<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimoconcept</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Концепт: философия, религия, культура</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Concept: philosophy, religion, culture</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-8831</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-0540</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МГИМО</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/2541-8831-2023-2-26-63-72</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimoconcept-765</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>РЕЛИГИОВЕДЕНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLES. RELIGIOUS STUDIES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Концепт безопасности в истории и культуре Турции</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Concept of Security in Turkish History and Culture</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5751-0306</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Давыдов</surname><given-names>С. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Davydov</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Сергей Александрович Давыдов — магистрант факультета Международных отношений</p><p>119454, Москва, проспект Вернадского, 76 (Россия)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Sergei A. Davydov — MA student of School of International Relations</p><p>76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, Russia, 119454 (Russia)</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">davydov.s.a@my.mgimo.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГИМО МИД России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>MGIMO University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>63</fpage><lpage>72</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Давыдов С.А., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Давыдов С.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Davydov S.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/765">https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/765</self-uri><abstract><p>Анализ эволюции подходов к вопросам безопасности в истории философии и культуры Турции помогает пролить свет на ход развития основных теорий и идей, которые служили катализатором данного процесса, что особенно актуально в контексте относительной «закрытости» турецкого политического истеблишмента и основополагающих внешнеполитических документов. Кроме того, данное исследование направлено на анализ ряда проблем, связанных с изменениями внешнеполитического курса Турецкой Республики, и может дать более актуальное понимание логики действий Анкары. Предметом данной работы является философско-теоретическое обоснование подходов турецкого государства к осуществлению политического курса в отношении вопросов безопасности. Основным методологическим инструментом в данной связи видится применение историко-хронологического и историко-генетического метода — их использование позволит рассмотреть и выделить причинные факторы эволюции подходов Турции к обеспечению собственной безопасности. Новизна исследования заключается в том, что вопросы эволюции концепта безопасности в турецком политическом дискурсе мало затрагиваются в отечественной туркологии и в основном не выходят за пределы внешнеполитического курса правящей в XXI в. Партии справедливости и развития; данное исследование же ставит своей целью комплексное изучение вопросов безопасности в перспективе турецкой истории от ранних дней Османского бейлика до современной Турецкой Республики. Это позволяет сделать вывод о постепенном изменении концепта безопасности в зависимости от внешнеполитической повестки дня Турции и целей правящих кругов турецкого государства.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>An analysis of the evolution of academic approaches to security issues in Turkish politics will help shed light on the development of Turkish political thought and the main theories and ideas that served as a catalyst for this process. This study is especially relevant in the modern context when the Turkish political establishment is regarded as more private and the underlying foreign policy documents are primarily classified. In addition, this study is able to give a new evaluation of a number of problems related to changes in the foreign policy of the Republic of Türkiye and provide a more relevant understanding of the logic behind Ankara's actions. The subject of this paper is the philosophical and theoretical justification of the Turkish state's political approach to security issues. The main methodological tools in this regard seem historical-chronological and historicalgenetic methods — their use will allow to consider and highlight the causal factors in the evolution of Turkey's approaches to ensuring its own security. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that the issues of the evolution of the security concept in the Turkish political discourse have been little addressed in Russian Turkology and mainly do not go beyond the foreign policy of the ruling Justice and Development Party. The present paper aims at a comprehensive study of security issues in the perspective of Turkish history from the early days of the Beylik of Osman to the modern Republic of Türkiye. The conducted research shows that Turkish political thought has gradually changed according to Türkiye's foreign policy agenda and the goals that the ruling circles of the Turkish state set for themselves throughout its history.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Турецкая Республика</kwd><kwd>безопасность</kwd><kwd>османизм</kwd><kwd>кемализм</kwd><kwd>пантюркизм</kwd><kwd>неоосманизм</kwd><kwd>восточный аристотелизм</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>the Republic of Türkiye</kwd><kwd>security</kwd><kwd>Ottomanism</kwd><kwd>Kemalism</kwd><kwd>Pan-Turkism</kwd><kwd>Neo-Ottomanism</kwd><kwd>Eastern Aristotelianism</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аватков В.А., Сбитнева А.И. Новый национализм Турецкой Республики // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология. — 2022. — Т. 24, No 2. —С. 291-302. https://doi. org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-2-291-302</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Avatkov, V. A. and Sbitneva, A. I. (2022) ‘New Nationalism of Turkish Republic’, RUDN Journal of Political Science, 24(2), pp. 291–302. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-2-291-302</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Геллнер Э. Нации и национализм. — Москва: Прогресс, 1991. — 320 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cheshko, S. (2001) ‘Self-Determination Doctrine Crisis’, Ètnografičeskoe obozrenie, (2), pp. 3–17. (In Russian). Dawn, C. E. (1961) ‘From Ottomanism to Arabism: the Origin of an Ideology’, The Review of Politics, 23(3), pp. 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500008792</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ермекбаев А.А. Изменение внешней политики Турции: от кемализма до неосманизма (основные внутренние и внешние факторы) // Вестник Карагандинского университета. Серия: История. Философия. — 2018. — Т. 90, No 2. — С. 103-109.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hobsbawm, E. J. (1992) Nations and Nationalism since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521439612 (Russ. ed.: (1998) Natsii i natsionalizm posle 1780 goda. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiia Publ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Киреев Н.Г. История Турции. ХХ век. — Москва: ИВ РАН, 2007. — 605 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karpat, K. H. (2002) Studies on Ottoman Social and Political History. Leiden: BRILL. https://doi. org/10.1163/9789047400899</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Левченко А. Турция: созвездие лиры // Прямые инвестиции. — 2012. — No 12. — С. 76-79.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kireev, N. G. (2007) Istoriya Turtsii. XX vek [History of Türkiye. 20th century]. Moscow: IV RAN Publ. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Литвинов Э.П. Философские основы концепции безопасности // Пространство и время. — 2012. — No 1. — С. 66–73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lapatin, V. V. et al. (2022) ‘Philosophical concept of “Dilemma of security” in the historical context of political events’, Medicine. Sociology. Philosophy. Applied research, (3), pp. 163–165. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Надеин-Раевский В.А. Идейная борьба и «новая Турция» // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. — 2016. — No 2. — С. 22–31. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-2-47-22-31</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levchenko, A. (2012) ‘Turtsiia: sozvezdie liry [Türkiye: the Constellation of Lira]’, Prâmye investicii, (12), pp. 76–79. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Смит Э. Национализм и историки // Нации и национализм. — Москва: Праксис, 2002. — 236-263 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Litvinov, E. P. (2012) ‘Philosophical Foundations of the Security Concept’, Space and time, (1), pp. 66–73. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Философский концепт "Дилеммы безопасности" в историческом контексте политических событий / В.В. Лапатин, С.Н. Шингаркина, Т.Р. Бикметов [и др.] // Медицина. Социология. Философия. Прикладные исследования. – 2022. – No 3. – С. 163-165.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nadein-Raevskiy, V. A. (2016) ‘The Struggle of Ideas and «The New Turkey»’, MGIMO Review of International Relations, (2), pp. 22–31. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-2-47-22-31</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хобсбаум Э. Нации и национализм после 1780 года. — Санкт-Петербург: Алетейя, 1998. — 305 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Özpek, B. B. and Tanriverdi Yaşar, N. (2018) ‘Populism and foreign policy in Turkey under the AKP rule’, Turkish Studies, 19(2), pp. 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2017.1400912</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чешко С.В. Кризис доктрины самоопределения // Этнографическое обозрение. — 2001. — No 2. — С. 3–17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smith, A. D. (1996) ‘Nationalism and the Historians’, in Mapping the Nation. London ; New York: Verso, pp. 175–197. (Russ. ed.: (2002) ‘Natsionalizm i istoriki’, in Natsii i natsionalizm. Moscow: Praksis Publ., pp. 236–263.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Янченкова О.А. Национализм в дискурсе современной философии: анализ теоретических концепций // Гуманитарий Юга России. — 2019. — Т. 8, No 4. — С. 158–166. https://doi.org/10.23683/22278656.2019.4.17</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yanchenkova, O. A. (2019) ‘Nationalism in the Discourse of Modern Philosophy: Analysis of Theoretical Concepts’, Humanities of the South of Russia, 8(4), pp. 158–166. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.23683/22278656.2019.4.17</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dawn E.C. From Ottomanism to Arabism: The Origin of an Ideology // The Review of Politics. — 1961. — Vol. 23, No 3. — pp. 378–400. https://doi:10.1017/S0034670500008792</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yermekbayev, A. A. (2018) ‘The Change in Turkey`s Foreign Policy: from Kemalism to Neo-Ottomanism (The Main Internal and External Factors)’, Bulletin of the Karaganda University. History, philosophy series, 90(2), pp. 103–109. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Karpat K.H. Studies on Ottoman Social and Political History. — Leiden: Brill, 2002. — 856 p. https://doi. org/10.1163/9789047400899</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karpat K.H. Studies on Ottoman Social and Political History. — Leiden: Brill, 2002. — 856 p. https://doi. org/10.1163/9789047400899</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Özpek B. B., Tanriverdi Y. N. Populism and foreign policy in Turkey under the AKP rule // Turkish Studies. — 2018. — Vol. 19, No. 2. — Pp. 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2017.1400912</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Özpek B. B., Tanriverdi Y. N. Populism and foreign policy in Turkey under the AKP rule // Turkish Studies. — 2018. — Vol. 19, No. 2. — Pp. 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2017.1400912</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Saklı A. R. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti ulus devleti ve milliyetçilik anlayışının uygunluğu sorunu // Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. — 2011. — Vol 13, No 1. — pp. 1–22.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saklı A. R. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti ulus devleti ve milliyetçilik anlayışının uygunluğu sorunu // Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. — 2011. — Vol 13, No 1. — pp. 1–22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
