SYMBOL OF THE TRINITY IN THE RUSSIAN PHILOSOPHICAL UTOPIA (DM. MEREZHKOVSKY AND D. ANDREEV)
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2018-2-6-136-144
Abstract
The article considers the changes in social religious foundations proposed by utopian projects of Russian philosophy, focusing on the tenet of the Trinity interpretation. For analysis, two utopias were selected («Third Kingdom» of Dm. Merezhkovsky and D.A. Andreev’s «Rose of Peace»), with special attention paid to changing the religious foundations of the future society.
The project of Dm. Merezhkovsky was created within the framework of the «new religious consciousness» concept that took shape in the philosophy of the Silver Century. The union of religion and culture through the spiritual rebirth of a man in a new society is important for the philosopher. The main goal of the project is the Kingdom of God, where the evolution of Christianity took place, a single world church was created, the secret of sex was revealed and the harmony of nature and society was established. His religion of the «Third Testament» should resolve all existing contradictions. Appeal to the symbolism gives him the opportunity to reveal the significance of the religious tenet about the Trinity. In this utopia, feminine plays a leading role, which makes it possible to trace the connection with feminist projects of the XXth century.
D. Andreev’s utopia “Rose of the World”, as well as the project of Dm. Merezhkovsky, is built on new religious teachings of the philosopher, called interreligious by him. The ultimate goal is the World Brotherhood, reminiscent of the ideal of the Kingdom of God. It is also based on the retreatment of the tenet of the Trinity - the introduction of the Female Deity. In the Divine, thus, the polarity of two principles - male and female - manifests itself. The philosopher examines the role of the feminine and the masculine and concludes about the need of their relative balance in the world.
We see two projects offering their vision of religious ideas in the future society, built on Yin-Yang Balance in the world. Philosophers show the importance of the feminine principle, its role in the harmonization of society through the interpretation of the Trinity.
About the Author
N. G. MitinaRussian Federation
Natalya G. Mitina – Doctor of Science (Philosophy), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of General Humanities
Professor of the Department of General Humanities
690990, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, St. of Peter the Great, 3 «A»
Scientific specialization: philosophy of culture, social philosophy
References
1. Aisler Riane Tennenhaus. The Chalice and The Blade: Our History, Our Future. New York, Harper & Row, 1987. 261 p. (Russ. ed.: Aisler R. Chasha i klinok / Per. s angl. L. Vasil’evoi. Moscow, Publishing house of the “Tree of Life”, 1993. Available at: http://www. lib.ru/URIKOVA/AJSLER/klinok.txt (accessed 27 February 2018). 76 p.).
2. Andreev D.L. Roza mira [Rose of the World]. Moscow, Mir Uranii, 2002. 608 p. (In Russian).
3. Berdiaev N.A. O naznachenii cheloveka: opyt paradoksal’noi etiki [On the appointment of a person: an experience of paradoxical ethics]. O naznachenii cheloveka [On the appointment of a person]. Moscow, Publishing house of the Republic, 1993. pp. 20-253 (In Russian).
4. Bogin I. Vechnaia zhenstvennost’ [Eternal Feminity]. Saint-Petersburg, Aleteia, 2003. 488 p. (In Russian). Voronina O.A. Pol/gender kak kategoriia feministkoi filosofii [Sex/gender as a category of feminist philosophy]. Filosofskie issledovaniia - Philosophical researches, 1995, no. 4, pp. 80-98 (In Russian).
5. Gachev G.D. Natsional’nyi Eros v kul’ture [National Eros in Culture]. Natsional’nyi Eros ikul’tura: V 2 t. [National Eros and Culture: in 2 vol.] / sost. G.D. Gachev, L.N. Titova. V. 1: Research. Moscow, Ladomir, 2002. pp. 1-38 (In Russian).
6. Merezhkovskii D.S. Ne sviataia Rus’ (religiia Gor’kogo) [Not holy Russia (Gorky’s religion)]. Akropol’: Izbr. lit.-kritich. stat’I [Acropolis: Select. Lit.-crit. articles]. Moscow, Knizhnaia palata, 1991. pp. 304-314 (In Russian).
7. Merezhkovskii D.S. Iisus neizvestnyi [Jesus is unknown]. Moscow, Republic, 1996. 687 p. (In Russian).
8. Merezhkovskii D.S. Messiia. CH. 2. IX [Messiah. Part. II. IX] [Electronic resource]. Egipetskie romany. Messiia [Egyptian novels. Messiah] // Merezhkovskii D.S. Polnoe entsiklopedicheskoe sobranie sochinenii. Seriia: Elektronnaia biblioteka [Merezhkovsky D.S. Complete encyclopaedic collection of works. Series: Digital Library]. Moscow, IDDK, 2007a. 1 elektron. opt. disk (CD-ROM) (In Russian).
9. Merezhkovskii D.S. Mech. VII. [Sword. VII] [Electronic resource]. Publitsistika. Ne mir, no mech [Publicism. Not the world, but the sword]. Merezhkovskii D.S. Polnoe entsiklopedicheskoe sobranie sochinenii. Seriia: Elektronnaia biblioteka [Merezhkovsky D.S. Complete encyclopaedic collection of works. Series: Digital Library]. Moscow, IDDK, 2007b. 1 elektron. opt. disk (CD-ROM) (In Russian).
10. Merezhkovskii D.S. Taina Zapada. Atlantida – Evropa [Mystery of the West. Atlantis - Europe]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2007c. 671 p. (In Russian).
11. Merezhkovskii D.S. Taina russkoi revoliutsii. Opyt sotsial’noi demonologii. –Glava 23 [Mystery of the Russian Revolution. Experience of social demonology. Chapter 23]. [Electronic resource]. (Rossiia i bol’shevizm). Taina russkoi revoliutsii [(Russia and Bolshevism). The Mystery of the Russian Revolution].
12. Merezhkovskii D.S. Polnoe entsiklopedicheskoe sobranie sochinenii. Seriia: Elektronnaia biblioteka [Merezhkovsky D.S. Complete encyclopaedic collection of works. Series: Digital Library]. Moscow, IDDK, 2007d. 1 elektron. opt. disk (CD-ROM) (In Russian).
13. Rekunenko A. Zhenskoe nachalo – ipostas’ Sviatogo Dukha iznachal’noi Troitsy [The feminine principle is the hypostasis of the Holy Spirit of the original Trinity]. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http:// rekunenko.inc.ru/article_2.htm (accessed 01 March 2018) (In Russian).
14. Riabov O.V. «Matushka-Rus’»: Opyt gendernogo analiza poiskov natsional’noi identichnosti Rossii v otechestvennoii zapadnoi istoriosofii [«Mother Russia»: an Experience of gender analysis of searches of national identity in Russian and Western philosophy of history]. Moscow, Ladomir, 2001. 202 p. (In Russian).
15. Riabov O.V. Russkaia filosofiia zhenstvennosti (XI-XX veka) [Russian philosophy of femininity (XI-XX century)]. Ivanovo, Juno, Ivanovo state University, 1999. 359 p. (In Russian).
16. Silant’eva M.V. Problema ratsional’nosti sovremennoi evropeiskoi filosofii (ekzistentsial’no-dialekticheskii analiz): ucheb.-metod. posobie dlia stud. i aspirantov [The problem of the rationality of modern European philosophy (existential-dialectical analysis): studies.-method. student handbook and graduate students]. Moscow, SASK, 2004. 51 p. (In Russian).
17. Silant’eva M.V. Russkaia filosofiia kak fenomen mirovoi kul’tury: problema obshchego, edinichnogo i osobennogo [Russian philosophy as a phenomenon of world culture: the problem of the general, individual and special]. Vestnik Obshchestva russkoi filosofii pri Ukrainskom filosofskom fonde.Vipusk 10. Russkaia filosofiia: istoriia, metodologiia, zhizn’ [Bulletin of the Society of Russian philosophy at the Ukrainian philosophical Fund. Issue 10. Russian philosophy: history, methodology, life], 2011, pp. 35-42 (In Russian).
18. Chertkova E. Utopiia kak tip soznaniia [Utopia as a type of consciousness]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ - Social Sciences and modernity, 1993, no. 3, pp. 71-81 (In Russian).
19. Chertkova E.L. Spetsifika utopicheskogo soznaniia i problema ideala [Specificity of utopian consciousness and the problem of the ideal]. Ideal, utopia i kriticheskaia refleksiia [Ideal, Utopia and Critical Reflection]. Moscow, ROSPEN, 1996. pp. 156-187 (In Russian).
20. Shterenberg M.I. «Roza Mira» Daniila Andreeva i sovremennost’ [«Rose of the World» by Daniil Andreev and modernity]. Moscow, Polygraph resources, 2000. 240 p. (In Russian).
21. Epshtein M.N. «Roza Mira» Daniila Andreeva: religioznoe otkrovenie ili totalitarnaia utopiia? [«Rose of the World» by Daniil Andreev: religious revelation or totalitarian utopia?]. Otvet M. Epshteina F. Sinel’nikovu i S. Klado [M. Epstein’s answer to F. Sinelnikov and S. Klado]. Available at: http://www.veer. info/28/v28_rozamira_epstein.html (accessed 25 February 2018) (In Russian).
22. Epshtein M.N. Roza Mira i tsarstvo Antikhrista: o paradoksakh russkoi eskhatologii [The Rose of the World and the Kingdom of Antichrist: about the paradoxes of Russian eschatology]. Religiia posle ateizma. Novye vozmozhnosti teologii [Religion after atheism. New possibilities of theology]. Moscow, AST–PRESS KNIGA, 2013. 416 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Mitina N.G. SYMBOL OF THE TRINITY IN THE RUSSIAN PHILOSOPHICAL UTOPIA (DM. MEREZHKOVSKY AND D. ANDREEV). Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2018;(2):136-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2018-2-6-136-144