Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

Modern Imagology: Significance and Development Prospects

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-2-22-86-101

Abstract

With the revival of nationalism and identity politics, imagological studies that analyze attitudes, stereotypes and prejudices about one’s own and others’ national character are becoming increasingly relevant. These studies investigate relationships that govern rhetoric, discursive representation, literary activity, and ultimately international relations in general. Imagology is currently intensively developing in literary criticism and other humanities, which also determines the relevance of this study. The purpose of this review article is to analyze scientific publications on the theoretical and practical aspects of imagology over the past 10 years in order to determine its significance and development prospects in the era of globalization. Тhe object of the study is the significance and prospects for the development of imagology; the subject of the study are scientific publications on imagological topics over the past 10 years. The choice of sources for this review was made by the keyword imagology on the following resources: Scopus, Cyberleninka, as well as Imagologica.eu — a site dedicated to imagological research over the past 10 years. An analysis of the main specialized series and collections of articles on imagology was carried out in order to identify the predominant topics of publications and confirm the role of imagology in literary criticism and other humanities. The study of modern Russian and foreign publications on imagological topics has shown that the modern environment is open to studying the discursively constructed nature of many social and cultural values. Thus, a large number of publications on imagological topics testify to the importance of modern imagology, its great prospects and continuous development. The analysis showed the main directions of research in modern imagology and proved that at present imagology is not concerned with isolated images, but with their relationships and associative links with other images, chronological boundaries of the dispersion of images, and shifts in content elements. Combining various approaches of contextual analysis (socio-historical, ethno-psychological and cultural-political), makes the imagological method effective and universal. It must be emphasized that imagology takes on the political mission of deconstructing nationalist reasoning and thus contributes to a better understanding between peoples. In cross-cultural, transnational and globalization studies, imagology has the potential to break stereotypes that oppose nations to each other and to find ways to interact.

About the Author

M. D. Bakhareva
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Marina D. Bakhareva — PhD student at the Department of Philosophy

76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, Russia, 119454



References

1. Barkhoff, J. and Leerssen, J. (2021) National Stereotyping, Identity Politics, European Crises. Leiden; Boston: BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004436107

2. Beller, M. and Leerssen, J. (2007) Imagology: The cultural construction and literary representation of national characters. A critical survey. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004358133

3. Berger, S. (2021) ‘Confronting the Other/Perceiving the Self’, in National Stereotyping, Identity Politics, European Crises. Leiden; Boston: BRILL, pp. 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004436107_003

4. Blažević, Z. (2014) ‘Global Challenge: The (Im)possibilities of Transcultural Imagology’, Umjetnost riječi, 58(3–4), pp. 355–367.

5. Blažević, Z. (2018) ‘Wider Image: Imagology and the Post-poststructuralist Challenge’, in Imagology Profiles: The Dynamics of National Imagery in Literature. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 28–39.

6. van Doorslaer, L. (2021) ‘Stereotyping by Default in Media Transfer’, in National Stereotyping, Identity Politics, European Crises. Leiden; Boston: BRILL, pp. 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004436107_012

7. Dyserinck, H. (2015) Ausgewählte Schriften zur vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft. Edited by E. Mehnert. Berlin: Frank & Timme.

8. Emer, F. K. (2012) ‘Die Imagologie als Arbeitsbereich der Komparatistik’, International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, (8), pp. 1–17.

9. Ewertowski, T. (2021) Images of China in Polish and Serbian Travel Writings (1720-1949). Leiden; Boston: BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435445

10. Giugliano, M. and Alsina Keith, V. (2019) ‘Seeing the image of one’s culture through the image of another: translating images of national identity’, Meta, 64(3), pp. 748–775. https://doi. org/10.7202/1070538ar

11. Hu, Y. and Mei, L. (2021) ‘From Literary Illusions to Media Simulacra: Toward a Semiotic Imagology in the Era of Global Communication’, European Review, 29(4), pp. 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1062798720000794

12. Ivanova, A. D. (2016) ‘About the Terms of Modern Imagology’, Vestnik Vâtskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, (11), pp. 74–78. (In Russian).

13. Kamalova, S. D. (2018) ‘Specificity of the Conceptual Apparatus of Imagology’, Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, (10–1), pp. 26–29. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-10-1.5

14. Köhler, U. K. (2019) Poetik der Nation: Englishness in der englischen Romantik. Leiden ; Boston: BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004407787

15. Kõvamees, A. (2018) ‘Some Remarks on the Estonian War Novel: The Case of Enn Kippel’, in Imagology Profiles: The Dynamics of National Imagery in Literature. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 123–134.

16. Laurušaitė, L. (2018) ‘Imagology as Image Geology’, in Imagology Profiles: The Dynamics of National Imagery in Literature. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 8–27.

17. Laurušaitė, L. (ed.) (2018) Imagology profiles: the dynamics of national imagery in literature. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

18. Leerssen, J. (2016) ‘Imagology: On using ethnicity to make sense of the world’, Iberic@l, Revue d’études ibériques et ibéro-américaines, (10), pp. 13–31.

19. Malečková, J. (2021) “The Turk” in the Czech Imagination (1870s-1923). Leiden; Boston: BRILL. https://doi. org/10.1163/9789004440791

20. Mehnert, E. (2015) ‘Vorwort der Herausgeberin’, in Ausgewählte Schriften zur Vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft. Berlin: Frank & Timme, pp. 11–28.

21. Oral, T. (2018) ‘Multicultural Imagery in Andrei Ivanovʼs “Scandinavian Trilogy”: Narrating the Refugee Point of View’, in Imagology Profiles: The Dynamics of National Imagery in Literature. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 135–153.

22. Polyakov, O. (2014) ‘On the Formation and Development of the Categorial Structure of Imagology’, Vestnik Vâtskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, (9), pp. 125–134. (In Russian).

23. Polyakov, O. (2015) ‘J. Leerssen on the Representations of National Images in a Cultural System’, Znanie Ponimanie Umenie, (3), pp. 162–168. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2015.3.13

24. Polyakova, O. A. (2016) ‘Beginnings of Russian Imagology’, Scientific-methodological electronic journal ‘Concept’, (7), pp. 156–163. (In Russian).

25. Porshneva, A. S. (2020) ‘LION FEUCHTWANGER’S BAVARIA: PROVINCIAL IDENTITY IN SUCCESS’, Imagologiya i komparativistika, (13), pp. 141–172. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/24099554/13/9

26. Ryabchikova, E. E. (2018) ‘Imagology as a Part of Comparative Literature Studies’, Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 9(2), pp. 52–59. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2018-2-4

27. Schmidt, H. (2015) ‘Hugo Dyserinck: Ausgewählte Schriften zur Vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft’, Brünner Hefte zu Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 8(1), pp. 65–67.

28. Schmidt, H. (2018) Das ‘Aachener Programm’ der Komparatistik Hugo Dyserincks imagologische Version der Vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft. Berlin: Frank & Timme.

29. Świderska, M. (2013) ‘Comparativist Imagology and the Phenomenon of Strangeness’, CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2387

30. Szczypa, P. (2021) Irish Stereotype in American Cinema. Boston: BRILL. https://doi. org/10.1163/9789004467972

31. Trykov, V. P. (2015) ‘Imagology and Imagopoetics’, Znanie Ponimanie Umenie, (3), pp. 120–129. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2015.3.10

32. Uriadova, A. (2020) ‘The historical imagology: subject and object of perception’, Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, 11(2), pp. 167–174. https://doi.org/10.31648/pw.6499

33. Voltrová, M. (2015) Terminologie, Methodologie und Perspektiven der komparatistischen Imagologie. Berlin: Frank & Timme.

34. Yurchenko, T. G. (2020) ‘Imagologiia: voprosy teorii [Imagology: questions of theory]’, Socialʹnye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otečestvennaâ i zarubežnaâ literatura. Seriâ 7, Literaturovedenie, (4), pp. 13–19. (In Russian).

35. Zelenka, M. (2016) ‘A Comparatist Perspective in Intercultural Research and Imagology’, Porównania, 19, pp. 21–31. https://doi.org/10.14746/p.2016.19.10263

36. Zhdanov, S. S. (2020) ‘German Borders and Germany as a Boundary: Images of the Liminal Space in the Russian Literature of the Late 18th – Early 20th Centuries’, Imagologiya i komparativistika, (14), pp. 186–209. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/24099554/14/9


Review

For citations:


Bakhareva M.D. Modern Imagology: Significance and Development Prospects. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2022;6(2):86-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-2-22-86-101

Views: 1167


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)