Sobornost as a Form of Ontology of Culture in the Works of V . Solovyov, P . Florensky, S . Bulgakov, N . Berdyaev through the Prism of Hegel’s Dialectic

The article examines the development of approaches to the category of sobornost (spiritual community of people), stated in the works of V. Solovyov, in the works of P. Florensky, S. Bulgakov, N. Berdyaev. This essay traces the evolvement of sobornost from abstraction to definition by means of Hegel’s dialectic. The process of dialectic development is projected onto modern life through philosophic polylogue that includes symbolic interpretation of the language of Russian religious philosophy of the 19th–20th centuries. Sobornost is interpreted as a specific ontology of culture enfolding itself in religious, secular, and religious-secular communality. Thus, with Hegel’s triads in mind we can build on the unity and self-identity of sobornost at the level of religious communality. For secular communality with its duality, sobornost is mediated and reversed. Though duality of sobornost is not substantial and it unites general and particular into religious-secular communality as the most concrete form of its actualization. Each communality type means a specific form of presentation of sobornost in language and shows itself in the texts through religious philosophemes (symbols). For example, wandering (S. N. Bulgakov) and self-sacrifice (P. Florensky, N. A. Berdyaev) indicate religious communality. They are characterized by religious hyper-asceticism, mono-ideism, atemporality, martyrdom, and chosenness. Whereas heroism (S. N. Bulgakov, P. Florensky) implies maximalism of causes and means, individualism, chosenness, collectivity, political mono-ideism, martyrdom and points to secular communality. All three symbols of religious and secular communalities have common features: atemporality, eschatologism, the idea of chosenness, mono-ideism, martyrdom and Messianism with different actualization in each of the communalities. The third type of communality combining both religious and secular demonstrates all three symbols of sobornost. Herein these symbols are associated with humility, personal maximalism of actions, religious conscience, historicity, and freedom. In this way an individual is always placed in the dimension of sobornost and cannot be regarded out of it. The establishment of sobornost leads to spiritual totality of the divine-humanity.

1. Antonyuk, E. Y. et al. (2020) Intellektual’noye izmereniye ontologii kul’tury [Intellectual measurement of the ontology of culture]. Saratov: Saratovskiy istochnik Publ. (In Russian).

2. Berdyaev, N. A. (2008a) Novoe Srednevekov'e. [New Middle Ages]. Moscow: Direct-Media Publ. (In Russian).

3. Berdyaev, N. A. (2008b) Carstvo Duha i carstvo Kesarya. Carstvo Duha i carstvo Kesarya. [The Kingdom of the Spirit and the Kingdom of Caesar]. Moscow: Direct-Media Publ. (In Russian).

4. Berdyaev, N. A. (2008c) Ekzistencial'naya dialektika bozhestvennogo i chelovecheskogo. [Existential dialectic of the divine and the human]. Moscow: Direct-Media Publ. (In Russian).

5. Berdyaev, N. A. (2015) Izbrannye filosofskie sochineniya 1920-h gg. [Selected philosophical writings of the 1920s]. Moscow; Berlin: Direct-Media Publ. (In Russian).

6. Bulgakov, S. N. (1993). Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T.1. Filosofiya khozyaystva. Tragediya filosofía [Works in two volumes. Vol.1. Philosophy of economy. The tragedy of philosophy]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

7. Bulgakov, S. N. (2008) Dva grada: issledovaniya o prirode obshchestvennyh idealov. [Two Cities: Research on the Nature of Social Ideals]. Moscow: Astrel Publ. (In Russian).

8. Bulgakov, S. N. (2011) Pravoslavie. Ocherki ucheniya Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi [Orthodoxy. Essays on the teachings of the Orthodox Church]. Minsk: Publishing House of the Belarusian Exarchate. (In Russian).

9. Florensky, P. A. (1990) Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny [The Pillar and Statement of Truth]. Moscow: Pravda Publ. (In Russian).

10. Florensky, P. A. (1996) Sochineniya: v 4 t. T. 2 [Works: in 4 vol. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Mysl Publ. (In Russian). Friauf, V. A. (2006) ‘The East-orthodox Tradition and Russian Philosophy of Name’, Izvestiya of Saratov

11. University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 6(1–2), pp. 57–61. (In Russian).

12. Friauf, V. A. (2010) ‘The Language Paradigm of Russian Philosophy’, Izvestiya of Saratov University.

13. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 10(3), pp. 49–55. (In Russian).

14. Friauf, V. A. (2011) ‘Language, Metaphysics and Russian Idea’, Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy.

15. Psychology. Pedagogy, 11(3), pp. 62–66. (In Russian).

16. Friauf, V. A. (2016) ‘Symbolical forms of initial language and cult’, Paradigma (Sankt-Peterburg), (23), pp. 7–25. (In Russian).

17. Gayda, F. (2022) ‘“Sobornost”: On the Question of the Meaning of the Concept in the 19th – 30-ies 20th Centuries’, Philosophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 6(1), pp. 17–40. (In Russian). https://doi. org/10.17323/2587-8719-2022-1-17-40

18. Habermas, J. (2005) Dialektik der Säkularisierung: über Vernunft und Religion. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. (Russ. ed.: (2006) Dialektika sekulyarizacii: o razume i religii. Moscow: Bibleyskobogoslovskiy in-t sv. apostola Andreya Publ.).

19. Habermas, J. (2008) ‘Notes on Post-Secular Society’, New Perspectives Quarterly, 25(4), pp. 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2008.01017.x

20. Heath, J. (2021) ‘On Sergii Bulgakov’s The Tragedy of Philosophy*’, Modern Theology, 37(3), pp. 805–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12676

21. Khomyakov, A. S. (1994). Sochineniya v 2 tomah. T. 2. Raboty po bogosloviyu. [Works in 2 volumes. Vol. 2. Works on Theology]. Moscow, Moskovskij filosofskij fond: Medium. (In Russian).

22. Krasicki, J. (2010) ‘“The tragedy” of German philosophy. Remarks on reception of German philosophy in the Russian religious thought (of S. Bulgakov and others)’, Studies in East European Thought, 62(1), pp. 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-010-9100-4

23. Lossky, V. N. (2006) Bogovidenie. [Vision of God]. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).

24. Malinov, A. (2017) ‘Philosophy of polylogue’, Philosophical polylogue, (1), pp. 7–11. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31119/phlog.2017.1.1

25. Nazarova, O. A. (2016) ‘Koncepciya interkul'turnoj filosofii i ee vozmozhnaya recepciya v kontekste issledovaniya russkoj filosofii [The concept of intercultural philosophy and its possible reception in the context of the study of Russian philosophy]’, Myslʹ (Sankt-Peterburg), 20, pp. 7–18. (In Russian).

26. Orlov, M. O. (2008) ‘Mesto i rol' religii v global'nyh processah sovremennosti. [The role of spiritual enlightenment in the formation of Russian religiosity: A historical and philosophical analysis]’, Vlast', (4), pp. 91–94. (In Russian).

27. Posacki, A. (2021) ‘„Sobornost’” jako idealny model „solidarności mistycznej” w kulturze rosyjskiej’, in Solidarność: człowiek w sieci zależności społecznych. Kraków: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe, pp. 203–214. https://doi.org/10.15633/9788374389952.15

28. Rozhkov, V. P. (2009) ‘Methodological Basis of «New Religious Consciousness» in V.S. Solovyov’s Philosophy’, Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 9(4), pp. 49–55. (In Russian).

29. Solovyov, V. C. (1989) Sochineniya v 2 t. T.2. Chteniya o bogochelovechestve; Filosofskaya publitsistika [Works in 2 vol. Vol.2. Readings on God-manhood; Philosophical journalism]. Moscow: Pravda Publ. (In Russian).

30. Solovyov, V. C. (2012) Rossiya i vselenskaya cerkov'. Russkaya ideya. Talmud i novejshaya polemicheskaya literatura o nem v Avstrii i Germanii. [Russia and the Ecumenical Church. Russian idea. Talmud and the latest polemical literature about him in Austria and Germany]. Moscow: Direkt-Media Publ. (In Russian).

31. Wimmer, F. M. (1990) Interkulturelle Philosophie. Wien: Passagen Verlag.