<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimoconcept</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Концепт: философия, религия, культура</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Concept: philosophy, religion, culture</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-8831</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-0540</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МГИМО</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-7-18</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimoconcept-405</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ФИЛОСОФИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLES. PHILOSOPHY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Танабэ Хадзимэ: Философия как путь покаяния</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Tanabe Hajime: Philosophy as a Path of Repentance</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Карелова</surname><given-names>Л. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Karelova</surname><given-names>L. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Карелова Любовь Борисовна — кандидат философских наук, старший научный сотрудник</p><p>109240, Москва, ул. Гончарная, 12, стр. 1</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Liubov B. Karelova — PhD in Philosophy, Senior Research Fellow</p><p>109240, Moscow, Goncharnaya str., 12/1</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">lbkarelova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт философии РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>09</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>7</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Карелова Л.Б., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Карелова Л.Б.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Karelova L.B.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/405">https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/405</self-uri><abstract><p>Книга «Философия как путь покаяния» японского философа Танабэ Хадзимэ, написанная в последний год Второй мировой войны, знаменует собой важный поворотный момент в творчестве мыслителя. Анализ её основных идей представляет интерес с точки зрения влияния исторических событий кризисной эпохи на философскую мысль, постановки проблем ответственности философа перед обществом и переосмысления самообраза, формы существования и методов самой философии, что приобретает в настоящее время новую актуальность. Ключевыми темами, на которых сосредоточено данное исследование, являются — проект философии как процесса самокритики, происходящего одновременно с внутренним перерождением философа, понимание субъекта, философия истории, концепция абсолютного опосредования, идея свободы, проблема зла, особенности диалектики и философской веры Танабэ Хадзимэ. Итогом переосмысления ос- нов, предпринятого самим Танабэ, стала прежде всего критика ряда фундаментальных принципов западной философии, таких как автономия субъекта, верховенство разума, исторический прогресс. Это переосмысление было им отлито в форму обращения к национальной духовной традиции, создания своеобразной религиозной философии путём комбинации и интерпретации отдельных доктрин буддийской мысли, в частности учения Синрана и буддийской школы Дзёдо. Пример проекта философии как пути покаяния Танабэ показывает, как модернизированный буддийский взгляд на мир, предложенный японским мыслителем, помогает найти способ философского разрешения кризисного мироощущения. Изучение новейших исследований политической роли Киотоской школы в военный период и анализ первоисточников позволяет более сбалансированно оценить реальное историческое значение философии Танабэ.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The book Philosophy as Metanoetics by the Japanese philosopher Tanabe Hajime written in the last year of WW2 marks an important turning point in his career which is interesting in terms of the influence of historical events on philosophical thought, the philosopher’s responsibility to society and rethinking of self-image, own existence and methods of philosophy, seemingly topical nowadays.</p><p>The key topic of this study on late Tanabe is the focus on philosophy as on a self-critical process, taking place in parallel with the inner rebirth of philosopher.</p><p>The result of the rethinking of the Western philosophy foundations of Tanabe in his inquiry on the subject, philosophy of history, absolute mediation, idea of freedom, problem of the Evil, dialectics was primarily critical. This rethinking manifested itself in Tanabe’s appeal to national spiritual tradition, a religious philosophy combining separate Buddhist doctrines, in particular the teachings of Shinran and the Jodo school.</p><p>The example of Tanabe’s project of philosophy as a path of repentance shows how the modernized Buddhist worldview helps to find a philosophical resolution of the crisis. The study of the latest research on the political role of the Kyoto School during the WW2 and the analysis of primary sources contributed to a more balanced assessment on the historical signifiance of Tanabe philosophy.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Танабэ Хадзимэ</kwd><kwd>философия истории</kwd><kwd>свобода</kwd><kwd>метанойя</kwd><kwd>метаноэтика</kwd><kwd>абсолютное ничто</kwd><kwd>опосредование</kwd><kwd>сила Другого</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Tanabe Hajime</kwd><kwd>philosophy of history</kwd><kwd>freedom</kwd><kwd>metanoya</kwd><kwd>metanoethics</kwd><kwd>Absolute Nothing</kwd><kwd>mediation</kwd><kwd>power of the Other</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dale P.N. 1986. The Myth of Japanese Uniqueness. London and Sydney: Croom Helm and Nissan Institute for Japanese Studies. 233 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dale P.N. 1986. The Myth of Japanese Uniqueness. London and Sydney: Croom Helm and Nissan Institute for Japanese Studies. 233 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Heisig J.W. 2001. Philosophers of Nothingness: An Essay on the Kyoto School. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. 380 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Heisig J.W. 2001. Philosophers of Nothingness: An Essay on the Kyoto School. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. 380 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kawamura Eiko. 1990. The Logic of Species and the Pursuit of True Reality // Heisig J.W., Unno T. (eds). The Religious Philosophy of Tanabe Hajime. Berkeley: California: Asian Humanities Press. P. 223-234.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kawamura Eiko. 1990. The Logic of Species and the Pursuit of True Reality // Heisig J.W., Unno T. (eds). The Religious Philosophy of Tanabe Hajime. Berkeley: California: Asian Humanities Press. P. 223-234.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Murthy V., Schäfer F., Ward M. (eds). 2017. Confronting Capital and Empire: Rethinking Kyoto School Philosophy (Brill’s Series on Modern East Asia in a Global Historical Perspective; volume 6). Leiden, Boston: Brill. 395 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Murthy V., Schäfer F., Ward M. (eds). 2017. Confronting Capital and Empire: Rethinking Kyoto School Philosophy (Brill’s Series on Modern East Asia in a Global Historical Perspective; volume 6). Leiden, Boston: Brill. 395 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ozaki Makoto. 2001. Individuum, Society, Humankind. The Triadic Logic of Species According to Hajime Tanabe. Leiden, Boston, Kӧln: Brill. 268 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ozaki Makoto. 2001. Individuum, Society, Humankind. The Triadic Logic of Species According to Hajime Tanabe. Leiden, Boston, Kӧln: Brill. 268 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sakai Naoki. 2017. Ethnicity and Species. On the Philosophy of Multiethnic State and Japanese Imperialism. Confronting capital and empire: rethinking Kyoto school philosophy. Eds. V. Murthy, F. Schäfer, M. Ward. Leiden, Boston: Brill. P. 141-175.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sakai Naoki. 2017. Ethnicity and Species. On the Philosophy of Multiethnic State and Japanese Imperialism. Confronting capital and empire: rethinking Kyoto school philosophy. Eds. V. Murthy, F. Schäfer, M. Ward. Leiden, Boston: Brill. P. 141-175.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tanabe Hajime. 2004. The Philosophy of Crisis or a Crisis in Philosophy. Reflections on Heidegger`s Rectoral Address. Defending Japan’s Pacific War: the Kyoto School Philosophers and Post-White Power. London, New York: Routledge Curzon. P. 181-187.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tanabe Hajime. 2004. The Philosophy of Crisis or a Crisis in Philosophy. Reflections on Heidegger`s Rectoral Address. Defending Japan’s Pacific War: the Kyoto School Philosophers and Post-White Power. London, New York: Routledge Curzon. P. 181-187.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Williams D. 2004. Defending Japan’s Pacific War: the Kyoto School Philosophers and Post-White Power. London, New York: Routledge Curzon. 238 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Williams D. 2004. Defending Japan’s Pacific War: the Kyoto School Philosophers and Post-White Power. London, New York: Routledge Curzon. 238 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nagata Hiroshi. 1948. Tetsugaku to minshushugi: Nishida — Tanabe tetsugaku hihan no tame ni [Philosophy and Democracy: Towards a Critique of Nishida and Tanabe`s Philosophy]. Tokyo: Komeiji shoten. 204 p. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nagata Hiroshi. 1948. Tetsugaku to minshushugi: Nishida — Tanabe tetsugaku hihan no tame ni [Philosophy and Democracy: Towards a Critique of Nishida and Tanabe`s Philosophy]. Tokyo: Komeiji shoten. 204 p. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ohashi Ryosuke. 2001. Kyoto gakuha to Nihon kaigun: shin shiryo „Oshima memo“ o megutte [The Kyoto School and the Japanese Navy: Over the new historical material „Oshima Notes“]. Tokyo: PHP Shinsha. 349 p. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ohashi Ryosuke. 2001. Kyoto gakuha to Nihon kaigun: shin shiryo „Oshima memo“ o megutte [The Kyoto School and the Japanese Navy: Over the new historical material „Oshima Notes“]. Tokyo: PHP Shinsha. 349 p. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tanabe Hajime. 2010a. Zangedo toshite no tetsugaku [Philosophy as Metanoetics]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. 514 p. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tanabe Hajime. 2010a. Zangedo toshite no tetsugaku [Philosophy as Metanoetics]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. 514 p. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tanabe Hajime. 2010b. Shyu no ronri [Logic of Species]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. 515 p. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tanabe Hajime. 2010b. Shyu no ronri [Logic of Species]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. 515 p. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yamada Munemutsu. 1975. Showa no seishinshi: Kyoto gakuha no tetsugaku [Showa Intellectual History: The philosophy of the Kyoto School]. Kyoto: Jinbun Shoin. 286 p. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yamada Munemutsu. 1975. Showa no seishinshi: Kyoto gakuha no tetsugaku [Showa Intellectual History: The philosophy of the Kyoto School]. Kyoto: Jinbun Shoin. 286 p. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
