Visual Images of Paul Virilio, Marshall McLuhan and Jean-Luc Nancy as a Subversive Mechanism in the Structure of the Modern World

The article offers an analysis of the philosophical and cultural ideas of Paul Virilio, Marshall McLuhan and Jean-Luc Nancy in relation to visual images, the accelerated rotation of which affects the perception of value systems and space. Since consciousness and thought arise in duration, under the pressure of speed, reflection is forced to give way to reflex, and in fact, to visual images as less demanding by nature to the procedures of assessment and interpretation. This makes us look at visual cultural studies as something that allows us to actualize the inevitable transformations in thinking and communication. The need for research is justified by the degree of influence of the visual with its system of symbols and signs on the social construction of ideas today. Thus, depending on the content, images can act both for the benefit of creative forces and from the position of destructive forces through images of violence, aestheticization of the disgusting and the transformation of the figure of the repulsive into the attractive. Just as the glance at the flesh, the cut and the wound on the pages of the first anatomical atlases responding to the demand of medical practice changed the perception of the pathological state of the body, the impression industry, operating inseparably from the constant image stimulation, blurs the line between the norm and deviation and leads to pathologies of thinking in terms of value systems, speed of information processing and distortion of the communication channel. The purpose of the study is to analyze visual images as tools to seduce the viewer, simplifying access to the control over their beliefs, desires and needs and, as a result, leading to the transformation of  world perceptions. In addition, the mechanisms by which visual images influence the viewer’s imagination are analyzed. The objectives of the research include the analysis of the mechanisms of visual images’ influence on the viewer’s imagination, in terms of the pressure they exert on the social fabric; an analysis of Paul Virilio's ideas regarding the dissemination of technological images and how they work in the context of architectural objects in the urban environment; identification of key positions of Marshall McLuhan linking the problem of high visual intensity with technical means of information transportation; updating Jean-Luc Nancy's thoughts on the visual image based on Nancy's approach to the symbol of the cut as a broken intimacy that betrays the state of modern society, and the ecstasy of openness that makes society overly hospitable to everything new and, accordingly, extremely vulnerable. Scientific novelty is determined by the author's interpretation of the area of convergence and intersection of time, space, technology and how they manifest themselves in images that affect almost all aspects of human experience. An important part is devoted to the relationship of the concepts of Paul Virilio, Marshall McLuhan and Jean-Luc Nancy with the dramatic events of their lives that ultimately influenced the conclusions they came to. The study also includes essays, articles and interviews, which were not previously featured in reviews, in addition to, a dedication to Virilio from John Armitage and Ryan Bishop, a dedication to McLuhan from Janine Marchessault and one of Nancy's conversations with Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe. The methods of selection, systematization and cultural interpretation of the analyzed sources were used. Additionally, the biographical method was applied to establish a connection between the authors and the concepts addressed in this study. The similarities and differences of the ideas discussed were compared in the vein of a comparative approach, and the procedure for interpreting texts was based on a hermeneutic approach. As a result, it was possible to systematize the key positions of Paul Virilio, Marshall McLuhan and Jean-Luc Nancy on the evaluation and forecast for the functioning of visual images in culture. All three authors consider visual images as new and anti-proportionateto-human. Thus the axiological framework of viewing them as a cultural threat arises. Virilio stresses the antihierarchical nature of the new images, while McLuhan and Nancy emphasize their speed of dissemination and aggressiveness, respectively. 

1. Agrba, A. A. (2023) ‘The Experience Economy in the Prism of Cultural and Value Paradigms’, Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, 7(4), pp. 98–116. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2023-4-2898-116

2. Annelies, A. (2021) ‘“Our Ears Lived Their Own Lives”. The Auditory Experience in Breslau Autobiographical Literature during the Third Reich’, KANT Social Sciences & Humanities, (5), pp. 5–23. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.24923/2305-8757.2021-5.1

3. Arkhangelskaya, I. B. (2010) Marshall McLuhan. Nizhnij Novgorod: Nizhegorodskiy kommercheskiy institut Publ. (In Russian)

4. Armitage, J. and Bishop, R. (2013) ‘Aesthetics, Vision and Speed: An Introduction’, in Virilio and Visual Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1–27.

5. Arnould, E. J. and Thompson, C. J. (2005) ‘Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research’, Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), pp. 868–882. https://doi.org/10.1086/426626

6. Blair, A. M. (2010) Too much to know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

7. Bykov, D. V (2017) ‘The CNN Effect and Its Influence on the Development of the Global Media Space’, Kulʹtura i obrazovanie, (1), pp. 22–28. (In Russian)

8. Ivenkova, O. A. and Itunina, N. B. (2022) ‘G.M. McLuhan: Communication as a Means Socialization’, Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem, 14(4), pp. 478–492. (In Russian) https://doi. org/10.12731/2077-1770-2022-14-4-478-492

9. Konovalov, G. (2017) ‘Corpus vs Object: Jean-Luc Nancy’s Ontology of Bodies as Object-Oriented’, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos, 27(3), pp. 113–124. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-53772017-3-113-124

10. Marchessault, J. (2005) Marshall McLuhan: Cosmic Media. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi. org/10.4135/9781446217276

11. McLuhan, M. (1959) ‘Myth and Mass Media’, Daedalus, 88(2), pp. 339–348.

12. McLuhan, M. (1962) The Gutenberg galaxy : the making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Russ.ed.: (2004) Galaktika Gutenberga stanovlenie cheloveka pechataiushchego. Kyiv: NikaCenter Elga Publ.).

13. McLuhan, M. (1964) Understanding Media: External extensions of man. London: Routledge & K. Paul. (Russ.ed.: (2003) Ponimaniye Media: Vneshniye rasshireniya cheloveka. Moscow; Zhukovsky: KANON-pressTS Publ., Kuchkovo pole Publ.).

14. Metz, B. (2008) ‘Bibliomania and the Folly of Reading’, Comparative Critical Studies, 5(2–3), pp. 249–269. https://doi.org/10.3366/E174418540800044X

15. Nancy, J.-L. (1993) The Birth to Presence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

16. Nancy, J.-L. (1996) Être singulier pluriel. Paris: Galilée. (Russ.ed.: (2004) Bytiye yedinichnoye mnozhestvennoye. Minsk: Logvinov Publ.).

17. Nancy, J.-L. (2005) The Ground of the Image. New York: Fordham University Press.

18. Nancy, J.-L. (2006) El Intruso. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

19. Nancy, J.-L. (2016) The Disavowed Community. New York: Fordham University Press.

20. Nazarenko, A. N. (2020) ‘Visual Image: between Media and Imaginary’, Obŝestvo, sreda, razvitie, (1), pp. 43–46. (In Russian)

21. Nikolaeva, A. B. (2022) ‘The Scientist’s Persona through his Concepts: the Fake Reality of Peacetime in the Philosophical Investigations of Paul Virilio’, Review of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian research, (3), pp. 36–40. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.36809/2309-9380-2022-36-36-40

22. Petrovskaya, E. V. (2001) ‘Vtorzheniye i gostepriimstvo (ZH.-L. Nansi i ZH. Derrida) [Invasion and Hospitality (J.-L. Nancy and J. Derrida)]’, Russian journal of philosophical sciences, (3), pp. 108–115. (In Russian)

23. Prokhorov, E. A. (2021) ‘The Concept of “Community” in the Social Ontology of J.-L.Nancy and J. Agamben’, Humanitarian Vector, 16(2), pp. 8–15. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2021-162-8-15

24. Ryzhenkova, V. V. (2020) ‘Testimonies of the Future: The Digital-Turn in the Philosophy of Media and Hybrid Arts’, Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art, (10), pp. 641–648. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.18688/aa200-4-59

25. Sarthou-Lajus, N. (2009) ‘L’ère de la vitesse et des grandes migrations’, Études, 410(2), pp. 199–207. https://doi.org/10.3917/etu.102.0199

26. Sergeeva, N. ., Pashova, E. V. and Borodina, M. A. (2024) ‘Visual turn in culture and its reflection in contemporary art’, Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and social sciences, 17(1), pp. 84–100. (In Russian)

27. Sharopova, N. R. (2019) ‘On the border: the difference between depth and surface in the study of images’, Philosophy Journal, 12(3), pp. 76–94. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2019-12-376-94

28. Simakova, S. (2020) ‘“Civilization of the Eye”: the Specifics of the Visual Representation of the Event’, Humanitarian Vector, 15(1), pp. 125–133. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-1-125133

29. Stepanov, M. A. (2009) ‘Mashiny abstraktsiy i konets protezirovaniya [Abstraction machines and the end of prosthetics]’, Mediafilosofiâ, 2, pp. 123-137. (In Russian)

30. Virilio, P. (1988) ‘La lumière indirecte’, Communications, 48(1), pp. 45–52. https://doi.org/10.3406/ comm.1988.1719

31. Virilio, P. (1993) ‘Le privilège de l’œil’, Quaderni, 21(1), pp. 75–88. https://doi.org/10.3406/ quad.1993.1040

32. Virillo, P. (1984) L’horizon négatif. Essai de dromoscopie. Paris: Éditions Galilée.

33. Virillo, P. (1988) La machine de vision. Paris: Galilée. (Russ.ed.: (2004) Mashina zreniya. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ.).

34. Yusipov, E. A. (2021) ‘Marshall McLuhan on society and its history: More than half a century later’, Humanities Bulletin of BMSTU, (1), p. 6. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.18698/2306-8477-2021-1-706

35. Zabaev, I. V. (2002) ‘Luke, T., O tuathail, G. Thinking Geopolitical Space. The Spatiality of War, Speed and Vision in the Work of Paul Virilio’, Sociological review, 2(3), pp. 47–53. (In Russian)

36. Zhaparova, A. K. (2022) ‘Metaphors of the Body in the Philosophy of Jean-Luc Nancy: the Suffering Body’, Review of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian research, (37), pp. 24–28. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.36809/2309-9380-2022-37-24-28

37. Zurabova, L. R. (2018) ‘The Transformation of Social and Communicative Practices in M. McLuhan’’s “Global Village”’, MCU journal of philosophical sciences, (3), pp. 106–112. (In Russian)