Zheng Xiaoyun`s Theory of Cultural Identity
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-3-23-7-21
Abstract
This article is an analysis of the theory of cultural identity by Zheng Xiaoyun, a distinguished Chinese philosopher. His theory of cultural identity presented here gives a new perspective to the study of cultural identity. Zheng Xiaoyun's work The Theory of Cultural Identity has won recognition with Chinese academia and has been widely cited there, yet it is little known abroad, Russian academic thought included. Zheng Xiaoyun investigates the relations between cultural and national identities, stating that culture revolves around cultural identity. He comes to the conclusion that cultural and national identities are determined by the cultural development of individuals and society in general (horizontal determination) as well as by the global identity coming into being (vertical determination). His novel ideas and insights add to the academic discussion of the problems of identity. The comparison of Zheng Xiaoyun’s ideas and the theories of Russian and foreign researchers shows notable distinctions: western authors tend to look into psychological aspects of identity, Russian research focuses on its cultural dimension, whereas in China maintaining one’s cultural identity in a changing world is the key problem of identity research. In his works Zheng Xiaoyun studies the functionilg of cultural identity in an alias language environment and explores how strong national identity and values determine the life of a group. Key topics in Chinese identity research today, such as regional identity and Asian identity, call for an in-depth analysis of national and cultural identity and tap from the works of Zheng Xiaoyun. The comparative analysis has proved that his ideas on determining the foundations, mechanisms and types of cultural identity corresponds with other academic traditions. However, Zheng Xiaoyun’s study outlined in this article brings about novel structural approaches to the analysis of the dynamics of identity creation. Following on from the principles of historicity and objectivity, the philosopher develops the basic prerequisites for combining structural and cognitive approaches in studies of modern national and global identities.
About the Authors
Yanan Chen
Transbaikal State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yanan Chen — PhD student, Department of Philosophy
30, Aleksandro- Zavodskaya street, Chita, Russia, 672039
M. N. Fomina
Transbaikal State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina N. Fomina — Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Professor of the Department of Philosophy
30, Aleksandro- Zavodskaya street, Chita, Russia, 672039
References
1. Ananyina, D. A. et al. (2019) Religioznaya i etnicheskaya identichnost’ etnoforov v usloviyakh etnokul’turnogo konflikta (naprimere uygurskogo etnosa SUAR KNR) [Religious and Ethnic Identity of Ethnophors in Conditions of Ethnocultural Conflict (on the Example of the Uighur Ethnos ofthe Xinjiang People's Republic of China. Chita: ZabGU Publ. (In Russian).
2. Apollonov, I. A. and Tarba, I. D. (2017) ‘The problem of the grounds of ethno-cultural identity in the context of globalization’, Voprosy Filosofii, (8), pp. 30–42. (In Russian).
3. Castelló, M. et al. (2021) ‘What perspectives underlie “researcher identity”? A review of two decades of empirical studies’, Higher Education, 81(3), pp. 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00557-8
4. Chen, Y.-W. and Mendy, M. G. (2021) ‘Cultural Identity’, in Communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199756841-0254
5. Coseru, C. (2017) ‘Consciousness, Personal Identity, and the Self/No-Self Debate’, Voprosy Filosofii, (10), pp. 130–140. (In Russian).
6. Fedotova, N. N. (2006) ‘Multiculturalism and Politics of Development’, Journal of sociology and social anthropology, 9(3), pp. 75–92. (In Russian).
7. Goncharova, I. K. and Lipets, E. Y. (2019) ‘On defining the concept cultural identity in the context of globalisation’, Kulʹtura i civilizaciâ, (1A), pp. 13–18. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25799/AR.2019.44.1.002
8. Gurevich, P. S. (2010) ‘Problema identichnosti cheloveka v filosofskoy antropologii [The problem of human identity in philosophical anthropology]’, Voprosy socialʹnoj teorii, 4, pp. 63–87. (In Russian).
9. He, Shengda. (2018) ‘Wenhua rentong yu Zhongguo tong zhoubian dongnanya guojia minxin xiangtong [Cultural Identity and People-to-People Connectivity between China and Its Neighboring Southeast Asian Countries]’, Yunnan shehui kexue Yunnan Social Sciences, (06), pp. 179–181. (In Chinese)
10. Ishutina, Y. A. (2006) ‘The Functioning of the Systems of the Institution of the Chinese Nation in the Period of Global Threats’, Russia and the Pacific, (3), pp. 67–71. (In Russian).
11. Kazakova, G. M. (2022) ‘Regional Identity: Poliparadigmality of Reading’, Journal of Siberian Federal University Humanities & Social Sciences, 15(6), pp. 762–768. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0828
12. Kondakov, I. V., Sokolov, K. B. and Khrenov, N. A. (2011) Tsivilizatsionnaya identichnost’ v perekhodnuyu epokhu: kul’turologicheskiy, sotsiologicheskiy i iskusstvovedcheskiy aspekty [Civilizational Identity in the Transitional Era: Cultural, Sociological and Art History Aspects]. Moscow: Progress-Tradition Publ. (In Russian).
13. Kuchinskaya, T. N. (2011) ‘Sociocultural Identity of China in the Epoch of Globalization’, Vestnik of the Buryat State University, (14), pp. 149–153. (In Russian).
14. Luyckx, K. et al. (2011) ‘Processes of Personal Identity Formation and Evaluation’, in Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. New York: Springer New York, pp. 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_4
15. cultural identity: conceptual approaches]’, The Humanities and social sciences, (5), pp. 226–234. (In Russian).
16. Melnikova, L. V. (2010) ‘Problema kul’turnoy identichnosti: kontseptual’nyye podkhody [The problem of
17. Merkushina, Y. S. (2013) ‘Cultural Identity of Modern Chinese Society’, Discussion, (7), pp. 149–153. (In Russian).
18. Mezhuev, V. M. (2011) Istoriya, tsivilizatsiya, kul’tura: opyt filosofskogo istolkovaniya [History, civilization, culture: the experience of philosophical interpretation]. Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy gumanitarnyy universitet profsoyuzov Publ. (In Russian).
19. Petrucijova, J. (2010) ‘In the Trace of Human Identity’, Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(4), pp. 615–624.
20. Schwartz, S. J., Luyckx, K. and Vignoles, V. L. (eds) (2011) Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9
21. Smith, P. B. (2011) ‘Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Identity’, in Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. New York: Springer New York, pp. 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_11
22. Zamaraeva, Y. S. and Koptseva, N. P. (2020) ‘History of Complex Identity Research’, Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 13(7), pp. 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-13700637
23. Zhang, X. (2021) ‘Quanqiuhua shidai de wenhua rentong: Xifang pubian zhuyi huayu de lishi fansi [Cultural Identity in the Age of Globalization: Historical Reflections on Western Universalist Discourse]. Shanghai: Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chuban shè Publ. (In Chinese).
24. Zheng, X. (1992) Wen hua ren tong lun[Cultural Identity Theory]. Beijing: Zhong guo she hui kexue chu ban she Publ. (In Chinese).
25. Zheng, X. (2018) Wen hua ren tong lun [Cultural Identity Theory]. Beijing: Zhong guo she hui kexue chu ban she Publ. (In Chinese).
26. Qu, L.(ed) (2013) ‘Lishi wenhua rentong yu Zhongguo tong yi duo minzu guojia (taozhuang gong 5 ce) [Historical and Cultural Identity and China's Unified Multi-ethnic Country: in 5 vol.], Shijiazhuang: Shijiazhuang: Hebei renmin chubanshe Publ. (In Chinese).
27. Qu, M. (2018) ‘Dangdai Zhongguo wenhua rentong yanjiu de qushi [Trends in Contemporary Chinese Cultural Identity Research]’, Yunnan shehui kexue Yunnan Social Sciences, (06), pp. 185–186. (in Chinese)
28. Acharya, A. (2014) Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315796673
29. Baba, G. (2016) ‘Regional Commonalities and Regional Identities: Forging a Normative Understanding of Southeast Asian Identity’, Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(1), pp. 91–121. https://doi. org/10.1177/186810341603500104
30. Chen, M. (2014) Makesizhuyishi ye de ‘min zu ren tong’ wen tiyan jiu [Research on National Identity from the Perspective of Marxism]. Beijing: Zhongguo she hui kexue chu ban she Publ. (In Chinese).
31. Chen, Z. (2012) Qian xi, jia xiangyu ren tong : Wen hua bi jiaoshi ye xia de haiwaihua ren yan jiu [Migration, Hometown and Identity: Overseas Chinese Studies from the Perspective of Cultural Comparison]. Beijing: Shang wu yin shu guan Publ. (In Chinese).
32. Liu, H. (ed.) (2008) Wen hua zi jueyu wen hua ren tong : dong yashijiao [Cultural consciousness and cultural identity]. Shanghai: Shanghai waiyujiaoyu chu ban she Publ. (In Chinese).
33. Xu, J., Liu, B. and Luo, S. (2014) Zhong hua min zu ren tong lun [The Theory of Chinese National Identity]. Yinchuan: Ning xia ren min chu ban she Publ. (In Chinese).
34. Xue, Y. (2016) Dang daiZhongguozhuliu wen hua ren tong yan jiu [A study on mainstream culture identity in contemporary China]. Beijing: She hui kexue wen xian chu ban she Publ. (In Chinese).
Review
For citations:
Chen Ya., Fomina M.N. Zheng Xiaoyun`s Theory of Cultural Identity. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2022;6(3):7-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-3-23-7-21
Views:
1951
Email this article 