Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

Human Rights Mechanisms in Latin America from the Perspective of Intersection of Regional and Universal Human Rights Concepts

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-3-23-68-82

Abstract

The article analyzes the intersection of universal and regional human rights concepts in Latin America. The regional approach to human rights protection has been proposed by anthropologists who argue that cultural relativism is the basis for the development of the concept of human rights protection. The evolution of human rights is examined by scholars through the prism of both cultural relativism and universalism. While proponents of the first approach assert the importance of cultural and civilizational particularities, proponents of universalism promote the idea of universal morality. The novelty of this study lies in the examination of a different academic approach to human rights protection that encompasses features of both of the aforementioned concepts in order to provide a more objective picture of the current state of the system of human rights protection. The interaction of these concepts is demonstrated through the example of the system for the protection of women's rights in Latin America, as well as of the rights of other vulnerable groups such as indigenous peoples. This leads to the conclusion that both the universalist and the regionalist approaches to human rights protection are mutually supportive. Furthermore, universal and local moral systems borrow elements from each other despite the contradictions between them. In general, the interaction between universalization and regionalization of human rights is clearly visible in Latin America. The elaboration of a new approach that incorporates the features of the two old ones is necessary in order to better understand this process, since human rights protection is acquiring new features that fit into the so-called paradigm of relative universalism. An explanatory model to account for this phenomenon is needed for better understanding of the common patterns of the process.

About the Author

N. A. Sheremet
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Natalya A. Sheremet — PhD student, The International Law Department

76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, Russia, 119454



References

1. Abashidze, A. K. and Sheremet, N. A. (2021) ‘Indigenous Peoples’ Special Relationship with Traditional Territories (the case of the Ava Guaraní people v. Republic of Paraguay)’, International legal courier, (7), pp. 9–16. (In Russian).

2. Bard Wigdor, G. (2017) ‘"El ajuste tiene rostro de mujer”: A 20 años de la plataforma de Beijing, las desigualdades se profundizan’, Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos, 27(2), p. 21. https://doi. org/10.15359/rldh.27-2.1

3. Bekyashev, D. K. and Mikrina, V. G. (2016) ‘Some Features of International Legal Framework for the Protection of Women’s Labour Rights’, Moscow journal of international law, (4), pp. 82–92.

4. Chacón Mata, A. M. (2011) ‘El Relativismo cultural y su tutela jurídica en el sistema internacional de protección de los derechos humanos’, Revista latinoamericana de derechos humanos, 22(2), pp. 39–79.

5. Fukuyama, F. (1989) ‘The End of History?’, The National Interest, (16), pp. 3–18.

6. Hogemann, E. R. (2020) ‘Human Rights beyond Dichotomy between Cultural Universalism and Relativism’, The Age of Human Rights Journal, (14), pp. 19–36. https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v14.5476

7. Johansson Dahre, U. (2017) ‘Searching for a middle ground: anthropologists and the debate on the universalism and the cultural relativism of human rights’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(5), pp. 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1290930

8. Kant, I. (1785) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Riga: Hartknoch. (Russ. ed.: (1994) ‘Osnovopolozheniya metafiziki nravov’, in Sochineniya v 8 t. T. 4. Moscow: Choro Publ., pp. 153–245).

9. Kartashkin, V. A. (2019) Prava cheloveka i printsipy mezhdunarodnogo prava v XXI veke [Human rights and principles of international law in the 21st century]. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M Publ. (In Russian).

10. Lukasheva, E. A. (2009) Chelovek, pravo, tsivilizatsiya: normativno-tsennostnoye izmereniye [Man, Law, Civilization: Normative-Value Dimension]. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M Publ. (In Russian).

11. Merkushev, V. N. (2005) Prava cheloveka v kontekste kulʹturnykh razlichiy: sravnitelʹnyy analiz sovremennykh politologicheskiy kontseptsiy [Human rights in the context of cultural differences: a comparative analysis of modern political science concepts]. Ekaterinburg: In-t filosofii i prava UrO RAN Publ. (In Russian).

12. Merry, S. E. (1992) ‘Anthropology, Law, and Transnational Processes’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, pp. 357–379.

13. Moore, S. P. et al. (2014) ‘Cancer in indigenous people in Latin America and the Caribbean: a review’, Cancer Medicine, 3(1), pp. 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.134

14. Polutova, M. (2013) ‘Methodological Approaches of Foreign Scientists to the Theory of Feminism: Origin, Development, Main Directions’, Zabaikalsky State University journal, (11), pp. 66–79. (In Russian).

15. Ruiloba Alvariño, J. (2007) ‘Los Pactos Internacionales de las Naciones Unidas de 16 de diciembre de 1966’, in Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos. Madrid: Dilex, pp. 115–176.

16. Smirnov, A. V. (2001) ‘Nominal'nost' i soderzhatel'nost': pochemu nekriticheskoye issledovaniye universaliy kul'tury grozit zabluzhdeniyem [Nominality and meaningfulness: why an uncritical study of the "universals of culture" threatens with delusion]’, in Universalii vostochnykh kul'tur [Universals of Oriental Cultures]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura Publ., pp. 290–317. (In Russian).

17. Shemyakin, Y. (2015) ‘Volviendo Al tema de Los derechos humanos. Criterio de UN latinoamericanista’, Iberoamerica, (3), pp. 33–55.

18. Shemyakin, Y. G. (2018) ‘The Theme of the Human Rights in the Context of the Problemm of Identity: the Latin American Approaches’, Latinskaia Amerika, (3), pp. 5–19.


Review

For citations:


Sheremet N.A. Human Rights Mechanisms in Latin America from the Perspective of Intersection of Regional and Universal Human Rights Concepts. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2022;6(3):68-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-3-23-68-82

Views: 647


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)