<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimoconcept</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Концепт: философия, религия, культура</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Concept: philosophy, religion, culture</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-8831</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-0540</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МГИМО</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/2541-8831-2022-1-21-20-29</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimoconcept-597</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ФИЛОСОФИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLES. PHILOSOPHY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>«Культурные исследования» как политическая практика</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Cultural Studies as a Political Practice</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Щипков</surname><given-names>Н. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shсhipkov</surname><given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Николай Александрович Щипков — магистр культурологии, ст. преподаватель</p><p>101000, Москва, ул. Мясницкая, д. 21</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Nicolay A. Shchipkov — MA in Cultural Studies, Senior lecturer</p><p>21, Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, 101000</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">nik75e@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Российская академия живописи, ваяния и зодчества Ильи Глазунова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Ilya Glazunov Russian Academy of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>20</fpage><lpage>29</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Щипков Н.А., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Щипков Н.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Shсhipkov N.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/597">https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/597</self-uri><abstract><p>В современной философской, культурологической и политологической мысли все более заметным становится феномен политизации гуманитарной научной мысли. «Партийность» ученых и философов — не новое явление в истории науки. Однако сегодня подобное разделение на отдельные группы и «лагеря» приобретает не только мировоззренческий, но и ярко выраженный политический характер. Пример западноевропейской, англоговорящей гуманитарной академической среды является в этом отношении особенно показательным. Сегодня можно говорить о вступающем в активную стадию конфликте между всё более радикализующимися условно «левыми» и «правыми» дискурсами внутри англоязычного академического сообщества. Для понимания природы этого противостояния необходимо рассмотреть эти дискурсы как отдельные явления, а также понять их исторические корни. Наиболее ярко политический дискурс новых левых раскрывается в программе так называемых «культурных исследований», появившихся в среде послевоенных английских марксистских интеллектуалов, и переместившийся позднее в США. В рамках этой программы сложился и полностью созрел особенный взгляд на культуру, совмещающий в себе марксистский и социологический взгляд на проблему культуры, но не сводящийся к каждому из них в отдельности. Культура в подобной парадигме понимается как следствие социальных действий людей, но одновременно и как определенная система, закрепляющая способы реализации этих отношений. Этот подход отличается как от классического марксизма, выделяющего в первую очередь экономические отношения между людьми, так и от структурного функционализма, в котором понятия общество и культура являются практически синонимами. Можно утверждать, что дискурс «новых левых» и программа «культурных исследований» — это разные проявления единого методологического подхода или мировоззрения. В западной академической среде подобное мировоззрение сегодня является доминирующим. В настоящей статье рассматриваются история и основные методологические установки «культурных исследований» этого типа, а также современная критика этого подхода.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The phenomenon of politicization of humanitarian scientific thought is becoming increasingly noticeable in the modern philosophical, cultural and political science. Scientists and philosophers belonging to political parties are nothing new in the history of science. Today, however, this kind of division into separate groups reveals not only ideological, but also a pronounced political character. The example of the Western European, English-speaking humanitarian academic community appears to be particularly indicative in this regard. Apparently, the conflict between the increasingly radicalized left and right discourses within the English-speaking academic community is entering an active phase. To understand the nature of this confrontation, it is necessary both to consider these discourses as separate phenomena, and to delve into their historical roots. The political discourse of the New Left is most clearly revealed in the program of the so-called cultural studies that appeared among post-war English Marxist intellectuals and later took root in the USA. The term was popularized by Herbert Richard Hoggart a British academic who specialized in sociology, English literature, and British popular culture. In 1964 he founded the Center for Contemporary Cultural Studies in Birmingham (CCCS). The history of CCCS is strongly associated with the name of Stuart Henry Hall, who was Hoggart's assistant and headed the Center since 1971. The connection between political action and cultural studies permeates the entire history of this field of knowledge. The very formation of the discipline and its institutionalization in the UK were influenced by such political and cultural events as the post-war Americanization of English popular culture, the spread of telecommunications, the new era of multiculturalism in Britain, and new critical theories. At the same time, many post-war European countries, such as Germany and France, showed interest in research, which ultimately shaped the apparatus of cultural studies. Within the framework of this program, we can see an increasingly nature perspective on culture that combines the Marxist view on the problem of culture and the sociological one but is not reduced to either of them. In this kind of paradigm, culture is understood as a consequence of people's social actions, and at the same time, as a certain system that fixes the ways of implementing these relations. This approach differs from both classical Marxism facosed on economic relations between people and from structural functionalism, in which the concepts of society and culture are almost synonymous. The author states that the discourse of the New Left and the program of cultural studies are different manifestations of a single methodological approach or worldview. At present, this is the dominant worldview in the Western academic community. The article examines the history and main methodological guidelines of this type of cultural studies, as well as today's criticism of this approach.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>культурология</kwd><kwd>культурные исследования</kwd><kwd>новые левые</kwd><kwd>неомарксизм</kwd><kwd>Бурдьё</kwd><kwd>франкфуртская школа</kwd><kwd>неофункционализм</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>cultural studies</kwd><kwd>cultural studies history</kwd><kwd>neo-Marxism</kwd><kwd>Richard Hoggart</kwd><kwd>Bourdieu</kwd><kwd>Stuart Hall</kwd><kwd>E. P. Thompson</kwd><kwd>Frankfurt school</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бурдьё П. Социология социального пространства. — Москва: Институт экспериментальной социологии; Санкт-Петербург: Алетейя, 2007. — 288 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Back, L. (2012) ‘Live Sociology: Social Research and its Futures’, The Sociological Review, 60(1_suppl), pp. 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02115.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Куренной В.А. Исследовательская и политическая программа культурных исследований // Логос. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 14-79.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ballantine, J. H. and Roberts, K. A. (2012) Our social world: introduction to sociology. Thousands Oaks, Calif.: Pine Forge Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Милбанк Дж. Надзор за возвышенным: критика социологии религии // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. — 2013. — Т. 31, № 3. — С. 210-284.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barker, C. (2008) Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publications.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Поляков Л. В. Социология и культура: порядок слов // Телескоп: журнал социологических и маркетинговых исследований. — 2013. — №4 — С. 46-48.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beck, U. and Sznaider, N. (2006) ‘Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda’, The British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Back L. Live Sociology: Social Research and its Futures // The Sociological Review. — 2012. — Vol. 60, № 1_suppl. — Pp. 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02115.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bhambra, G. (2007) Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. New York: Palgrave.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ballantine J., Roberts K. Our social world: Introduction to Sociology. — Thousands Oaks: Pine Forge Press; 2012. — xxxiv, 593 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bourdieu, P. (2007) Sociologija social'nogo prostranstva [Sociologie de l'espace social]. Moscow: Institut jeksperimental'noj sociologii Publ.; Saint Petersburg: Aletejja Publ. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barker C. Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. — London: Sage, 2008. — xxiv, 525 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hall, S. (2000) Cultural studies: ein politisches Theorieprojekt. Hamburg: Argument.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Beck U., Sznaider N. Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda // The British Journal of Sociology. — 2006. — Vol. 57, № 1. — Pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hoggart, R. (2009) The Uses of Literacy: Aspects of Working-Class Life. London, Penguin Modern Classics.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bhambra, G. Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. — New York: Palgrave, 2007. — viii, 200 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurennoy, V.A. (2012) ‘Cultural Studies: Research and Political Program’, Logos, (1), Pp. 14-79. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hall S. Culture Studies: Ein politisches Theorieprojekt. — Hamburg: Argument, 2000. — 158 s.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Milbank, J. (1990) ‘Policing the Sublime: A Critique of the Sociology of Religion’, in Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason. Oxford; Cambridge: Blackwell pp. 101-144, (Russ.ed.: (2013) ‘Nadzor za vozvyshennym: kritika sociologii religii’, State, religion and church in Russia and worldwide, 31(3), pp. 210-284.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hoggart R. The Uses of Literacy: Aspects of Working-Class Life. — London, Penguin Modern Classics, 2009. — 400 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Du Gay, P. et al. (1997) Doing cultural studies: the story of the Sony walkman. London: Sage.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman / P. Du Gay, S. Hall, L. Janes, [et al.]. — London: Sage, 1997. — 151 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Patterson, O. (2014) ‘Making Sense of Culture’, Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), pp. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043123</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Patterson O. Making sense of culture // Annual Review of Sociology. — 2014. — Vol. 40, № 1. Pp. 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043123</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polyakov, L. V. (2013) ‘Sociologija i kul'tura: porjadok slov [Sociology and culture: word order]’, Teleskop: journal of sociological and marketing research, (4), P. 46-48. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Williams R. The Long Revolution. — New York: Columbia University Press, 1961. — 370 p. https://doi.org/10.7312/will93760.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Williams, R. (1961) The Long Revolution. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/will93760</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sahlins M.D. Waiting for Foucault, still. — Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2002. — 84 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sahlins, M. D. (2002) Waiting for Foucault, still. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Steinmetz G. The Imperial Entanglements of Sociology in the United States, Britain, and France Since the Nineteenth Century // Ab Imperio. — 2009. — Vol. 2009, № 4. — P. 23–79. https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2009.0079</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Steinmetz, G. (2009) ‘The Imperial Entanglements of Sociology in the United States, Britain, and France Since the Nineteenth Century’, Ab Imperio, 2009(4), pp. 23–79. https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2009.0079</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thompson E.P. The Making of the English Working Class. — London: Victor Gollancz 1963. — 848 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thompson E. P. (1963) The Making of the English Working Class. London: Victor Gollancz.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
