Indexing or Insinuation: Ranking States as a Manipulation Tool for Political and (Post)Cultural Influence
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2024-3-31-97-110
Abstract
The article critically examines the criteria, norms and procedures of indexing that have become popular in recent years and are being increasingly implemented in all spheres of life. The research focuses on the assessment of criteria for determining the capacity of states based on quantitative data processing. It is argued that indexing often implies tools for influence which lead to deepening inequality, unhealthy competition and disagreements between countries. According to the author's hypothesis, the hidden purpose of such classifications is stigmatization and favoritism, the desire to exert political influence, deliberately underestimating the status of some states and elevating others. On the one hand ranking is used to emphasize the inequality of countries, to define friends and foes, or inner and outer circles, and on the other hand — to reduce everything to the same criteria, standards, without proper analysis and understanding of the context, historical background, national, cultural, religious characteristics. The materials for the study were documents submitted by various organizations, including non-governmental organizations, as well as analytical and research works devoted to the analysis of the ranking phenomenon. The purpose of the study is to analyze the tools for manipulation carried out through the assessment of the capacity of states. The research tasks include: critical understanding of ranking mechanisms, disclosure of the manipulative potential of game strategies with indexing, as well as the analysis of individual cases indicating the dubiousness of the procedure for evaluating the capacity of states based on the analysis of statistical data, without taking into account the entire complex of components that determine state effectiveness. The study shows that under the guise of indexing, manipulative practices and soft influence on the states political regimes are used, thus entire regions become the object of evaluative and subjective judgments of the so-called experts.
About the Author
L. A. Agrba
Abkhazian State University
Abkhazia
Abkhazia
Lana A. Agrba — PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Roman and German Languages, 1, Universitetskaya St., Sukhum, Abkhazia, 384900
References
1. Alekseeva, I. Y. (2019) ‘Indeks schast’ya i konets istorii [The Happiness Index and the End of History]’, Philosophy and society, (4), pp. 56–64. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30884/jfio/2019.04.03
2. Anderson, C. and Kilduff, G. J. (2009) ‘The Pursuit of Status in Social Groups’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), pp. 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01655.x
3. Bartolini, S. (2005) Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring between the Nation State and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Oxford scholarship online). https://doi.org/10.1093/0199286434.001.0001
4. Beaumont, P. and Towns, A. E. (2021) ‘The Rankings Game: A Relational Approach to Country Performance Indicators’, International Studies Review, 23(4), pp. 1467–1494. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/ viab017
5. Belousova, I. A. (2015) ‘The Problems and Prospects of Rating Assessment of Political Stability’, Bulletin of Russian Peoples’ Friendship University. Series Political Sciences, (3), pp. 35–46. (In Russian).
6. Kelley, C. et al. (2017) ‘Power and Status: The Building Blocks of Effective Leadership’, Journal of
7. Character and Leadership Development, 4(1 SE-Articles). https://jcldusafa.org/index.php/jcld/article/view/179
8. Cooley, A. and Snyder, J. (2015) ‘Rank Has Its Privileges’, Foreign Affairs, (94), p. 101.
9. Cooley, A. and Snyder, J. (eds) (2015) Ranking the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316161555
10. Gligich-Zolotareva, M. V. (2015) ‘Mezhdunarodnyye reytingi kak instrumenty global’nogo vliyaniya [International ratings as instruments of global influence]’, in Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya [Russia: trends and development prospects]. Moscow: INION RAN Publ., pp. 246–249. (In Russian).
11. Gorelskiy, I. E. and Mironyuk, M. . (2019) ‘Climbing the status ladder: an experiment in empirical research of relation between status of a state in the system of international relations and state capacity’, Political science, (3), pp. 140–174. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.03.06
12. Ilyin, M. V. et al. (2007) ‘Struktura i Logika postroyeniya indeksov v proyekte “Politicheskiy atlas sovremennosti” [The Structure and Logic of Index Construction in the Project “Political Atlas of Modernity”]’, Political science, (3), pp. 118–150. (In Russian).
13. Ivanov, V. G. and Ivanova, M. G. (2015) ‘“Charts Power” — International Ratings as an Economic Weapon and a Tool of Soft Power. Part 1’, Bulletin of Russian Peoples’ Friendship University. Series Political Sciences, (2), pp. 36–51. (In Russian).
14. Kelley, J. G. (2017) Scorecard Diplomacy: Grading States to Influence their Reputation and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108186100
15. Melvil, A. Y. et al. (2006) ‘Essay of Countries Classification’, Polis. Political Studies, (5), pp. 39–57. (In Russian).
16. Milliken, J. and Krause, K. (2002) ‘State Failure, State Collapse, and State Reconstruction: Concepts, Lessons and Strategies’, Development and Change, 33(5), pp. 753–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660. t01-1-00247
17. Mironyuk, M. G., Timofeyev, V. V. and Vaslavskiy, Y. I. (2006) ‘Universal comparisons, with quantitative methods of analysis applied (a review of precedents)’, Polis. Political Studies, (5), pp. 39–57. (In Russian).
18. Ponomareva, E. and Zarytov, P. (2018) ‘The Modern Ukraine: The Evaluation of State Capability (1991–2016)’, Discourse-P, 32–33(3–4), pp. 57–71 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17506/dipi.2018.32.3.5771
19. Rakhmankulova, N. F. (2021) ‘Mozhno li izmerit’ schast’ye? [Can happiness be measured?]’, Philosophy and society, (2), pp. 91–106. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30884/jfio/2021.02.06
20. Rothstein, B. (2012) ‘Good Governance’, in Levi-Faur, D. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.013.0010
21. Schueth, S. (2011) ‘Assembling International Competitiveness: The Republic of Georgia, USAID, and the Doing Business Project’, Economic Geography, 87(1), pp. 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.19448287.2010.01103.x
22. Shevsky, D. (2020) ‘What Is State Failure?’, International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 18(3), pp. 67–85. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2020.18.3.62.7
23. Smith, P. K. and Magee, J. C. (2015) ‘The interpersonal nature of power and status’, Current Opinion in
24. Behavioral Sciences, 3, pp. 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.007
25. Sohn, Y. (2019) ‘South Korea under the United States–China rivalry: dynamics of the economic-security nexus in trade policymaking’, The Pacific Review, 32(6), pp. 1019–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.20 19.1617770
26. Tilly, C. (1975) The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27. Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Review
For citations:
Agrba L.A. Indexing or Insinuation: Ranking States as a Manipulation Tool for Political and (Post)Cultural Influence. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2024;8(3):97-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2024-3-31-97-110
Views:
231
Email this article 