Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

Splendor and Misery of the Anthropological Crisis: A Myth of Contemporary Russian Philosophy

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-4-24-7-14

Abstract

The concept of anthropological crisis is very popular in contemporary Russian humanities: the Russian Scientific Electronic Library, or Elibrary.ru, includes more than ten thousand publications with the keyword anthropological crisis. On the contrary, Google gives links to Russian publications only when one searches for anthropological crisis. This keyword has no reference in the famous online book catalogue Worldcat.org. Nowadays English-speaking scientific communities still explore the crisis in anthropology as a discipline. The difference between the anthropological crisis and the crisis in anthropology seems essential. The crisis of a scientific discipline is not a crisis of the human nature. The modern Russian academicians, including the late Vyacheslav Stepin, find many features of the anthropological crisis in the successes of genetic engineering and modern medicine as well as in the growing psychological pressures. Russian-language scholars find the traits of anthropological crisis in many fields, including studies of memory, bioethics, pedagogics, literature, and economics. The loss of the sense of life is often treated by Russian scholars, like Stepin and Boris Pruzhinin, as a trait of the anthropological crisis. The problems of self-identity are also marked by Russian authors as a mark of that crisis. Sergey Averintsev felt that human beings lack their human nature. Pruzhinin supposes humans cannot predict consequences of genetic engineering for their nature as a species. But all these trends have nothing in common with the anthropological crisis. Genetic engineering helps improving of sick human nature and self-realization. Certainly, all consequences are not open but there is no scientific discovery whose effects would be absolutely evident at once. Cyborgs are an inevitable step towards healthier and smarter humans. Existential problems are universal since the emergence of self-consciousness among the humans. Self-identities are in constant flux since the birth of complex societies, especially since the industrial revolution strengthened alienation. The growth and volume of information flows are not threats to humans as there is no necessity to memorize all the data in the world, and there are multiple network and personal filters which block garbage. The anthropological crisis seems a myth in contemporary Russian-language humanities in general and philosophy in particular.

About the Author

A. O. Zakharov
Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow State University of Psychology & Education
Russian Federation

Anton O. Zakharov — Doctor of History, Leading Research Fellow (Southeast Asia, Australia and Pacific), Institute of Oriental Studies; Professor at the Universitywide Department of Philosophy and the Humanities

12, Rozhdestvenka str., Moscow, Russia, 107031; 29, Sretenka str., Moscow, Russia, 127051



References

1. Beck, U. (2015) Weltrisikogesellschaft: auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (Edition zweite Moderne).

2. Beck, U. (2016) Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

3. Boronoeva, N. A. (2013) ‘Antropologicheskiy krizis v kontekste globalizatsii [Anthropological crisis in the context of globalization]’, Aktualnye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk, (5), pp. 202–207. (In Russian).

4. Eriksen, T. H. (2001) Øyeblikkets tyranni. Oslo: Aschehoud. (Russ. ed.: (2003) Tiraniya momenta: Vremya v epokhu informatsii. Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ.).

5. Kamalieva, I. R. (2018) ‘Anthropological crisis in modern medicine’, Philosophy and Culture, 5(5), pp. 65–70. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0757.2018.5.26164

6. Kolyadko, I. N. (2022) ‘Anthropological Crisis of Technogenic Civilization: Parameters and Perspectives of Overcome’, Voprosy Filosofii, pp. 76–80. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-76-80

7. Korol, A. D. (2021) ‘Anthropological Crisis in the Social Realities of the 21st Century’, Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 64(5), pp. 45–56. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-5-45-56

8. Krokhina, N. P. (2020) ‘Anthropological Crisis in the Reception of Russian Literature of the Late Twentieth Century’, Noosfernye issledovaniâ, (2), pp. 78–83. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.46724/NOOS.2020.2.78-83

9. Lomako, O. M. (2019) ‘Anthropological Crisis in The Risk Society: Philosophical Analysis’, RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 23(1), pp. 66–73. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2019-23-1-66-73

10. Pruzhinin, B. I. (2022) ‘Anthropological Crisis as a Theme of Philosophy’, Voprosy Filosofii, pp. 86–92. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-86-92

11. Rybakov, S. and Stepanov, I. I. (2021) ‘Postmodernism in Pedagogy as a Reflection of the Fundamental Anthropological Crisis’, Duhovno-nravstvennoe vospitanie, (4), pp. 3–8. (In Russian).

12. Sabancheev, R. Y. (2022) ‘The Phenomenon of Memory in the Era of the Crisis of Technogenic Civilization’, Voprosy Filosofii, pp. 71–75. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-71-75

13. Sokolova, S. N. (2021) ‘The Anthropological Crisis: Human Security and Society During the Pandemic’, Vestnik Polesskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriâ obŝestvennyh i gumanitarnyh nauk, (1), pp. 74–80. (In Russian).

14. Stepin, V. S. (2011) Tsivilizatsiya i kul’tura [Civilization and Culture]. Saint Petersburg: SPbGUP Publ. (In Russian).

15. Sugrobova, Y. Y., Karpova, I. D. and Dorofei, Y. O. (2020) ‘The parameters of anthropological crisis and modern global generation’, Man and Culture, (6), pp. 22–34. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25136/24098744.2020.6.34308

16. Terekhin, E. L. (2022) ‘Search for New Types of Scientific Rationality in an Anthropological Crisis: a Relativistic Approach’, Voprosy Filosofii, pp. 81–86. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-381-85

17. Zhelnin, A. I. (2015) ‘Information Dimension of Anthropologic Crisis of Civilization (to the Information Impact on a Person, Human Psychology and Biology)’, Informacionnoe obŝestvo, (6), pp. 35–41. (In Russian).

18. Zvonok, A. A. (2021) ‘Modern Science and Education: Anthropological Crisis’, Vestnik Luganskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Ser. 1: Pegagogicheskie nauki. Ovrazovanie, 64(2), pp. 5–9. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Zakharov A.O. Splendor and Misery of the Anthropological Crisis: A Myth of Contemporary Russian Philosophy. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2022;6(4):7-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-4-24-7-14

Views: 571


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)