<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimoconcept</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Концепт: философия, религия, культура</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Concept: philosophy, religion, culture</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-8831</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-0540</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МГИМО</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/2541-8831-2021-4-20-145-157</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimoconcept-578</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖКУЛЬТУРНАЯ КОММУНИКАЦИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLES. INTERCULTURAL COMMNUNICATION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Концепция «опыта» Мори Аримасы</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Mori Arimasa’s Concept of Experience</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8207-801X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Карелова</surname><given-names>Л. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Karelova</surname><given-names>L. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Любовь Борисовна Карелова — кандидат философских наук, старший научный сотрудник</p><p>109240, Москва, ул. Гончарная, д. 12, стр. 1</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Liubov B. Karelova — PhD in Philosophy, Senior Research Fellow</p><p>12/1, Goncharnaya str., Moscow, 109240</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">lbkarelova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт философии РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Philosophy of Russian Academy of Sciences</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>145</fpage><lpage>157</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Карелова Л.Б., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Карелова Л.Б.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Karelova L.B.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/578">https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/578</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья вводит в научный оборот и реконструирует основные идеи книги Мори Аримасы «Опыт и мысль», которая впервые увидела свет в виде журнальных публикаций, вышедших в 1970–1972 гг., и никогда не переводилась на европейские языки. В центре внимания — концепция опыта, в рамках которой японский философ, живший во Франции, предпринимает сравнительный анализ социокультурных и лингвистических оснований опыта японцев и европейцев. В статье рассматриваются основные аспекты концепции Мори: понимание опыта как реальности и как субъекта, разделение двух форм опыта — универсального и личного, соотношение опыта и языка, а также опыта и мысли, теория «бинарных связей» и «мира второго лица», призванная выявить и объяснить глубинные предпосылки, определяющие специфический характер опыта японцев. Автор статьи показывает, что несмотря на увлечение западной философией и жизнь вдали от родины, Мори собственным примером подтверждает свой тезис об обусловленности первичного опыта человека его исходной культурной «глубинной предрасположенностью» и лингвистической принадлежностью. Несмотря на инокультурное окружение, сам Мори Аримаса мыслит в целом примерно в той же парадигме, что и его коллегифилософы, проживавшие в Японии. Он разделяет присущий японской философии эмпиризм, восприятие отдельного субъективного опыта как фрагмента универсального опыта, понимание субъекта как совокупности отношений, притом субъекта, включённого в познаваемую посредством опыта реальность. В заключение даётся оценка идей Мори с точки зрения подходов этноэпистемологии.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article introduces and reconstructs the main ideas of the book Experience and Thought by Mori Arimasa. Released in the form of journal publications in 1970–1972, it has never been translated into European languages. The Japanese philosopher who spent a large part of his life in France undertakes a comparative analysis of the socio-cultural and linguistic foundations of the experience of the Japanese and Europeans. The article examines the main aspects of Mori’s concept of experience: understanding experience as a reality and as a subject, separation of two forms of experience — universal and personal, the relationship between experience and language and between experience and thought, the theory of binary connections and second person world, designed to identify and explain the underlying prerequisites that determine the specific character of the experience of the Japanese. The author of the article shows that Mori confirms his own thesis that the primary experience of a person is conditioned by original cultural deep predisposition and linguistic affiliation. Notwithstanding his life abroad and passion for Western philosophy, Mori thinks in about the same way as his fellow philosophers who lived in Japan, sharing their empiricism, understanding the subject as a relatum, perceiving an individual subjective experience as a segment of the universal experience, interpreting a subject as a sum total of relations. In conclusion, Mori’s ideas are assessed in terms of ethno-epistemological approaches. Undoubtedly, Mori’s analysis of the experience provides arguments for epistemological pluralism. It allows us to talk about the variability of the perception of reality in different cultural and historical contexts and about the possibility of different ways and perspectives of its comprehension, the spatial and temporal dynamics of epistemological terminology, despite the apparent commonality. Mori Arimasa taking experience as the starting point and the main task of his analysis, by his own example, demonstrated the importance of the empirical form of acquiring knowledge for Japanese epistemic culture, along with its inherent specificity of understanding experience. His linguistic studies of the structures of the native language resulted in the creation of a memorable image of the second person world and outlined the field of joint collective experience without a clearly expressed single autonomous subject of cognitive activity. Mori demonstrated an approach to cognition, in which the knower feels oneself a part of the cognized reality, and is not alienated from it, as a result the cognition turns into self-cognition of reality.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Мори Аримаса</kwd><kwd>опыт</kwd><kwd>мысль</kwd><kwd>реальность</kwd><kwd>язык</kwd><kwd>«глубинная предрасположенность культуры»</kwd><kwd>«мир второго лица»</kwd><kwd>«бинарные связи»</kwd><kwd>этноэпистемология</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Mori Arimasa</kwd><kwd>experience</kwd><kwd>thought</kwd><kwd>reality</kwd><kwd>language</kwd><kwd>predisposition of culture</kwd><kwd>world of the second person</kwd><kwd>binary connections</kwd><kwd>ethno-epistemology</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ben-Dasan I. The Japanese and the Jews. — New York: Weatherhill, 1972. — XI, 193 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ben-Dasan, I. (1972) The Japanese and the Jews. New York: Weatherhill.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Epistemology for the Rest of the World / ed. Stich S., Mizumoto M., McCready E. — New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. — xviii, 295 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190865085.001.0001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hagihara, S. (1997) ‘Mori Arimasa no “keiken” [The concept “experience” in the works of Arimasa Mori]’, in Ōsaka furitsu daigaku kiyō (jinbun shakai kagaku) [Osaka University Departmental Bulletin Paper (Human and Social Sciences)]. Vol. 45, pp. 7–15. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ethno-Epistemology: New Directions for Global Epistemology / ed. Mizumoto M., Ganeri J., Goddard C. — New York: Routledge, 2020. — 288 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037774</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mizumoto, M., Ganeri, J. and Goddard, C. (eds) (2020) Ethno-Epistemology: New Directions for Global Epistemology. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037774</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mizuta M. Arimasa Mari’s Concept of the Experience of ‘Keiken’: The Ultimate Reality and Meaning of a Japanese Christian // Ultimate Reality and Meaning. — 1998. — Vol. 21, № 2. — Pp. 106–115. https://doi.org/10.3138/uram.21.2.106</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mizuta, M. (1998) ‘Arimasa Mori’s Concept of the Experience of “Keiken”: The Ultimate Reality and Meaning of a Japanese Christian’, Ultimate Reality and Meaning, 21(2), pp. 106–115. https://doi.org/10.3138/uram.21.2.106</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morita M. Mori and Kierkegaard: Experience and Existence // Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. — Pp. 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230589827_12</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mori, A. (1993) Keiken to shiso [Experience and Thought]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nishitani K. Understanding Japaneseness: a fresh look at Nipponjinron through Maternal-filial affection / ed. Sherrill M. — Lanham: Hamilton Books, 2016. — xvii, 250 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morita, M. (2008) ‘Mori and Kierkegaard: Experience and Existence’, in Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230589827_12.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">和辻哲郎. 風土 [Вацудзи Тэцуро. Климат]. // 和辻哲郎全集 [Полное собрание сочинений Вацудзи Тэцуро. Т. 8.]. — Токио: Иванами сётэн. 1962a. — C. 1-256.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nakane, Ch. (1967) Tate shakai no ningen kankei: tan’itsu shakai riron [Human relations in a vertical society: A theory of a unilateral society]. Tokyo: Kōdansha. 189 p. (in Japanese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">和辻哲郎.倫理学 [Вацудзи Тэцуро. Этика]. Часть 1 // 和辻哲郎全集 [Полное собрание сочинений Вацудзи Тэцуро. Т. 10.]. — Токио: Иванами сётэн. 1962b. — 1-660 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nishida, K. (1965) ‘Zen no kenkyu [A Study of Good]’, in Nishida Kitaro zensyu [Complete Works of Nishida Kitaro. Vol. 1]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, pp. 1–200. (in Japanese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">森有正. 経験と思想 [Мори Аримаса. Опыт и мысль]. — Токио: Иванами сётэн, 1993. — 207 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nishitani, K. (2016) Understanding Japaneseness: a fresh look at Nipponjinron through Maternal-filial affection. Edited by M. Sherrill. Lanham: Hamilton Books.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">中根千枝. タテ社会の人間関係: 単一社会の理論 [Наканэ Тиэ. Отношения между людьми в вертикальном обществе: теория единого общества]. Токио: Коданся, — 1967. 189 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stich, S., Mizumoto, M. and McCready, E. (eds) (2018) Epistemology for the Rest of the World. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190865085.001.0001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">西田幾多郎. 善の研究 [Нисида Китаро. Исследование блага] // 西田幾多集 [Полн. Собр.соч. Нисиды Китаро Т. 1.]. — Токио: Иванами сётэн, 1965. — С. 1–200.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Watsuji, T. (1962a) ‘Fudo [Climat]’, in Watsuji Tetsuro zensyu [Complete Works of Watsuji Tetsuro. Vol. 8.]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, pp. 1–256 (In Japanese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">萩原俊治. 森有正の「経験」[Хагихара Сюндзи. Понятие «опыт» у Мори Аримасы], 大阪府立大学紀要 （人文・社会科学）[Вестник Осакского университета (Гуманитарные и общественные науки)]. — 1997. No. 45, c.7–15.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Watsuji, T. (1962b) ‘Rinrigaku [Ethics]’. Part 1, in Watsuji Tetsuro zensyu [Complete Works of Watsuji Tetsuro Vol. 10.]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, pp. 1–660. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
