Cultural and Representative Policy of Sweden as an Element of Nation Branding

The article examines the relationship between soft power, nation branding, and educational and cultural cooperation within the framework of the Swedish Institute's policy of international cooperation to promote the country’s image abroad and strengthen the position of its reputational capital. The relevance of addressing this topic is due to the significance of the stated agenda, which, as our research has shown, influenced not only the development of cultural cooperation and academic exchanges, but also the features of building Sweden’s foreign policy image. Based on the analysis of the organization’s materials and data in reports from 2022–2023, the authors aimed to show the process of forming the priorities of the organization’s activities within the framework of the distribution of financial support and the focus of cultural and educational projects. To this end, the role and parameters of building a national brand are analyzed; changes in the topics of educational and cultural events and programs conducted by Sweden in the countries of Eastern Europe and the Baltic region are considered; the dynamics of the processes of cultural exchange between Sweden and these countries are traced; the influence of the current political situation on the volume and measures of financial assistance to them is noted; and the perception of Sweden in Russia, Eastern European and Baltic countries is characterized. The study was based on the methods of comparative analysis, discourse analysis, and case study techniques. It was concluded that in implementing a diverse range of educational and cultural programs, the Swedish Institute adheres to the principle of regionalism, which allows the implementation of such projects, taking into account the interests and needs of both Sweden and partner countries. It was shown that when determining the parameters of national branding, the Swedish Institute relies on the approach of S. Anholt, clarifying it in a number of areas. According to the findings of the study, adaptation of relevant programs for the development of cooperation with partner countries, is aimed at integrating specific Swedish values into the cultural matrix of the host cultures. The global political situation strongly influences the realization of programs, thus causing the exclusion of such an important international partner as Russia. The study confirmed the initial thesis about the relatively slow accumulation of Sweden’s reputational capital, including in the process of the Swedish Institute’s work with ‘promising’ (in the current environment) countries, as well as with the countries of Eastern Europe and the Baltic states. It is further concluded that the Swedish Institute is not only a key actor in the country's cultural and educational policy, as well as a powerful channel of soft power, but also an instrument for Sweden's positioning of itself as a moral superpower, which can be seen in many areas of its policies that go beyond fields of public diplomacy.

1. Åkerlund, A. (2018) ‘The Slow Reunification of Development Assistance and Public Diplomacy: Exchange and Collaboration Activities Through the Swedish Institute 1973–2012’, in Communicating National Image through Development and Diplomacy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783-319-76759-8_7

2. Åkerlund, A. (2020) Regeringsstyrning av svensk offentlig diplomati: om Svenska institutets myndighetsinstruktioner och regleringsbrev 1998–2018. Stockholm: Elanders.

3. Andreeva, T. L. and Kern, K. E. (2017) ‘Linguistic aspect as a factor of the foreign policy of the People’s Republic of China in the 21st century’, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, (417), pp. 25–29. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/417/4

4. Anholt, S. (1998) ‘Nation-brands of the twenty-first century’, Journal of Brand Management, 5(6), pp. 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.1998.30

5. Anholt, S. (2007) ‘Competitive Identity: A new model for the brand management of nations, cities and regions’, Policy and Practice: A Development Education Review, 4, pp. 3-13.

6. Anholt, S. (2011) ‘Beyond the Nation Brand:The Role of Image and Identity in International Relations’, Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy, 2(1), pp. 6–12.

7. Antonova, N. L., Sushchenko, A. D. and Popova, N. G. (2020) ‘Soft Power of Higher Education as a Global Leadership Factor’, The Education and science journal, 22(1), pp. 31–58. (In Russian). https://doi. org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-1-31-58

8. Belukhin, N. E., Vorotnikov, V. V. and Dianina, S. Y. (2022) ‘The Total Defense Concept as the Embodiment of Sweden’s Strategic Culture’, MGIMO Review of International Relations, 15(6), pp. 135–165. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-6-87-135-165

9. Biletska, O. (2021) ‘Culture as a Nation Branding Tool within the International Interaction System’, Culture and Arts in the Modern World, (22), pp. 22–33. https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1915.22.2021.235887

10. Boldyreva, S., Boldyrev, R. and Beloshitskaya, N. (2020) ‘Federal University’s Role in the Implementation of the Russian Federation “Soft Power” Conception in Central Asia (The Case of Northern (Arctic) Federal University Named After M.V. Lomonosov)’, Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, (2), pp. 223–232. https://doi.org/10.15688/ jvolsu4.2020.2.16

11. Butakova, A. A. and Portnyagina, M. D. (2020) ‘The phenomenon of “northern identity” and its impact on modern international relations’, Saint-Petersburg and Northern European countries, (22), pp. 318–327. (In Russian).

12. Dahl, A.-S. (2006) ‘Sweden: Once a Moral Superpower, Always a Moral Superpower?’, International Journal, 61(4), pp. 895–908. https://doi.org/10.2307/40204222

13. Dinnie, K. (2022) Nation Branding: Concepts, Issues, Practice. London: Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781003100249

14. Fan, Y. (2010) ‘Branding the nation: Towards a better understanding’, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 6(2), pp. 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2010.16

15. Glover, N. (2012) National Relations : Public Diplomacy, National Identity and the Swedish Institute 19451970. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.

16. Govorova, N. V., Zhuravel, V. P. and Samylovskaya, E. A. (2018) ‘Rossiyskaya Arktika: problemy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva [Russian Arctic: international cooperation issues]’, Contemporary Europe, (1), pp. 156–159.

17. Ham, P. van (2001) ‘The Rise of the Brand State: The Postmodern Politics of Image and Reputation’,

18. Foreign Affairs, 80(5), pp. 2–6. https://doi.org/10.2307/20050245

19. Koroleva, A. A. (2024) Naslediye i identichnost’ territorii: brikolazh ispanskikh kul’turnykh landshaftov [Heritage and territorial identity: a bricolage of Spanish cultural landscapes]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet Publ. (In Russian).

20. Kotler, P. et al. (1999) Marketing Places Europe: How to Attract Investments, Industries, Residents and Visitors to Cities, Communities, Regions, and Nations in Europe. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall. (Russ. ed.: (2005) Marketing mest. Privlecheniye investitsiy, predpriyatiy, zhiteley i turistov v goroda, kommuny, regiony i strany Yevropy. Saint Petersburg: Stokgol’mskaya shkola ekonomiki v Sankt-Peterburge Publ.).

21. Kotler, P. and Gertner, D. (2002) ‘Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective’, Journal of Brand Management, 9(4), pp. 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540076

22. Kovaleva, D. M. (2014) ‘Myagkaya sila obrazovaniya kak sredstvo ustanovleniya kulturnykh svyazey i dostizheniya politicheskikh tseley [Soft Power of Education as a Means of Establishing Cultural Ties and Achieving Political Goals]’, in Rossiya i Vostok: kulturnye svyazi v proshlom i nastoyashchem [Russia and the East: cultural connections in the past and present]. Ekaterinburg: ANO VPO Gumanitarnyy universitet Publ, pp. 33–36. (In Russian).

23. Kuznetsov, S. V., Mezhevich, N. M. and Bolotov, D. A. (2016) ‘Prigranichnoe sotrudnichestvo na Severozapade Rossii: teoriya, rossijskaya praktika v novyh geopoliticheskih usloviyah [Cross-border cooperation in the north-west of Russia: theory, Russian practical implementation in new geopolitical conditions]’, in Perspektivy socialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya prigranichnykh regionov [Border regions socio-economic development perspectives]. Petrozavodsk: Karel’skiy nauchnyy tsentr RAN Publ., pp. 54–57.

24. Larsen, H. (2021) ‘The Arctic Exception: The Role of the EU in the Kingdom of Denmark’s Arctic Policy’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 26(2), pp. 289–308. https://doi.org/10.54648/EERR2021020

25. Leonova, O. G. (2013) ‘Soft power is a resource of the state’s foreign policy’, Observer, (4), pp. 27–40. (In Russian).

26. Lundén, T. (2022) ‘Turning towards the inland sea? Swedish ’soft diplomacy‘ towards the Baltic Soviet republics before independence’, Scandinavian Journal of History, 47(3), pp. 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1080 /03468755.2021.1896576

27. Marklund, C. (2009) ‘The Social Laboratory, the Middle Way and the Swedish Model: three frames for the image of Sweden’, Scandinavian Journal of History, 34(3), pp. 264–285. https://doi. org/10.1080/03468750903134715

28. Marklund, C. (2017) ‘The Nordic Model on the Global Market of Ideas: The Welfare State as Scandinavia’s Best Brand’, Geopolitics, 22(3), pp. 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1251906

29. Marklund, C. (2021) ‘The Utopian Trap. Between Contested Swedish Models and Benign Nordic Branding’, in The Making and Circulation of Nordic Models, Ideas and Images. London: Routledge, pp. 62–82. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003156925

30. Nye, J. S. (1990) ‘Soft Power’, Foreign Policy, (80), pp. 153–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1148580

31. Olins, W. (2005) ‘Making a National Brand’, in The New Public Diplomacy. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_9

32. Parshin, P. B. (2020) Myagkaya sila v labirinte diskussiy [Soft power in a maze of debate]. Moscow: MGIMO University. (In Russian).

33. Podoplekin, A. O. et al. (2014) ‘International Arctic Science Committee: Arctic Research Priorities’, The Arctic Herald, (4), pp. 18–28.

34. Ragozin, G. S. (2023) ‘The Swedish institute’s scholarship policy as a soft power instrument’, Baltic Region, 15(3), pp. 66–82. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2023-3-4

35. Rugh, W. (2017) ‘American soft power and public diplomacy in the Arab world’, Palgrave Communications, 3(1), p. 16104. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.104

36. Ryzhkova, I. V. and Sergeev, A. M. (2019) ‘Internationalization of the Flagship University: Arctic Vector’, Higher Education in Russia, 28(3), pp. 127–136. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-3127-136

37. Silanteva, M. (2019) ‘Identity as a Communicative Project: “New Mythologies” in Modern Culture Space’, Scientific Research and Development. Modern Communication Studies, 8(1), pp. 19–25. (In Russian). https:// doi.org/10.12737/article_5c5a88d8040dd6.09767248

38. Smirnov, A. I. and Kokhtyulina, I. N. (2012) Globalnaya bezopasnost i «myagkaya sila 2.0»: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii [Global Security and Soft Power 2.0: challenges and opportunities for Russia]. Moscow: VNII Geosistem Publ. (In Russian).

39. Torkunov, A. V. (2012) ‘Education as a Soft Power Tool in Russian Foreign Policy’, MGIMO Review of International Relations, (4), pp. 85–93. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2012-4-25-85-93

40. Tsygankov, A. (2013) ‘Vsesilno, ibo verno? [Is it almighty since it is right?]’, Russia in Global Affairs, 11(6), pp. 26–36. (In Russian).

41. Zhuravel, V. (2021) ‘Тhe Russian Federation’s Chairmanship at the Arctic Council’, Contemporary Europe, 105(5), pp. 90–99. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope520219099

42. Zhuravlev, P. S. et al. (2015) Arktika v sisteme mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva i sopernichestva [Arctic in international cooperation and rivalry systems]. Arkhangelsk: Solti Publ. (In Russian).