Application of Scenario Modeling Method for Virtual Reconstruction of Lost Monuments Using the Example of Sigirya

Virtual reconstruction of lost monuments of the past is an interdisciplinary field of research that combines history and architecture with computer modeling and information technology. Its relevance is due not only to the needs of academic science in the study of cultural heritage, but also to the practical tasks of developing the field of education and tourism. Sigiriya, a 5th-century palace complex that has become an important tourist attraction, has survived to our time, albeit with significant losses. Despite Sigiriya's long-term research, many issues related to the goals of creating the complex and the functioning of its individual elements remain unclear and cause controversy in scientific circles. Such voluminous and multifaceted research objects as Sigiriya require a broad and 

flexible interdisciplinary approach to their study, combining various research approaches. One of these approaches is the method of scenario modeling, which allows researchers to fill in the gaps in previous studies, based on this, creating a full-fledged, detailed description of the object. This method was applied in fields such as forecasting and sociology of economics, and then also began to be used in the field of design and construction. This method was borrowed from the architect's work and is based on a deep analysis of the client's personal social requirements, goals and expectations — drawing up his mental portrait. Combined with the methods of iconographic analysis, the study of written sources and archaeological data, the scenario modeling method can be applied to the virtual reconstruction of monuments of the past. In the study of Sigiriya, the method of scenario analysis allows us to establish that the large-scale palace and park ensemble served as a cultural center, the purpose of which was to develop international relations and attract merchants to the country. The method of scenario consideration, unified with modern digital technologies, makes it possible to conduct virtual experiments with monuments without the need for a physical trial.

1. Alker, H. R. (1996) ‘Beneath Tit-for-Tat: The contest of political economy fairy tales within SPD protocols’, in Rediscoveries and Reformulations: Humanistic Methodologies for International Studies. Cambridge:

2. Cambridge University Press, pp. 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598678

3. Baxandall, М. (1985) Patterns of intention: on the historical explanation of pictures. New Haven: Yale University Press. (Russ. ed.: (2003) Uzory Intencii: Ob istoricheskom tolkovanii kartin. Moscow: UniPrint Publ.).

4. Druzhinina, O. B. (2018) ‘Instruments of design programming’, Dekorativnoe iskusstvo i predmetnoprostranstvennaâ sreda, (4–2), pp. 301–320. (In Russian).

5. Garskova, I. M. (2019) ‘The “Digital Turn” in Historical Research: Long-term Trends’, Historical informatics, (3), pp. 57–75. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.7256/2585-7797.2019.3.31251

6. Goncharova, A. L. and Kruzhilina, T. V. (2022) ‘Teoreticheskoe i prakticheskoe myshlenie v strukture proektnoj kul’tury arhitektora [Theoretical and practical thinking resulting from the architect’s design culture]’, in Aktual’nye problemy sovremennogo obshchego i professional’nogo obrazovaniya [Actual problems of modern general and professional education]. Magnitogorsk: Magnitogorskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnicheskiy universitet im. G.I. Nosova Publ., pp. 37–45. (In Russian).

7. Grinin, L. E., Korotaev, A. V. and Kradin, N. N. (2014) ‘Glava 19. Metody istoricheskogo issledovaniya [Chapter 19. Methods of historical research]’, in Teoriya i metodologiya istorii [Theory and methodology of history]. Volgograd: Uchitel`, pp. 386–408. (In Russian).

8. Lekareva, N. A. (2007) ‘Modelirovaniye kak tvorcheskiy metod v vysshem obrazovanii arkhitektora [Modeling as a creative method in higher education of an architect]’, Fundamental research, (7), pp. 97–99. (In Russian).

9. Lekareva, N. A. (2010) ‘Creativity problems in landscape design teaching’, Arhitekton. Izvestiâ vuzov, (1), pp. 37–40. (In Russian).

10. Panofsky, E. (1955) Meaning in the Visual Arts: papers in and on art history. Garden City, N.Y.:

11. Doubleday Anchor Books. (Russ. ed.: (1999) Smysl i tolkovanie izobrazitel’nogo iskusstva. Saint Petersburg: Akademicheskiy prospekt Publ.).

12. Paranavitana, S. (1972) The Story of Sigiri. Colombo: Lake House Investments.

13. Paranavitana, Senarat. (1956) Sigiri Graffiti : Being Sinhalese Verses of the Eight, Ninth and Tenth Centuries. London: Oxford University P. for the Government of Ceylon.

14. Shilov, A. A. (2020) ‘Stsenarnyy podkhod v vozdushnom prostranstve [Scenario approach to the formation of architectural space]’, in Aktual’nyye problemy nauki i tekhniki [Actual problems of science and technology]. Ufa: Vestnik nauki Publ., pp. 428–434. (In Russian).

15. Tosh, J. (1984) Pursuit of History: Aims, Methods and New Directions. London: Longman. (Russ. ed.: (2000) Stremlenie k istine : kak ovladet masterstvom istorika. Moscow: Ves` mir Publ.).