Identity Conflict in Modern Greece: Revisiting the Concept of Helleno-Christian Synthesis?

The relevance of addressing the topic of national identity is determined by the high dynamism of changes in the societal space of the modern world, which complicates and at the same time requires constant study of the peculiarities of self-identification of certain social communities. From this point of view, the identity conflict in modern Greece provides extensive material that, despite the breadth and depth of the available research literature, has not yet been thoroughly analysed. The purpose of this study is to examine the dynamics of change in the religious component of Greek identity influenced by the processes of European integration and to explore how so-called European values are adapted to at the national level. To this end, the following objectives are achieved: firstly, the main value-based and religious attitudes of the Greek society in the process of national identity formation are identified; secondly, the available data on the current religious situation in the country are systematized; finally, the cases of identity conflict in modern Greece are analysed. The research materials include legal documents, data from official websites, as well as media materials. The research methodology relies upon axiological and hermeneutical approaches; the method of narrative analysis and discourse analysis are also used. The results of the study show that Helleno-Christian formula is an attempt to bring together Greek identity with its antique background and the Church claims to have a significant role in the process. The historic overview as well as modern statistics and data indicate patterns in the identification of the people of Greece, including cases of identity conflicts. The research substantiates the conclusion about the significant impact of the erosion of the religious component on the process of transformation of Greek identity. European legislation, as well as the ‘European values’ promoted by Brussels, have led to the deterioration of the key formula of the ‘Helleno-Christian synthesis’, which defined the design of Greek identity during the time of gaining independence and has retained its influence until recently. While, on the one hand, there is an expansion of rights and freedoms, including religious freedoms, on the other hand, a model of society imposed from above and often not supported from below, which was not typical for Greece before its accession to the EU, is being established. The identity conflict associated with this process polarises society and leads not only political parties but also religious institutions to revise their value-based and ideological platforms.

1. Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined communities : reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London; New York: Verso. (Russ. ed.: (2001) Voobrazaemye soobscestva : razmyslenija ob istokach i rasprostranenii nacionalizma. Moscow: KANON-Press-C Publ.).

2. Habermas, J. (1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.

3. Habermas, J. and Tyagunova, T. (2008) ‘Otnosheniya k miru i ratzionalnyye aspekty deystviya v chetyryokh sotziologicheskikh ponyatiyakh deystviya [Relations to the World and Rational Aspects of Action in Four Sociological Concepts of Action]’, Sociologičeskoe obozrenie, (1), pp. 3–24. (In Russian).

4. Hall, J. M. (2007) A History of the Archaic Greek World: Ca. 1200-479 BCE. Malden: Wiley.

5. Hendek, A. (2022) ‘European Religious Education Policy’, Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 20(43), pp. 243–267. https://doi.org/10.34234/ded.1102688

6. Lezina, E. P. and Ashutova, N. Y. (2018) ‘Political and Legal Teaching of Sophists’, Sociopolitical sciences, (5), pp. 139–142. (In Russian).

7. Markoviti, M. (2017) ‘The “filtering effects” of ECtHR case law on religious freedoms: legal recognition and places of worship for religious minorities in Greece’, Religion, State and Society, 45(3–4), pp. 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2017.1390871

8. Molokotos-Liederman, L. (2003) ‘Identity crisis: Greece, orthodoxy, and the European Union’, Journal of Contemporary Religion, 18(3), pp. 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537900310001601677

9. Nikitina, T. (2022) ‘Modernization and Nationalism in Greece. 1910–1932’, in The Balkans Familiar and Unfamiliar: Events, Persons, Narratives. 18th–21st Centuries. Moscow: Institute of Slavic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, pp. 418–435. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31168/7576-0477-0.4.3

10. Nikitina, T. and Petrunina, O. (2014) ‘Ethnoconfessional factor in the political life of Greece during the World War II (1940–1944) and the civil war (1946–1949): statement of the problem’, History Studies, (1), pp. 184–201. (In Russian).

11. Osvetimskaya, I. I. (2020) ‘State Power Legitimacy Crisis in the Era of Globalization’, Theoretical and applied law, (3), pp. 36–46. (In Russian).

12. Palabıyık, S. (2019) Turkish and Greek Relations in an Age of Turmoil (1821-1922): From Coexistence to Conflict. Ankara: Bilgi Publishing.

13. Petrunina, O. E. (2007) ‘Pravoslavie i neoyazychestvo v sovremennoy Gretzii [Orthodox Christianity and Neopaganism in Modern Greece]’, Religii mira: istoriya i sovremennost, 2005, pp. 293–298. (In Russian).

14. Petrunina, O. E. (2020) ‘Greek concepts of their own state at the end of the 18th – first third of the 19th century’, in Slavs and Russia: Problems of Statehood in the Balkans (late XVIII – XXI centuries). Moscow: Institute of Slavic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., pp. 35–44. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31168/2618-8570.2020.03

15. Runciman, S. (1965) The Fall of Constantinople: 1453. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Russ. ed.: (1983) Padenie Konstantinopolya v 1453 godu. Moscow: Nauka Publ.).

16. Semenenko, I. S. (2023) ‘Identichnost’ kak resurs obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Identity as a resource for social development]’, in Identichnost’: lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika. Novyye kontury issledovatel’skogo polya [Identity: personality, society, politics. New contours of the research field]. Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ., pp. 18–26. (In Russian).

17. Tsoukalas, C. (1999) ‘European modernity and Greek national identity’, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 1(1), pp. 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613199908413983

18. Zaytsev, A. V (2012) ‘Jürgen Habermas and His Dialogics: Notion and Essence’, Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 18(5), pp. 190–196. (In Russian)