mgimoconceptКонцепт: философия, религия, культураConcept: philosophy, religion, culture2541-88312619-0540МГИМО10.24833/2541-8831-2020-1-13-105-120mgimoconcept-359Research ArticleРЕЛИГИОВЕДЕНИЕRESEARCH ARTICLES. RELIGIOUS STUDIESРитуалы в дискурсах цифрового православия: методология и направления исследованияRituals in Discourses of Digital Orthodox Christianity: Methodology and Research TrendsОстровскаяЕ. А.OstrovskayaE. A.

Островская Елена Александровна – доктор социологических наук, профессор кафедры теории и истории социологии

191124, Санкт-Петербург, ул. Смольного, 1/3, 9-й подъезд

Elena A. Ostrovskaya – Doctor of Sciences (Sociology), Professor, Department of Sociology

191124, Saint-Petersburg, Smolnogo str., 1/3, 9 entrance

e.ostrovskaya@spbu.ruСПбГУРоссияSaint-Petersburg State UniversityRussian Federation20200707202041105120Copyright © Островская Е.А., 20202020Островская Е.А.Ostrovskaya E.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/359

В реалиях нового тысячелетия трансцендентное банализировано – в любой момент пользователь web 2.0 может оказаться в медитативном пространстве буддийского ритуала построения песочной мандалы или заказать себе молебен в одном из православных храмов мира. Интернет и новые медиа технологии предоставляют возможность для размещения и хранения данных, доступ к которым потенциально возможен для многих. Священные тексты различных религиозных традиций, ритуалы и практические инструкции к ним, литургии, молебны, магические формулы и прочее не являются больше достоянием лишь узкого круга харизматических профессионалов. И это само по себе ставит перед любым пользователем такой информации и таких практик вопрос об аутентичности и авторитете. Являются ли подлинными и заслуживающими доверия обнаруживаемые онлайн ритуальные практики, оцифрованные священные и учительские тексты, символические изображения, иконы, танки, влоги с подробными инструкциями о правилах молитв по соглашению или онлайн коллективных пуджах? И, если адепт той или иной религии офлайн авторитет, которому может быть переадресован этот вопрос, то что делать неофиту, интересующемуся или исследователю религий? В фокусе рассмотрения настоящей статьи методология изучения цифровых дискурсов православия об эпистемическом авторитете и легитимности онлайн ритуалов. Автор подробно анализирует ключевые концепции междисциплинарного исследовательского поля digitalstudies. Детальному разбору подвергнуты типология онлайн религиозных эпистемических авторитетов Х. Кэмпбелл, концепция «стратегического арбитража» П.Х. Чон и концепция «религиозного цифрового третьего пространства» С. Хувера и Н. Аш-Шейби. Особый интерес представляют результаты проведенного автором зондажного онлайн исследования православных онлайн практик и цифровых дискурсов вокруг них. В качестве итогового аккорда статья предлагает конкретные перспектив ные направления онлайн исследований цифровых православных дискурсов православия. В качестве таковых рассмотрены повествовательные практики блогеров-теологов и тео-блогеров, стратегический арбитраж блогеров-теологов относительно эпистемического авторитета репертуара вариаций практики «молитвы по соглашению» на цифровых платформах православной социальной сети «Елицы» и мобильного приложения «Молитва по соглашению» и, наконец, гибридное цифровое предложение по ритуалам и практикам сети «Елицы. Записки».

In the realities of the millennium the transcendent is banalized – at any moment the user of web 2.0 can find himself in the meditation space of the Buddhist ritual of building a sand mandala or order a moleben in one of the Orthodox churches of the world. The Internet and new media technologies provide an opportunity to host and store data that is potentially accessible to many people. Sacred texts of various religious traditions, rituals and practical instructions to them, liturgies, molebens, magic formulas and so on, are no longer the domain of a narrow circle of charismatic professionals. And that in itself raises the question of authenticity and authority to any user of such information and practices. Are genuine and credible online ritual practices, digitized sacred and teacher texts, symbolic images, icons, tanks, vlogs with detailed instructions on the rules of prayers by agreement or online collective pujas? And, if the adept of the religion is an offline authority to which this question may be forwarded, what should do a neophyte, an interested person or a researcher of religions? The focus of the article is the methodology of studying digital discourse of Orthodoxy concerning the epistemic authority and the legitimacy of online rituals. The author analyzes in detail the key concepts of digital studies interdisciplinary research field. The typology of online religious epistemic authorities by H. Kempbell, the concept of «strategic arbitration» by P.H. Chon and the concept of «religious digital third space» by S. Huve and N.Ash-Sheibiare examined in depth. The results of the author’s probing online study of the Orthodox online practices and digital discourse around them are of particular interest. As a final chord, the article offers specific promising directions of online research of digital Orthodox discourse of Orthodoxy. As such, the paper presents the narrative practices of theological bloggers and theo bloggers, the strategic arbitration of theological bloggers regarding the epistemic authority of the repertoire of variations of the practice of «prayer by agreement» on the digital platforms of the Orthodox social network «Elica» and the mobile application «Prayer by Agreement» and, finally, the hybrid digital proposal on rituals and practices of the network «Elica», «Notes».

цифровая религиямедиатизация православияцифровой православный ритуалправославные цифровые дискурсыdigital religionmediatization of Orthodoxydigital orthodox ritualorthodox digital discourseReferencesAnderson J. 1999. The Internet and Islam’s new interpreters. D.F. Eickleman (Ed.). New media in the Muslim world: The emerging public sphere. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. P. 41-55.Anderson J. 1999. The Internet and Islam’s new interpreters. D.F. Eickleman (Ed.). New media in the Muslim world: The emerging public sphere. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. P. 41-55.Campbell H.A. 2006. Religion and the Internet. Communication Research Trends. 25 (1). P. 4-6.Campbell H.A. 2006. Religion and the Internet. Communication Research Trends. 25 (1). P. 4-6.Campbell H.A. 2010. When religion meets new media. London: Routledge. 232 p.Campbell H.A. 2010. When religion meets new media. London: Routledge. 232 p.Campbell H. (Ed.) 2013. Digital Religion: understanding religious practice in new media worlds. New York: Routledge. 276 p.Campbell H. (Ed.) 2013. Digital Religion: understanding religious practice in new media worlds. New York: Routledge. 276 p.Campbell H.A. (Ed.). 2015. Digital Judaism: Jewish Negotiations with Digital Media and Culture. New York, London: Routledge. 213 p.Campbell H.A. (Ed.). 2015. Digital Judaism: Jewish Negotiations with Digital Media and Culture. New York, London: Routledge. 213 p.Campbell H.A. 2016. Framing the human-technology relationship: How Religious Digital Creatives engage posthuman narratives. Social Compass. 63 (3). P. 302-318.Campbell H.A. 2016. Framing the human-technology relationship: How Religious Digital Creatives engage posthuman narratives. Social Compass. 63 (3). P. 302-318.Campbell H.A., Golan O. 2011. Creating digital enclaves: Negotiation of the Internet among bounded religious communities. Media, Culture & Society. 33 (5). P. 709-724.Campbell H.A., Golan O. 2011. Creating digital enclaves: Negotiation of the Internet among bounded religious communities. Media, Culture & Society. 33 (5). P. 709-724.Cantoni L., Rapetti E., Tardini S., Vannini S., Arasa, D. 2012. Picture: the Adoption of ICT by Catholic Priests. Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices, Futures. Ed. by P.H. Cheong, P. Fischer-Nielsen, S. Gelfgren, C. Ess. New York: Peter Lang. P. 131-149.Cantoni L., Rapetti E., Tardini S., Vannini S., Arasa, D. 2012. Picture: the Adoption of ICT by Catholic Priests. Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices, Futures. Ed. by P.H. Cheong, P. Fischer-Nielsen, S. Gelfgren, C. Ess. New York: Peter Lang. P. 131-149.Cheong P.H. 2013. Authority. Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Ed. by H.A. Campbell. Abingdon, England; New York: Routledge. P. 72-87.Cheong P.H. 2013. Authority. Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Ed. by H.A. Campbell. Abingdon, England; New York: Routledge. P. 72-87.Cheong P.H. 2014. Tweet the message? Religious authority and social media innovation. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture. 3 (3). P. 1-19.Cheong P.H. 2014. Tweet the message? Religious authority and social media innovation. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture. 3 (3). P. 1-19.Cheong P.H. 2017. The vitality of new media and religion: Communicative perspectives, practices, and changing authority in spiritual organization. New media & Society. 19 (1). P. 25-33.Cheong P.H. 2017. The vitality of new media and religion: Communicative perspectives, practices, and changing authority in spiritual organization. New media & Society. 19 (1). P. 25-33.Cheong P.H., Huang S., Poon J. 2011. Religious Communication and Epistemic Authority of Leaders in Wired Faith Organizations. Journal of Communication. 61 (5). P. 938-958.Cheong P.H., Huang S., Poon J. 2011. Religious Communication and Epistemic Authority of Leaders in Wired Faith Organizations. Journal of Communication. 61 (5). P. 938-958.Cheong P. H., Ess C. 2012. Religion 2.0? Relational and hybridizing pathways in religion, social media and culture. Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices, Futures. Ed. by Cheong P.H., FischerNielsen P, Gelfgren S, et al. New York: Peter Lang. P. 1-24.Cheong P. H., Ess C. 2012. Religion 2.0? Relational and hybridizing pathways in religion, social media and culture. Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices, Futures. Ed. by Cheong P.H., FischerNielsen P, Gelfgren S, et al. New York: Peter Lang. P. 1-24.Couldry N, Hepp A. 2016. The Mediated Construction of Reality: Society, culture, mediatization. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press. 256 p.Couldry N, Hepp A. 2016. The Mediated Construction of Reality: Society, culture, mediatization. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press. 256 p.Dawson L., Cowan D. 2004. Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet. New York: Routledge. 288 p.Dawson L., Cowan D. 2004. Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet. New York: Routledge. 288 p.Evolvi G. 2017. Hybrid Muslim identities in digital space: The Italian blog Yalla. Social Compass. 62 (1). P. 43-60.Evolvi G. 2017. Hybrid Muslim identities in digital space: The Italian blog Yalla. Social Compass. 62 (1). P. 43-60.Hoover S., Echchaibi N. (Eds.). 2012. The third spaces of digital religion: A working paper. Unpublished working paper. Centre for Media, Religion, and Culture. University of Colorado. Boudler. CO.Hoover S., Echchaibi N. (Eds.). 2012. The third spaces of digital religion: A working paper. Unpublished working paper. Centre for Media, Religion, and Culture. University of Colorado. Boudler. CO.Hoover S.M. 2013. Concluding thoughts. Imagining the religious in and through the digital. Campbell H. (Ed.) Digital Religion: understanding religious practice in new media worlds. New York: Routledge. P. 104-118.Hoover S.M. 2013. Concluding thoughts. Imagining the religious in and through the digital. Campbell H. (Ed.) Digital Religion: understanding religious practice in new media worlds. New York: Routledge. P. 104-118.Hoover S.M., Echchaibi N. 2014. Media theory and the «third spaces» of digital religion. Working paper. Center for Media, Religion, and Culture. 35 р. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3315.4641Hoover S.M., Echchaibi N. 2014. Media theory and the «third spaces» of digital religion. Working paper. Center for Media, Religion, and Culture. 35 р. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3315.4641Golan O., Stadler N. 2016. Building the sacred community online: The dual use of the Internet by Chabad. Media, Culture & Society. 38 (1). P. 71-88.Golan O., Stadler N. 2016. Building the sacred community online: The dual use of the Internet by Chabad. Media, Culture & Society. 38 (1). P. 71-88.Golan O., Martini M. 2018. Digital pilgrimage: Exploring Catholic monastic webcasts. The Communication Review. 21 (1). P. 24-45.Golan O., Martini M. 2018. Digital pilgrimage: Exploring Catholic monastic webcasts. The Communication Review. 21 (1). P. 24-45.Hutchings T. 2017. Creating church online: Ritual, community and new media (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. 264 p.Hutchings T. 2017. Creating church online: Ritual, community and new media (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. 264 p.Kołodziejska 2018. Online Catholic Communities: Community, Authority, and Religious Individulisation. New York: Routledge. 142 p.Kołodziejska 2018. Online Catholic Communities: Community, Authority, and Religious Individulisation. New York: Routledge. 142 p.Lövheim M. 2013. Identity. Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Ed. by H. Campbell. Routledge: Abingdon, England; New York. P. 41-56.Lövheim M. 2013. Identity. Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Ed. by H. Campbell. Routledge: Abingdon, England; New York. P. 41-56.The Body of Christ Online: The Russian Orthodox Church and (Non-) Liturgical Interactivity on the Internet. Rheingold H. 1993. The Virtual Community. New York: Harper. 480 p.The Body of Christ Online: The Russian Orthodox Church and (Non-) Liturgical Interactivity on the Internet. Rheingold H. 1993. The Virtual Community. New York: Harper. 480 p.Suslov M. 2015. The Medium for Demonic Energies: «Digital Anxiety» in the Russian Orthodox Church. Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media. № 14. Р. 1-25.Suslov M. 2015. The Medium for Demonic Energies: «Digital Anxiety» in the Russian Orthodox Church. Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media. № 14. Р. 1-25.Suslov M. (Ed.). 2016. Digital Orthodoxy in the Post-Soviet World. The Russian Orthodox Church and Web 2.0. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag. 350 p.Suslov M. (Ed.). 2016. Digital Orthodoxy in the Post-Soviet World. The Russian Orthodox Church and Web 2.0. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag. 350 p.Zaleski J. 1997. The Soul of Cyberspace: How Technology is Changing Our Spiritual Lives. San Francisco: HarperEdge. 284 p.Zaleski J. 1997. The Soul of Cyberspace: How Technology is Changing Our Spiritual Lives. San Francisco: HarperEdge. 284 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.