Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

The Apophatics of Alexey Vitakov’s Artistic Thinking: Meeting with the Other

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2025-2-34-135-143

Abstract

The relevance of this study is due to the growing interest in the ontological issues of art and literature, which today allows us to resist the global processes of digitalization of society. The poetry of the famous bard Alexey Vitakov, namely his poem from the winter cycle "Lose me in a birch grove ...", served as material for studying this issue. The purpose of the study is to show the phenomenon of apophatic culture, manifested in Russian artistic verbal culture, in poetry, at the ontological (thanatological) level of the text. To achieve this goal, theoretical works devoted to the apophatic paradigm in world culture were analyzed, opening up opportunities for onto-hermeneutic analysis of the artistic text. In modern cultural studies, the phenomenon of apophatic artistic culture is considered through the manifestation of the thanatological code. Within the framework of the onto-hermeneutic, cultural approach to the text, figurative implementations of this phenomenon in modern poetry, namely in the work of A. Vitakov, associated with the thanatological code, were studied. Additionally, the analysis extends to the typological level of the texts of Russian classics, the poem by A. S. Pushkin “Winter Road” and the poem by A. A. Blok "Russia", in which apophatics is expressed as a cultural phenomenon. A cultural examination of the concept of apophatics in its artistic cross-section requires research attention to the figure of the Other, a figure endowed with apophatic qualities and inscribed in the "text of fate", whom the lyrical hero of the poem meets in the conditions of a winter plain. . The ontological significance of the figure of the Other for me (the lyrical Me) is determined: to what extent is the Other important for me, how ready am I to approach him. A. Vitakov presents an artistic formula for meeting the Other in a threshold situation, in which his lyrical hero is on the verge of life and death. The results of the study consist in identifying the cultural and philosophical potential of modern poetry for further study of the problem of apophatics as a phenomenon of Russian artistic culture, a manifestation of national existence in Russian literature. The analysis of poetry makes it possible not only to outline new approaches to works of art in literary criticism, but also to treat differently the issue of studying apophaticism as a phenomenon of Russian literary culture. The results of the work may be of interest to philologists who include literature in the space of the great Bakhtinian dialogue of cultures, and can also be used in teaching courses on cultural studies and philosophy.

About the Authors

M. A. Dudareva
The Kosygin State University; Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod
Russian Federation

Marianna A. Dudareva — Doctor of Cultural Studies, Doctor of Philology, Head of the Department of General and Slavic Philology, Institute of Slavic Culture; Professor of the Department of Journalism

33, Sadovnicheskaya street, Moscow, 117997;

23, Gagarin avenue, Nizhni Novgorod, 603600;



E. L. Cherkashina
Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Elena L. Cherkashina — PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Russian as a 
Foreign Language and General Theoretical Disciplines

49, Timiryazev street, Moscow, 127550



References

1. Engström, M. (2010) ‘Apophaticism and Jurodstvo in Contemporary Russian Literaturen Literature]’, Slovo: Journal of Slavic Languages and Literatures, 51, pp. 129–140. (In Russian).

2. Tatarinova, O. V. (2011) ‘Principles of apophatic poetics in works of A. I. Vvedensky’, Theory and Practice of Social Development, (7), pp. 357–359. (In Russian).

3. Demidova E. (2016) ‘Cognition of the other in M. M. Bakhtin’s philosophy of the act’, Ethical thought, 16(1), pp. 66–76. (In Russian).

4. Dudareva, M. A. and Cherkashina, E. L. (2024) ‘Apophatica of Russian Life in the Poetry of Andrey Popov’, Kazanskaâ nauka, (5), pp. 197–199. (In Russian).

5. Dudareva, M. A. and Koltsova, N. Z. (2021) ‘Apophatic of a Fatherland in Valery Dudarev’s Poem “Petushki — Kokhma, Further Nowhere”’, Izvestiya of the Samara Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, Humanitarian, Medicobiological Sciences, 23(76), pp. 92–97. (In Russian). https://doi. org/10.37313/2413-9645-2021-23-76-92-97

6. Dudareva, M. A. and Nikitina, V. V. (2023) ‘Lexico-semantic Field “Homeland” in Valery Dudarev’s Poetry: National Axiology’, Kazanskaâ nauka, (8), pp. 29–31. (In Russian).

7. Elepova, M. Yu. (2012) ‘V. A. Zhukovsky’s sthetics in the apophatic context’, Discussion, (4), pp. 176–178. (In Russian).

8. Eliade, M. (1965) Le Sacré et le Profane. Paris: Gallimard. (Rus. ed.: (1994) Svjashhennoe i mirskoe. Moscow: MSU Publ.).

9. Filin, D. A. (2017) ‘Plato’s Apathetic Theology’, Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kulʹtury i iskusstv, (41–2), pp. 42–48. (In Russian).

10. Galieva, M. A. (2014) ‘Vlast’ zemli. Fol’klornaja tradicija v tvorchestve S.A. Esenina i V. G. Rasputina [The Power of the Land. Folklore Tradition in the Works of S. A. Yesenin and V. G. Rasputin]’, Traditional culture, (3), pp. 28–37. (In Russian).

11. Grachev, V. I. (2019) ‘Cultures the Phenomenon of Apophatic “the Dialectics of Myth” by A. F. Losev in the Context Topochron-axiogenic Paradigm of Culture’, Culture of culture, (3), p. 10. (In Russian).

12. Gurevich, P. and Spirova, E. (2019) ‘Science in the Apophatic Horizon’, Philosophical anthropology, 5(1), pp. 6–25. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2019-5-1-6-25

13. Losev, A. F. (1999) Samoe samo: Sochinenija [The very thing: Works]. Moscow: Exmo Publ. (In Russian).

14. Okeansky, V. P. (2010) Chelovek i total’nost’: pojetika prostranstva i ee krizis [Man and totality: poetics of space and its crisis]. Ivanovo: ShGPU Publ. (In Russian).

15. Tulchinskiy, G. (2020) ‘A. Platonov’s lessons in understanding the social life rationalization’, Heritage, (1), pp. 32–44. (In Russian): https://doi.org/10.31119/hrtg.2020.1.2

16. Turner, V. (1969) The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134666 (Rus. ed.: (1983) Simvol i ritual. Moscow: Nauka Publ.).


Review

For citations:


Dudareva M.A., Cherkashina E.L. The Apophatics of Alexey Vitakov’s Artistic Thinking: Meeting with the Other. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2025;9(2):135-143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2025-2-34-135-143

Views: 88


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)