Spiritual Service, Sacred Toponymics and Heroic Ancestor as Forms of the Description of Russian Islam before the Nation-building Period

The article focuses on the creation of the image of the Muslim community of inner Russia in the historical writings of the pre-revolutionary Tatar-Bashkir elite. The relevance of the study stems from the need to clarify the origin of their present-day national and religious identity. The study materials include established biographical collections, focusing primarily on the biographies of imams and the history of mosques. The authors of the discussed printed works (Sh. Marjani, R. Fahretdin and Muhammad Murad-Ramzi) represent a modernizing society of the middle of the 19th – early 20th centuries, when the framework of the community was made of official institutions. The aim of the research is to trace key ideas representing the worldview as reflected in the studied collections. To this end, the study addresses the following objectives:1) to trace the process of forming the internal image of Russian Muslims; 2) to analyze the interpretation of the conception of ideal spaces through the prism of social constructivism and religious anthropology; 3) to identify specific characteristics of self-representation, writing style and cultural background of the collections. Apart from the historic-genetic, axiological and hermeneutic methods, an anthropological approach to social constructivism theories and ideas of imaginary communities were applied. As a result, it was shown that the collection tends to be centered around the personality of the compiler and his religious and ideological perspective. It is noted that religious ideas and social practices of the community strongly correlate with the development of the unique identity of the Tatar-Muslim community. An incomplete listing of the collection only favors the compilers’ inclination to express their personal likes and dislikes. Unlike modern encyclopedias, the studied collections are somewhat sketchy and do not represent a comprehensive worldview. However, they serve the universal idea of the search for unity by intellectuals and religious leaders of the time. The research fills an important gap in the transformation of the Muslim diaspora in Russia into a secular nation. As a result, the basic principles of the feeling of the collective in the pre-national period were identified. The author concludes that 1) the internal image of Tatar Muslims in Russia was formed both historically and under the influence of Tatar Muslim intellectual elites; 2) social constructivism methodology made it possible to trace the shift from Bulgar as a sacred center to authoritative genealogies of imams which complete the self-representation image of the community; 3) by the beginning of the 20th century, the community center moved from Kazan to the border of Tatars and Bashkirs tribes, the Muftiate in Ufa became a platform for the consolidation of the Turkic-Muslim nationalities of Russia and representation of their religious authority and formal status.

1. Derks, L. (1995) ‘Exploring the Social Panorama’, NLP World, 2(3), pp. 28–42.

2. Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge & K. Paul. (Russ. ed.: (2000) Chistota i opasnost`: Analiz predstavlenij ob oskvernenii i tabu. Moscow: KanonPress-Cz: Kuchkovo pole Publ.).

3. Erokhina, E. (2021) ‘Imaginary and Rational: From Social Theory to Social Order’, Ideas and Ideals,

4. (4–1), pp. 168–179. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2021-13.4.1-168-179

5. Featherstone, M. and Turner, B. S. (2022) ‘Mary Douglas on Purity and Danger: An Interview’, Theory,

6. Culture & Society, 39(7–8), pp. 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221141821

7. Frank, A. (1998) Islamic Historiography and ‘Bulghar’ Identity Among the Tatars and Bashkirs of Russia. Leiden: BRILL.: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004492714 (Russ. ed.: (2008) Islamskaya istoriografiya i «bulgarskaya» identichnost’ tatar i bashkir v Rossii. Kazan: RIU.).

8. Gorenburg, D. (2005) ‘Tatars as Meso-Nation’, in Emerging Meso-Areas in the Former Socialist Countries: Histories Revived or Improvised? Sapporo: Hokkaido University, pp. 83–92.

9. Guseva, Y. N., Senyutkina, O.N. and Khristoforov, V.S. (2021) Pytayas’ ponyat’ i voobrazit’ islam (obraz islama v soznanii rossijskih elit 1880-h – 1920-h gg.) [Trying to understand and imagine Islam (the image of Islam in the minds of the Russian elites of the 1880s and 1920s)]. Moscow: Medina Publ. (In Russian).

10. Hroch, M. (1996) ‘From National Movement to the Fully-formed Nation: The Nation-building Process in Europe’, in Mapping the Nation. London, New York: Verso, pp. 78–97. (Russ. ed.: (2002) ‘Ot nacional’nyh dvizhenij k polnost’ju sformirovavshejsja nacii: process stroitel’stva nacij v Evrope ’, in Nacii i nacionalizm. Moscow: Praxema Publ., pp. 121–145.).

11. Khalid, A. (2002) ‘Islamization and Native Religion in the Golden Horde: Baba Tukles and Conversion to Islam in Historical and Epic Tradition, and: Islamic Historiography and “Bulghar” Identity among the Tatars and Bashkirs of Russia, and: L’Islam de Russie: Conscience communautaire et autonomie politique chez les Tatars de la Volga et de l’Oural depuis le XVIIIe siecle. Actes du colloque international a Qazan, 29 avril-1 juin 1996 (review)’, Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 3(4), pp. 728–738. https://doi. org/10.1353/kri.2002.0054

12. von Kügelgen, A. (2000) ‘Islamic Historiography and “Bulghar” Identity among the Tatars and Bashkirs of Russia’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 120(1), pp. 115–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/604903

13. Lazzerini, E. J. (1986) ‘The Revival of Islamic Culture in pre-Revolutionary Russia: or, Why a

14. Prosopography of the Tatar Ulema?’, in Passé Turco-Tatar, Présent Soviétique: etudes offertes à Alexandre Bennigsen. Paris: Editions Peeters, pp. 367–372.

15. Lottholz, P. (2022) Post-Liberal Statebuilding in Central Asia. Bristol: Bristol University Press. https://doi. org/10.56687/9781529220025

16. Oklopcic, Z. (2018) Beyond the People: Social Imaginary and Constituent Imagination. Oxford: Oxford

17. University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198799092.001.0001

18. Rahman, R. (2021) ‘The Dissemination and Implementation of Islam within the African American Community’, American Journal of Islam and Society, 38(1–2), pp. 136–168. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis. v38i1-2.752

19. Redkozubov, A. D. (2015) ‘Islam in the Russian Empire’, Humanity space, 4(5), pp. 987–993. (In Russian).

20. Sánchez-Castañeda, P. A. (2020) ‘Memory in Sacred Places: The Revitalization Process of the Muisca

21. Community’, Urban Planning, 5(3), pp. 263–273. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i3.3109

22. Spannaus, N. (2011) ‘Rrizaéddin Fäxreddin and the Social History of the Muslim Communities of the Russian Empire’, Ab Imperio, 2011(4), pp. 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2011.0006

23. Tuna, M. (2015) Imperial Russia’s Muslims: Islam, Empire and European Modernity, 1788–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139506366

24. Validi, A. Z. (2001) ‘Rus tarihy ädäbiâtynda Märğani [Marjani in Russian historical literature]’, in Märğani. Mäkalälär ğyentygy (Šihabetdin häzrätläreneñ vilâdatyna jöz el tulu (1233-1333) mönäsäbäte ilä näšer itelde): v 2 t. T. 1 [Marjani. Collection of articles (published in connection with the centenary of the vilayat of

25. Shihabeddin hazrats (1233–1333): in 2 vols. Vol. 1]. Kazan: Iman Publ., pp. 30–43. (In Tatar)

26. Varvarousis, A. (2019) ‘Crisis, liminality and the decolonization of the social imaginary’, Environment and

27. Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(3), pp. 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619841809

28. Zaloom, C. (2020) ‘Mary Douglas, Purity and Danger (1966)’, Public Culture, 32(2), pp. 415–422. https:// doi.org/10.1215/08992363-8090159