Name-strategies and antropoiesis discourse in the history of philosophy
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-2-14-7-16
Abstract
Keywords
About the Author
S. G. SelivanovaRussian Federation
Svetlana G. Selivanova — PhD student, Department of Philosophical anthropology
119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Lomonosovsky prospekt, 27-4
References
1. Anscombe G.E.M. 1975. The first person. Mind and language. Wolfson College Lectures 1974. Ed. Guttenplan S. Oxford: Clarendon Press. P.45-65.
2. Crowell S. 2001. Subjectivity: Locating the first-person in Being and Time. Inquiry. Vol. 44(4). P.433-454. DOI: 10.1080/002017401753263243.
3. Denker A. 2010. Historical Dictionary of Heidegger’s Philosophy. 2 nd ed. Lanham, Toronto, Plymouth, UK: The Scarecrow Press, Inc. 462 p.
4. Kachersky L., Carnevale M. 2015. Effects of pronoun brand name perspective and positioning on brand attitude. Journal of Product & Brand Management. Vol. 24 (2). P. 157-164. DOI: 10.1108/JPBM-02-2014-0495.
5. Kachersky L. 2013. How personal pronouns influence brand name preference. Journal of Brand Management. 20 (7). P. 558-570. DOI: 10.1057/bm.2012.61.
6. Rosch E. 1973. Natural Categories. Cognitive Psychology. 4 (3). P. 328-350. DOI: 10.1016/00100285(73)900-17-0.
7. Rosch E. 1978. Principles of Categorization. Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. P. 27-48. Available at: tamaraberg.com/teaching/Fall_13/papers/Cognition&Categorization.pdf (accessed: 14.04.2020).
8. Searle J.R. 1958. Proper Names. Mind, New Series. 67 (266). P. 166-173.
9. Uexkull J. von. 1926. Theoretical biology. New York: Harcourt, Brace&Company, Inc. 362 p.
10. Bakhtin M.M. 2000. Problema tvorchestva Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics]. Sobranie sochinenii. T.2. Moscow: Russkie slovari. P. 5-175 (In Russian).
11. Descartes R. 1995. Razmishlenija o pervonachal’noi filosofii [Meditations on first philosophy]. Saint-Petersburg: Abris-Kniga. 192 p. (In Russian).
12. Fragmenty rannih stoikov [Fragments of The Early Stoa]. 1999. T. 2. Khrisipp iz Sol [Chrysippus of Sol]. Moscow: Greko-latinskii kabinet «Shichalina Iu.A.». 280 p. (In Russian).
13. Heidegger M. 1967. Sein und Zeit. 11te Auflage. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 450 s. (In German) (Russ. ed.: Heidegger M. 2006. Bytie i vremia. Per. s nem. V.V. Bibikhina. 3-e izd. Saint-Petersburg. 452 p.)
14. Kant I. 1968. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlin:Suhrkamp Verlag. 340 s. (Russ.ed.: Kant I. 2006. Kritika chistogo razuma. Moscow: Eksmo. 736 p.).
15. Lakoff G. 2004. Zhenshchiny, ogon’ i opasnye veshchi: chto kategorii yasyka govoryt nam o myshlenii [Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind]. Trans. I.V. Shatunovskogo. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury. 792 p. (In Russian).
16. Luman N. 2007. Sozialnye sistemy [Social systems]. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka. 642 p. (In Russian).
17. Maturana U., Varela, F. 2019. Drevo poznaniia: Biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniia [The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding]. Moscow: URSS, LENAND. 320 p. (In Russian).
18. Plato. 1990. Kratil [Kratilus]. Sobranie sochinenii v 4 t. T. 1 [Works in four volumes. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Mysl’. P. 613-681 (In Russian).
19. Smirnov S.A. 2013. Antropoetika: vvedenie v predmet [Antropoesis: introduction to the subject]. Idei i ideally. Vol. 1. 2 (16). P. 63-77 (In Russian).
20. Stepanov Y.S. 1985. V trehmernom prostranstve yazyka [Three-dimensional space of the language]. Moscow: Nauka. 336 p. (In Russian).
21. Stepanova A.S. 2005. Dejksis i semantika zhesta v uchenii Stoi [Deixis and semantics of gesture in the teachings of Stoа]. Vestnik Sankt-Petersburgskogo Universiteta. Ser. 9. Vyp. 1. P. 88-92 (In Russian).
22. Stepanova A.S. 1995. Filosofia Drevnei Stoi [Philosophy of the Ancient Stoa]. Saint-Petersburg: KN. 272 p. (In Russian).
23. Stolyarov A.A. 1995. Stoya i stoitsizm [Stoa and stoicism]. Moscow: AO Kami Grup. 444 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Selivanova S.G. Name-strategies and antropoiesis discourse in the history of philosophy. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2020;4(2):7-16. https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-2-14-7-16