Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE RUSSIAN INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING IN EUROPE AND USA

Abstract

The article concerns the effectiveness of the Russian foreign broadcasting in Europe and the United States in 2008-2016. The author analyzes the information campaigns around the South Ossetian conflict (2008) and the Ukrainian crisis (2014-2016); in particular the activities of Russia directed to protect its own interests in the information space. The tools of this activity are Russian channels and Internet resources aimed at foreign audiences. The effectiveness of these instruments depends on compliance with the targets set in such documents as the Concept of Foreign Policy and Information Security Doctrine. To assess the effectiveness of the channels the author employs such indicators as citedness and impact on public opinion, reflected in the opinion polls and surveys. The comparative study of the two information campaigns shows that the Russian international broadcasting could fulfill the tasks set by the government just partially, in particular, to make the Russian point of view more accessible to foreign audiences. However, it failed to meet the challenge of improving the country's image on the world stage, and at the same time did not provide an objective perception of Russia's foreign policy Disadvantages of the information campaign can be explained by the fact that the Russian international broadcasting was targeted at a specific audience, initially skeptical to the Western media, and did not try to extend it tapping new methods of information and cultural influence. According to the author, the effectiveness of international broadcasting can be improved by a more careful research of socio-cultural characteristics of the western audience and further adaptation of the Russian cultural code.

About the Author

V. S. Sorokina
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the MFA Russian Federation
Russian Federation


References

1. Белозёров В. Некоторые выводы для России и её оборонной политики в свете августовского конфликта // Вооружённый конфликт в Южной Осетии и его последствия. М.: Красная звезда, 2009. С. 16-29

2. Доктрина информационной безопасности Российской Федерации 2016 (5 декабря) [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.scrf.gov.ru/documents/6/5.html (дата обращения: 5.04.2017)

3. Концепция внешней политики Российской Федерации, 2000 (28 июня) [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.scrf.gov.ru/documents/25.html (дата обращения: 5.04.2017)

4. Концепция внешней политики Российской Федерации, 2013 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.mid.ru/foreign_policy/official_documents//asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/122186 (дата обращения: 5.04.2017)

5. Концепция внешней политики Российской Федерации, 2016 (30 ноября). [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.mid.ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/2542248 (дата обращения: 5.04.2017).

6. Почепцов Г.Г. Информационные войны, М.: Рефл-бук; К.: Ваклер, 2000. 280 с.

7. Соловей В.Д. Абсолютное оружие. Основы психологической войны и медиа манипулирования. М.: Эксмо, 2015. 320 с.

8. Швец Д.Ю. Информационная безопасность Российской Федерации в современных международных отношениях: дис. … канд. социол. наук. М., 2005. 153 с.

9. Umland А. Was die Putinversteher missverstehen / Andreas Umland // Die Zeit. 2015. 27 Dezember.

10. Salzen C. Wenn Fakten nicht mehr zählen / Claudia Von Salzen // Der Tagesspiegel. 2015. 06 Januar.

11. Dembinski M., Schmidt H-J., Schoch B., Spanger H-J. Nach dem Kaukasus-Krieg: Einbindung statt Eindämmung Russlands // Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. 2008. №6. 38 р.

12. Gathmann F., Meiritz A., Sonnberger H. Wie die Wahrheit den Krieg verlor / F. Gathmann, A. Meiritz, H. Sonnberger // Der Spiegel. 2008. 13 August.

13. Pleines H., Schröder H. Der bewaffnete Konflikt um Südossetien und internationale Reaktionen // Arbeitspapiere und Materialien. Bremen: Forschungsstelle Osteuropa, 2008. № 97. 83 р.

14. Pratkanis, A.R. Aronson, E. Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. N.Y.: W. H. Freeman & Co, 2001. 432 р.

15. Sapper M. Rückblick auf ein Lehrstück: der Kaukasuskrieg und die Folgen. Berlin: Berliner Wiss.-Verl, 2008. 192 p.

16. Smeltz D., Kafura C., Wojtowicz L. Majority of Americans - Except for Republicans - Back Congressional Inquiry; Survey Shows 30-Year Lows for Russia’s Favorability // Chicago Council on Global Affairs. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.thechicagocouncil.org/publication/americans-support-congressional-inquiry-russian-hack (дата обращения: 5.04.2017).

17. Spengler T. Russland in Europa. Körber-Stiftung. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.koerber-stiftung.de/themen/russland-in-europa/ (дата обращения: 5.04.2017).

18. The Spectator. 2016.22.10. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.spectator.co.uk/magazine/ (дата обращения: 5.04.2017).


Review

For citations:


Sorokina V.S. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE RUSSIAN INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING IN EUROPE AND USA. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2017;(2):127-136. (In Russ.)

Views: 415


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)