AH, THE ROADS! OR HOW DEMAGOGIC IDEOLOGEMES WORK
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2019-3-11-167-178
Abstract
This article is an attempt to show how the means of manipulative construction of political reality work on a single example of ideological concept of “road protection”, used a quarter of a century ago by the Georgian authorities as a pretext for a military invasion of Abkhazia. The study revealed that such ideologemes initiate a certain socio-behavioral reflection and allow the aggressor country, under the guise of pseudo-human goals, to carry out both “soft” (humanitarian) and direct (military) expansion. The concept of ideology has acquired special significance for modern political linguistics, and today, in the era of hybrid wars, its analysis and study are more relevant than ever. The aim of the study is to analyze the ideology of “road protection” which highlights the manipulative conceptual features and to prove its demagogic nature. To achieve this goal, we will turn to the events of August 1992 and try to understand the symbolic and ideological concept of “road protection”, used as a lingua-pragmatic background of expansion. The goal is to understand how to use ideological cliches in the minds of the implemented setup, and create unnecessary political mood which enabled the Georgian authorities to implement, not condemned by the international community, the military invasion of the territory of Abkhazia. The novelty of the work lies in the fact that for the first time it introduces and actualizes the concept of demagogic ideology. We define demagogic ideology as a populist-propaganda stamp, manifested itself in a certain historical period as a reality, and characterized by imperativeness and, most importantly, simulativeness. Such ideological cliches are thrown in political discourse with the aim to lull the vigilance and urging them on to obviously incorrect conclusions. Over time, however, demagogic ideologies lose their importance and are perceived as not justified expectations of performance, error, not relevant axiological dominant members of a particular culture. In our work we adhered to the following methods of research: linguoideological – to interpret the content of corresponding ideologies; linguistic and semiotic – with the aim of realizing the symbolic mechanisms used for the influence and formation of the corresponding reactions in the consciousness of the masses; and linguocultural – to identify the causes of certain ideological concepts effectiveness.
About the Author
L. A. AgrbaRussian Federation
Lana A. Agrba – PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, The English and German Languages Department.
384900, the Republic of Abkhazia, Sukhum, 1 University Street
References
1. Bart R. Mifologii [Mythologies]. Moscow, Publishing Sabashnikovs, 1996. 312 p. (In Russian).
2. Bakhtin M.M. Freidizm. Formal’nyi metod v literaturovedenii. Marksizm i filosofiia iazyka [Freudianism. Formal methods in literature. Marxism in language philosophy]. Moscow, Labyrinth, 2000. 640 p. (In Russian).
3. Bakhtin M.M. Problemy tvorchestva Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s work]. Moscow, Alkonost, 1994. 170 p. (In Russian).
4. Belaia kniga Abkhazii. 1992-1993 [The White Book of Abkhazia. 1992-1993]. Moscow, 1993. 357 p. (In Russian).
5. Bodriiiar Zh. K kritike politicheskoi ekonomii znaka [For a critique of the political economy of the sign]. Moscow, Russian book, 2003. 260 p. (In Russian).
6. Voronov Iu. Bol’ moia Abkhaziia [My Pain Abkhazia]. Gagra, 1995. 111 p. (In Russian).
7. Klushina N.I. Obshchie osobennosti publitsisticheskogo stilia [General features of journalistic style]. Iazyk SMI kak ob”ekt mezhdistsiplinarnogo issledovaniia media [Language as an object of interdisciplinary research] / ed. M.N. Volodina. Moscow, Publishing house of Moscow State University, 2003. pp. 269-289 (In Russian).
8. Klushina N.I. Intentsional’nye kategorii publitsisticheskogo teksta (na materiale periodicheskikh izdanii 2000-2008 gg.): avtoref. dis. … dokt. filol. nauk [Intentional categories of the journalistic text (by the material of periodicals of 2000-2008): author. dis. doct. philol. sci.]. Moscow, 2008. 62 p. (In Russian).
9. Klushina N.I. Teoriia ideologem [The theory of ideology]. Politicheskaia lingvistika - Political linguistics, 2014, no. 4 (50), pp. 54-58 (In Russian).
10. Konflikty v Abkhazii i Iuzhnoi Osetii. Dokumenty 1989-2006 gg. [The conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Documents 1989-2006]. Moscow, 2008. 499 p. (In Russian).
11. Kupina N.A. Zhivye ideologicheskie protsessy i problemy kul’tury rechi [Live ideological processes and problems of speech culture]. Iazyk. Sistema. Lichnost’ [Language. System. Personality]. Yekaterinburg, Ural. State Ped. Univ., 2005. pp. 90-104 (In Russian).
12. Malysheva E.G. Ideologema kak lingvokognitivnyi fenomen: opredelenie i klassifikatsiia [The ideologeme as a linguistic and cognitive phenomenon: definition and classification]. Politicheskaia lingvistika - Political linguistics, 2009, no. 4, pp. 32-40 (In Russian).
13. Marr N.Ia. Kavkazovedenie i abkhazskii iazyk [The Caucasus and the Abkhaz language]. O iazyke i istorii abkhazov [About language and history of Abkhazians]. Moscow, 1938. pp. 126-128 (In Russian).
14. Nodia G. Konflikt v Abkhazii: natsional’nye proekty i politicheskie obstoiatel’stva [Conflict in Abkhazia: national projects and political circumstances]. Gruziny i abkhazy. Put’ k primireniiu [Georgians and Abkhaz. The way to conciliation]. Moscow, 1998. pp. 19-67 (In Russian).
15. Petrenko V.F., Mitina O.V. Psikhosemanticheskoe issledovanie politicheskogo mentaliteta [Psychosemantic research of political mentality]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ - Social Sciences and modernity, 1994, no. 6, pp. 82-99 (In Russian).
16. Sorokin A.A. Politicheskie simvoly i ikh vliianie na massovoe soznanie [Political symbols and its influence on mass consciousness]. Trud. Profsoiuzy. Obshchestvo - Labor. Unions. Society, 2013, no. 2, pp. 96-99 (In Russian).
17. Flad K. Politicheskii mif. Teoreticheskoe issledovanie [Political myth. Theoretical research] / tr. from English A.G. Georgiev. Moscow, Progress-Tradition, 2004. 264 p. (In Russian).
18. Chudinov A.P. Politicheskaia lingvistika: uchebnoe posobie [Political Linguistics: A Study Guide]. Moscow, Flint: Science, 2007. 254 p. (In Russian).
19. Shariia V.V. Abkhazskaia tragediia [Abkahz Tragedy]. Sochi, B.I., 1994. 140 p. (In Russian).
20. Iazykova A. Gosudarstva Iuzhnogo Kavkaza v sisteme mezhdunarodnykh koordinat [States of the South Caucasus in the system of international coordinates]. Kavkaz i globalizatsiia - Caucasus and globalization, 2014, T. 8, Vol. 3-4, pp. 7-16 (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Agrba L.A. AH, THE ROADS! OR HOW DEMAGOGIC IDEOLOGEMES WORK. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2019;(3):167-178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2019-3-11-167-178