Politization of Islam in Modern Iran: Autopoiesis of Shiite Tradition?

The article examines the development of politicized Shiite Islam in Iran as a type of autopoiesis (N. Luhmann) of this religious tradition. The topic arises from the actualization of the influence of religion on the life of a number of societies that have relied on technological modernization, as well as the importance that the topic of the optimal combination of modernization and traditional values is acquiring today. The purpose of the study is, based on an analysis of the activities of the Shiite clergy, to characterize the uniqueness of the revaluation of the values of Iranian society in the course of the development of modern philosophy and ideology of Shiism. The objectives of the study were: 1) to systematize the existing scientific approaches to the process of politicization of Shiism in the second half of the 20th – early 21st centuries; 2) consider the connection between political processes and the specific theology of Shiism; 3) reveal the dynamics of the relationship between the values of tradition and modernization in the teachings of Shiite religious figures; 4) clarify the specificities of the stages of influence of Imami Islam on the religious and political life of modern Iran. The research was based on theological and scientific writings of Islamic spiritual leaders, their opponents and followers. The key method used was historical-genetic, which made it possible to analyze the formation of Shiism in Iran in the historical and cultural context; and comparative, with the help of which the specifics of the various stages of the autopoietic formation of Iranian Shiism against the background of other denominations of Shiism and Islam in general were clarified. It has been proven that consideration of the path of development of the philosophical and ideological aspects of Shiism theology from the perspective of N. Luhmann's theory makes it possible to trace not only the external, but also the autochthonous foundations of the complex reverses of this religious model of self-awareness of society; as well as identify and characterize the functional specificity and dynamic characteristics of the process of politicization of Shiism in Iran. In modern Iran, theology influences the consciousness of believers, and, as a consequence, social and political processes, and not vice versa, as is commonly believed in relation to modern societies. The role of Imami Islam (Shiites) in the formation of values and behavioral attitudes during the actual structuring of relations in society turns out to be key for Iran. At the same time, however, this theology contains the potential for historical change: the very theological system changes, starting from its own concepts and transforming them. This constructivist approach turns out to be compatible with the emphasis on traditionalism. The logical possibility of such collaboration in building a new type of society is justified within the framework of the development of the theory of legal guardianship.

1. Alemzadeh, M. (2023) ‘Iran Protests and Patterns of State Repression’, Iranian Studies, 56(3), pp. 557–561. https://doi.org/10.1017/irn.2023.16

2. Amanat, A. (2007) ‘From Ijtihad to Wilayat-i Faqih: The Evolution of Shiite Legal Authority to Political Power’, in Shari’a: Islamic Law in the Contemporary Context. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 120–136.

3. Arminjon-Hachem, C. (2013) Chiisme et Etat. Les Clercs à l’épreuve de la modernité. Paris: CNRS editions.

4. Banai, H. (2020) Hidden Liberalism: Burdened Visions of Progress in Modern Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108850445

5. Belyaev, E. A. (1966) Araby, islam i arabskiĭ halifat v Rannee Srednevekov’e [Arabs, Islam and the Arab Caliphate in the Early Middle Ages]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

6. Doroshenko, E. A. (1998) Shiitskoe duhovenstvo v dvuh revolyuciyah: 1905–1911 i 1978–1979 gg [The Shiite clergy in two revolutions: 1905–1911 and 1978–1979]. Moscow: IV RAN Publ. (In Russian).

7. Enayat, H. (1983) ‘Iran: Khomeini’s Concept of the “Guardianship of the Jurisconsult”’, in Islam in the Political Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 160–180.

8. Galkina, E. S. (2011) ‘The Nation Formation and the Nationalist Movement in Iran’, Vestnik Râzanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni S.A. Esenina, (3), pp. 81–97. (In Russian).

9. Ghamari-Tabrizi, B. (2014) ‘The Divine, the People, and the Faqih’, in A Critical Introduction to Khomeini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998485.012

10. Gryaznevich, P. A. (1960) ‘O znachenii termina ar-rida [On the meaning of the term “ar-rida”]’, in XXV Mezhdunarodnyy kongress vostokovedov. Otchety delegatsii SSSR [XXV International Congress of Orientalists. Reports of the USSR delegation]. Moscow: Izd-vo Vost. Lit. Publ., p. 12-24. (In Russian).

11. Habermas, J. (1996) Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur Politischen Тhеorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Russ. ed.: (2001) Vovlecheniye drugogo: ocherki politicheskikh teoriy. Moscow: Nauka Publ.).

12. Hossainzadeh, N. (2014) ‘Ruhollah Khomeini’s Political Thought: Elements of Guardianship, Consent, and Representative Government’, Journal of Shi’a Islamic Studies, 7(2), pp. 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1353/ isl.2014.0010

13. Jahanbakhsh, F. (2001) Islam, Democracy and Religious Modernism in Iran (1953-2000). Leiden: BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400714

14. Kudryashova, I. V. (2012) ‘Iran as a Case of Islamic Modernization’, Political science, (2), pp. 107–134. (In Russian).

15. Kulyushin, N.D. (2002) ‘The Worlds of the Political and of the Supra-Political in the Iranian Leaders' Views (as Appearing from the Analysis of Texts by Imam Khomeini and by President Katami)’, Polis. Political Studies, (5), pp. 110-116. (In Russian).

16. Leezenberg, M. (2004) ‘Power and Political Spirituality: Michel Foucault on the Islamic Revolution in Iran’, in Michel Foucault and Theology. London: Routledge, pp. 99–115. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315249025 Lloyd, V. (ed.) (2012) Race and Political Theology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

17. Luhmann, N. (1984) Soziale systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Russ. ed.: (2007) Sotsial’nyye sistemy. Ocherk obshchey teorii. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ.).

18. Luizard, P. J. (2014) Histoire politique du clergé chiite: XVIIIe-XXIe siècle. Paris: Fayard.

19. Lukoyanov, A. K. (1989) ‘Mekhdi Bazargan’, in Iranskaya revolyuciya 1978–1979 gg. Prichiny i uroki [Iranian Revolution 1978-1979]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 82–85. (In Russian).

20. Mamedova, N. M. and Sanai, M. (eds) (2001) Iran: Islam i vlast’ [Iran: Islam and Power]. Moscow: IV RAN Publ. (In Russian).

21. Matushanskaya, Y. G. (2012) ‘Social-Philosophical Analysis of Niklas Luhmann Systems Theory’, Kazan State Power Engineering University bulletin, (3), pp. 86–98. (In Russian).

22. Namazi, R. (2019) ‘Ayatollah Khomeini: From Islamic Government to Sovereign State’, Iranian Studies, 52(1–2), pp. 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00210862.2018.1551054

23. Prozorov, S. (1973) ‘Vvedenie [Introduction]’, in Shiitskie sekty [Shia sects]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

24. Ridgeon, L. (2023) Ahmad Qābel and Contemporary Islamic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009322263

25. Ruzanova, V. M. (2019) ‘The Influence of Religion on Society’, Skif. Voprosy studenčeskoj nauki, (5–2), pp. 80–83. (In Russian).

26. Schmitt, С. (1922) Politische Theologie: Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. (Russ. ed.: (2000) Politicheskaya teologiya. Moscow: Kanon-press-TS: Kuchkovo pole Publ.).

27. Soroush, A., Sadri, M. and Sadri, A. (2002) Reason, Freedom, and Democracy in Islam: Essential Writings of Abdolkarim Soroush. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

28. Stepanyants, M. T. (2020) ‘Philosophical and Worldview Grounds of Political Islam of India and Pakistan’, Islam in the modern world, 16(1), pp. 127–146. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22311/2074-1529-2020-16-1-127-146

29. Sulimov, S. I. and Tregubova, D. D. (2019) ‘Shiite Islamism as a Political Factor’, Manuscript, 12(6), pp. 158–161. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2019.6.32

30. Weber, M. (1934) Die protestantische Ethik und der «Geist» des Kapitalismus. Tübingen: Mohr (Russ. ed.: (2006) Izbrannoye: protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ.).

31. Yurtaev, V. I. (1993) Iran: studenty v islamskoj revolyucii [Iran: students in the Islamic revolution]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

32. Žižek, S. (2003) The Puppet and the Dwarf The Perverse Core of Christianity. Frankfurt am Main:

33. Suhrkamp. (Russ. ed.: (2009) Kukla i karlik: Khristianstvo mezhdu yeresyu i buntom. Moscow: Evropa Publ.).