура. 2018. №12. С. 31-34.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shakhnovich M.M. Filodem o gneve [Philodemus on Anger]. Obshchestvo: filosofiia, istoriia, kul’tura – Society: philosophy, history, culture, 2018, no. 12, pp. 31-34 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шеллинг Ф.В. Философия искусства / Пер. с нем. П.С. Попова. М.: Мысль, 1999. 607 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shelling F.V. Filosofiia iskusstva [Philosophy of Art] / Translation from German. P.S. Popov. Moscow, Thought, 1999. 607 p. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lloyd G.E.R. Polarity and Analogy. Two types of argumentation in early Greek thought. Cambridge: University Press, 1966. 503 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lloyd G.E.R. Polarity and Analogy. Two types of argumentation in early Greek thought. Cambridge, University Press, 1966. 503 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ramelli I. The Philosophical Stance of Allegory in Stoicism and its Reception in Platonism, Pagan and Christian: Origen in Dialogue with the Stoics and Plato // International Journal of the Classical Tradition. 2011. Vol. 18. № 3. P. 335-371.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ramelli I. The Philosophical Stance of Allegory in Stoicism and its Reception in Platonism, Pagan and Christian: Origen in Dialogue with the Stoics and Plato. International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 2011, Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 335-371.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Seneca. De Otio. Available at: http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/sen/sen.otio.shtml (accessed 3 March 2019).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Seneca. De Otio. Available at: http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/sen/sen.otio.shtml (accessed 3 March 2019).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vogt K.M. Law, Reason, and the Cosmic Sity. Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. Oxford: University Press, 2008. 239 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vogt K.M. Law, Reason, and the Cosmic Sity. Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. Oxford, University Press, 2008. 239 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
