The Theory of Suprematism and the Event: The Search for the Possibility of Transformation

This article proposes to revise the established research approach to Suprematism as a utopian futuristic project. The conceptual analysis of the texts created by K. Malevich (1879–1935) in the period from 1915 to 1922 and devoted to pointlessness has shown that the theory of Suprematism can be viewed as a kind of synthesis of ideas of the fourth dimension (Ch. H. Hinton) and the evolution of human consciousness (P. Ouspensky). It makes it possible to regard the principles of the theory of suprematism through the prism of the concept of the Event. Though the term itself was never used by K. Malevich, the idea of a new way of seeing and a flash of the reason that leads to the possibility of subjective transformation are in line with the meaning of the Event, as seen in philosophical and esoteric thought. The article puts forward the thesis according to which K. Malevich was exposed to these ideas in the atmosphere of spiritual quests of the 1910s and early 1920s. K. Malevich, M. Matyushin, and A. Kruchenykh took part in the production of the opera Victory over the Sun which served as a venue of creative interaction and an outlet for creative approaches and conceptual reinterpretation. Here one can clearly see the logical isomorphism of the artistic practice of the opera creators, based on a specific interpretation of time and the idea of the evolution of consciousness, and those ideas that underlay the esotericism of their time. Another indirect argument in favor of the thesis about the presumed parallelism of the theory of K. Malevich and the concept of the Event is the performative nature of the texts written by the author of the Black Square. According to K. Malevich, through overcoming meaning as the victory over reason and objectivity, the gap between the modus of postulating the possibility of transformation and the real experience of the sense of immortality. This also points to the similarity of his ideas and the esoteric project of irrational cognition and control over the mysterious. Thus, Suprematism can be interpreted as the Event of subjective transformation, and the theory of Suprematism can be viewed as a tool that allows one to experience a sense of immortality, accessible to both the creator and the viewer, who develop the creative will for the future.

1. Badiou, A. (2010) La philosophie et l’evenement. Paris: Germina. (Russ. ed.: (2016) Filosofija i sobytie. Besedy s kratkim vvedeniem v filosofiju Alain Badiou. Moscow: Institut obshestvennyh issledovanij Publ.).

2. Chubarov, I. M. (2016) Kollektivnaja chuvstvennost’. Teorija i praktika levogo avangarda [The Collektive Sensibility. Theories and Practices of the Left Avant-Garde]. Moscow: Natsional’nyy issledovatel’skiy universitet Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki Publ. (In Russian).

3. Deleuze, G. (1969) Logique du sens. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit. (Russ. ed.: (2015) Logika smysla. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ.).

4. Falikov, B. Z. (2017) Velichina kachestva. Okkul’tizm, religija Vostoka i iskusstvo XX veka [Magnitude of quality. Occultism, Religion of The East and Art of XX Century]. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ. (In Russian).

5. Glazov-Corrigan, E. (2013) Art after philosophy: Boris Pasternak’s early prose. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. (Russ. ed.: (2021) Ot filosofii k proze. Ranniy Pasternak. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ.).

6. Goryacheva, T. V (2020) Teorija i praktika rasskogo avangarda: Kaimir Malevich i ego shkola [Theory and Practika of the Russian Avant-Garde Kazimir Malevich and His School]. Moscow: AST, Vremena Publ. (In Russian).

7. Henderson, L. D. (2013) The Fourth and Non-Euclidean geometry in Modern Art. Cambridge: MIT Press.

8. Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W. (1944) Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente. Amsterdam: Querido. (Russ. ed.: (1997) Dialektika Prosveshcheniya. Filosofskiye fragmenty. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Medium; Juventa Publ.).

9. Isachenko, N. N. (2014) ‘The Idea of «Superman» in Philosophical Discourse’, Fundamental research, (11–9), pp. 2086–2089. (In Russian).

10. Kant, I. (1781) Critik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: Verlegts Johann Friedrich Hartknoch. (Russ. ed.: (2006) Kritika chistogo razuma. Moscow: Exmo Publ.).

11. Krusanov, A. V (2010) Russkiy avangard: 1907–1932: istoricheskiy obzor: v 3 t. T. 1. Kn. 1: Boyevoye desyatiletiye [Russian avant-garde: 1907–1932: a historical review: in 3 vol. Vol. 1. Book 1: Combat Decade]. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ. (In Russian).

12. Losev, A. F. (1994) Problema hudozhestvennogo stilja [Art Style Problem]. Kiev: Collegium; Kievskaja akademija evrobiznesa Publ. (In Russian).

13. Malevich, K. S. (2018) Chernyj kvadrat [Black Square]. Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russian).

14. Nietzsche, F. (1883) Also sprach Zarathustra. Leipzig: Fritzsch. (Russ. ed.: (1996) ‘Tak govoril Zaratustra’, in Sochinenia: v 2 t. T. 2. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., p. 5–237).

15. Ouspensky, P. D. (2022) Tertium organum. Kljuch k zagadrfmi mira [Tertium organum. The Key to The Mysteries of The Wold]. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: T8 Izdatel’skie tehnologii; Pal’mira Publ. (In Russian).

16. Scheijen, S. (2019) De avant-gardisten. De Russische Revolutie in de kunst, 1917-1935. Amsterdam: Prometheus.. (Russ. ed.: (2019) Avangardisty russkaja revoljucija v iskusstve. 1917–1935. Moscow: KoLibri: Azbuka-Attikus Publ.).

17. Vakar, I. (2020) ‘Dissolution of the Object: Impressionist Traditions in the Russian Avant-Garde’, in Impressionism in Russia. Dawn of the AvantGarde. Munich; London; New York: PRESTEL, pp. 74–85. (Russ. ed.: (2022) ‘Ot tradicii impressionizma v zhivopisi russkogo avangarda’, in Lyudi i izmy: k istorii avangarga. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., pp. 10–24.).