EU in Search of Identity: Theoretical and Philosophical Aspects of Strategic Autonomy

The process of modern world order construction is still ongoing. It is accompanied by various transformations, which, among other things, affect the normative and value orientations of the world political actors and push them to reflect both on their place in the new world order and, ultimately, on their identities. Studying these identities contributes to a deeper understanding of the logic of their behavior in domestic and foreign policy. At a time when, on the one hand, the European Union is striving for greater actorness and independence in its actions in the international arena and, on the other hand, crisis tendencies in European integration and the reduction of the EU’s normative force are quite palpable, the problem of the European Union's identity is becoming increasingly relevant. This article puts to test the hypothesis that the European Union uses the concept of strategic autonomy as a tool for (re)constructing its identity. The theoretical and philosophical foundations of this concept are examined through the constructivist paradigm using the materials of theoretical works, organizational documents and practices on the subject. The study proceeds from a broad understanding of strategic autonomy as the ability and possibility of the European Union to pursue an autonomous policy in strategically important areas and on a wide range of issues, from strengthening its defense capabilities to protecting values. The authors give a brief overview of the origins, evolution and crisis of the 'European idea' as the raison d'être of European integration and the basis of the European Union's identity. The article also examines the relationship between the categories of identity and strategic autonomy. The main method of the research is discourse analysis at the level of EU’s strategic and policy documents. The results of the study have shown that the concept of strategic autonomy offers, both a predictable strategy for behavior in relations with others, and a coherent narrative regarding the EU as a global player. Thus, the authors conclude that by implementing the concept of strategic autonomy the EU can find a way out of its identity crisis.

1. Adler, E. (2002) ‘Constructivism and International Relations’, in Handbook of International Relations. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 95–118. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608290.n5

2. Anderson, B. R. O. (1991) Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

3. Andrén, M. (2022) Thinking Europe: A History of the European Idea Since 1800. New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781800735699

4. Arbatova, N. K. (2019) ‘Strategic Autonomy of the European Union: Reality or Good Intention?’, Polis.

5. Political Studies, (6), pp. 36–52. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.06.04

6. Arbatova, N. K. et al. (2020) Strategicheskaya avtonomiya ES i perspektivy sotrudnichestva s Rossiej [EU strategic autonomy and prospects for co-operation with Russia]. Moscow: Ves` mir Publ. (In Russian).

7. Austin, J. L. (1962) How to do Things with Words : the William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Cambridge: The Harvard University Press.

8. Barthes, R. (1964) ‘Éléments de sémiologie’, Communications , (4), pp. 91–135.

9. Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday. (Russ. ed.: (1995) Sotsial’noye konstruirovaniye real’nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. Moscow: Medium Publ.).

10. Blommaert, J. (2005) Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295.

11. Borko, Yu. A. (2003) Ot Evropejskoj idei k edinoj Evrope [From the European Idea to a united Europe]. Moscow: Delovaja literatura Publ. (In Russian).

12. Brubaker, R. and Cooper, F. (2000) ‘Beyond “identity”’, Theory and Society, 29(1), pp. 1–47. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1007068714468

13. Bruter, M. (2005) Citizens of Europe? The Emergence of a Mass European Identity. London: Palgrave

14. Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501539

15. Butorina, O. V. and Borko, J. A. (2022) ‘Benefits of Regional Integration: towards Redefining the Concept’, Contemporary Europe, (1), pp. 5–20. (In Russian).

16. Ceretta, M. and Curli, B. (eds) (2017) Discourses and Counter-discourses on Europe: From the Enlightenment to the EU. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315636474

17. Česnakas, G. and Juozaitis, J. (2022) European Strategic Autonomy and Small States’ Security. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003324867

18. Dainotto, R. (2007) Europe (in Theory). Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi. org/10.1215/9780822389620

19. Deutsch, K. W. (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area; International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

20. Diez, T. (2021) ‘X The End or the Beginning of Normative Power Europe? Transcendence and the Crisis of European Foreign Policy’, in Soft-Power Internationalism: Competing for Cultural Influence in the 21stCentury Global Order. New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press, pp. 251–273. https:// doi.org/10.7312/bayk19544-012 van Dijk, T. A. (1997) ‘What is Political Discourse Analysis?’, Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11, pp. 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij

21. Drynochkin, A. V. and Sergeev, E.A. (2023) ‘Glava 10. Evropejskij soyuz: novye tendencii uchastiya v processah globalizacii [Chapter 10. Europen Union: New Treands in Economic Globalization]’, in Novye trendy v ekonomicheskoj globalizacii [New Treands in Economic Globalization]. Moscow: Aspekt Press, pp. 165–192. (In Russian).

22. Fairclough, I. and Fairclough, N. (2012) Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780203137888

23. Feldman, O. and De Landtsheer, C. (1998) Politically Speaking: A Worldwide Examination of Language Used in the Public Sphere. Westport: Greenwood.

24. Finnemore, M. (1996) National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

25. Giddens, A. (1984) The constitution of society : outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

26. Haas, E. B. (1970) ‘The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of

27. Pretheorizing’, International Organization, 24(4), pp. 606–646. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300017495

28. Habermas, J. (1987) The theory of communicative action. Vol. 2 : Lifeworld and system : a critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.

29. Hansen, L. (2006) Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203236338

30. Holzscheiter, A. (2014) ‘Between Communicative Interaction and Structures of Signification: Discourse Theory and Analysis in International Relations’, International Studies Perspectives, 15(2), pp. 142–162. https:// doi.org/10.1111/insp.12005

31. Huysmans, J. (1998) ‘Security! What Do You Mean?: From Concept to Thick Signifier’, European Journal of

32. International Relations, 4(2), pp. 226–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004002004

33. Igumnova, L. O. (2011) ‘Normative Aims of the European Union Foreign Policy’, The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series History, pp. 154–169. (In Russian).

34. Kharkevich, M. V. (2010) ‘The State in Contemporary World Politics’, MGIMO Review of International Relations, (6), pp. 160–166. (In Russian).

35. Kinnvall, C. and Mitzen, J. (2020) ‘Anxiety, fear, and ontological security in world politics: thinking with and beyond Giddens’, International Theory, 12(2), pp. 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297192000010X

36. Kriuolina, I. V. (2009) ‘P-H. Spaak Activities in the Sphere of European Integration’, Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series International relations, (2), pp. 79–86. (In Russian).

37. Lebedeva, M. (2019) ‘Modern Megatrends of World Politics’, World Economy and International Relations, 63(9), pp. 29–37. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-29-37

38. Liebes, T. and Ribak, R. (1991) ‘A Mother’s Battle Against TV News: A Case Study of Political Socialization’, Discourse & Society, 2(2), pp. 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926591002002004

39. Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), pp. 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353

40. Mearsheimer, J.J. (2019) ‘Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order’, International Security, 43(4), pp. 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342

41. Melnikova, S. V. (2020) ‘Does the European Identity Really Exist? An Analysis of the European Unity Value Foundations in the Case of Its Mediatory Role in The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict’, Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, 4(3), pp. 29–42. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-29-42

42. Miró, J. (2023) ‘Responding to the global disorder: the EU’s quest for open strategic autonomy’, Global Society, 37(3), pp. 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2022.2110042

43. Mitzen, J. (2006) ‘Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma’, European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), pp. 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346.

44. Neumann, I. B. (1999) Uses of the other : ‘The East’ in European identity formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Russ. ed.: (2004) Ispol’zovaniye ‘Drugogo’: obrazy Vostoka v sosednikh yevropeyskikh identichnostyakh. Moscow: Novoye Izdatelstvo Publ.).

45. Onuf, N. (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203722428

46. Pagden, A. (ed.) (2002) The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511496813

47. Palm, T. (2021) ‘Normative Power and EU Strategic Autonomy’, in The Future of European Strategy in a Changing Geopolitical Environment: Challenges and Prospects. Hague: The Hague Center for Strategic Studies, pp. 25–27.

48. Pogorelskaya, A. (2022) ‘The EU normative power in development policy’, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg

49. University. International relations, 14(4), pp. 456–474. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2021.406

50. Ricoeur, P. (1955) Histoire et vérité. Paris: Seuil. (Russ. ed.: (2002) Istoriya i istina. Saint Petersburg: Aletheia Publ.).

51. Riddervold, M. (2010) ‘“A matter of principle”? EU foreign policy in the International Labour Organization’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17(4), pp. 581–598. https://doi. org/10.1080/13501761003673401

52. Risse, T. (2003) ‘The Euro between national and European identity’, Journal of European Public Policy, 10(4), pp. 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000101235

53. Risse, T. (2005) ‘Neofunctionalism, European identity, and the puzzles of European integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12(2), pp. 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500044033

54. Risse, T. and Engelmann-Martin, D. (2002) ‘Identity Politics and European Integration: The Case of Germany’, in The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511496813.014

55. Romanova, T. (2021) ‘The EU’s Discourse on Sovereignty: Content and Consequences’, Contemporary Europe, 105(5), pp. 32–44. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope520213244 Rougemont, D. de (1966) The idea of Europe. New York: Macmillan.

56. Ryon, E. (2020) ‘European strategic autonomy: Energy at the heart of European security?’, European View, 19(2), pp. 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685820968302

57. Sartre, J.-P. (1976) L’être et le néant; essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Paris: Gallimard.

58. Semenenko I.S. (2008) ‘Metamorphoses of European Identity’, Polis. Political Studies, (3), pp. 80–96. (In Russian).

59. Sergeev, E. A. and Vorotnikov, V. V. (2023) Strategiya Evropejskogo Soyuza v usloviyah global’noj perestrojki: avtonomiya ili evtanaziya? [Strategy of the EU under the global perestroika: autonomy or euthanasia?]. Moscow: MGIMO University Publ. (In Russian).

60. Shore, C. and Black, A. (2021) ‘Citizens’ Europe and the Construction of European Identity’, in The Anthropology of Europe: Identities and Boundaries in Conflict. London: Routledge, pp. 275–298. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781003135197-13

61. Sidorova, E. and Sidorov, A. (2023) ‘EU Strategic Autonomy in the Economy’, International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 21(3), pp. 119–142. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2023.21.3.74.7

62. Waever, O. et al. (1993) Identity, migration, and the new security agenda in Europe. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

63. Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183

64. Wilson, J. (2015) ‘Political Discourse’, in The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 775–794. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch36