Evolution of the concept of care: cultural narratives and historical comparisons
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-2-14-17-24
Abstract
The philosophy of «care» has already joined a range of problems extensively discussed by philosophers of various scholarly traditions. Exploring the concept of care as it has been defined in ancient philosophy and the philosophy of the 20th and early 21st centuries allows, firstly, to trace some parallels between two periods of development of philosophical thought; secondly, to recognize the significant potential of this concept while discussing ontological, ethical and existential problems; thirdly, to highlight complex role of the corresponding terminology as a marker of cultural specifics of the «life world», reflected in the conceptual framework of a particular era. Finally, the analysis of «care» through the retrospective synchronization of «antiquity» and «modernity» promotes a deeper perception of the differences in «care» interpretations within various cultural contexts. Such analysis is critically important for defining the methodological significance of this concept for modern social and human sciences, since it reveals the framework nature of social responsibility conceptualization. Therefore? the novelty of the study consists in defining methodological significance of «care» in the framework of modern pedagogical knowledge, as well as systematizing various conceptual models of «care» in ancient and modern philosophy. Theoretical relevance of the research is based on the ability to formulate contextual definitions of «care», as well as to establish its propaedeutic significance in modern pedagogical and educational practices. Having defined the meanings of «care» we can conclude that contemporary culture demands its ancient interpretations be based on the explication of self-knowledge as a high demand social practice.
About the Author
V. V. Volodin
Blagoveschensk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Volodin — PhD student, degree seeker
675000, Blagoveschensk, Lenin str., 104
References
1. Gilligan C. 1982. In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 216 p.
2. Noddings N. 2003. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkley: Univ. of California press. 220 p.
3. Ruddick S. 1989. Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon Press. 291 p.
4. Tronto J.C. 1993. Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge. 226 p.
5. Biemel W. 1993. Martin Heidegger mit Selbstzeugnissen und Bilddokumenten. Hamburg: Reinbekbei Hamburg. 179 s. (In German).
6. Aristotle. 2005. Evdemova etika [Evdemova Ethics]. Per. T.V. Vasil’evoi i dr. Moscow: IF RAN. 448 p. (In Russian).
7. Aristotle. 1983. Sochineniia: v 4-kh t. T.4 [Works: in 4 vols. V. 4]. Per. N.V. Braginskoi i dr. Moscow: Mysl’. 830 p. (In Russian).
8. Apresian R.G. 2008. O prave lgat’ [On the right to lie]. Logos: filosofsko-literaturnyi zhurnal. 5 (68). P. 4-18 (In Russian).
9. Artem’eva O.V. 2000. Etika zaboty: feministskaia al’ternativa klassicheskoi filosofii [Care Ethics: A Feminist Alternative to Classical Philosophy]. Eticheskaia mysl’. Vyp. 1. Moscow: IF RAN. P. 195-215 (In Russian).
10. Bolotnikova E.N. 2016. Filosofskie interpretatsii kontsepta «zabota»: ot «lekarstva» v antichnosti do «zdorovo byt’» v sovremennosti [Philosophical interpretations of the concept of «care»: from «medicine» in antiquity to «great to be» in modern times]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki. № 2. P. 98-103 (In Russian).
11. Cicero. 2000. O predelakh blaga i zla. Paradoksy stoikov [On the limits of good and evil. Paradoxes of the Stoics]. Per. N.A. Fedorovoi. Moscow: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi un-t. 474 p. (In Russian).
12. Dorofeev D.Iu. 2019. Chelovecheskaia identichnost’ v dialoge Platona «Alkiviad I» (k voprosu ob antropologicheskoi problematike v drevnegrecheskoi filosofii) [Human identity in the dialogue of Plato «Alcibiades I» (on the issue of anthropological issues in ancient Greek philosophy)]. Scholae. № 1. P. 251-268 (In Russian).
13. Epictetus. 1997. Besedy [Conversations]. Per. G.A. Taroniana. Moscow: Ladomir. 320 p. (In Russian).
14. Foucault P.-M. 2001. L’Herméneutique du sujet. Paris: Gallimard. 540 p. (In French) (Russ. ed.: Foucault M. 2007. Germenevtika sub”ekta. Per. A.G. Pogoniailo. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka. 677 p.).
15. Heidegger M. 1967. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag Tübingen. 450 s. (In German) (Russ. ed.: Heidegger M. 1993. Bytie i vremia. Per. V.V. Bibikhina. Moscow: Respublika. 447 p.).
16. Kozharova T.V. 2007. Poniatie zaboty v tvorchestve M. Fuko i M. Khaideggera [The concept of care in the works of M. Foucault and M. Heidegger]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriia 6. Politologiia. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. Vol. 2. Part 1. P. 74-83 (In Russian).
17. Kunitsin A.G. 2017. Filosofiia zapada cherez poniatie «zabota» [The philosophy of the West through the concept of «care»]. Vestnik Cheliabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. № 1. P. 70-72 (In Russian).
18. Kunitsyn A.G. 2019. Eticheskoe izmerenie «Zaboty» [The ethical dimension of «Care»]. Manuskript. № 6. P. 144-148 (In Russian).
19. Lekhtsier V.L. 2005. Zabota o sebe i problema filosofskogo obrazovaniia [Self-care and the problem of philosophical education]. Ideia universiteta i topos mysli: materialy konferentsii, posviashchennoi 25-letiiu kafedry filosofii gumanitarnykh fakul’tetov SamGU. P. 51-65 (In Russian).
20. Lifintseva T.P. 2015. «Zabota» Khaideggera, «bytie-dlia-sebia» Sartra i buddiiskaia dukhkkha: ontologiia negativnosti [Heidegger’s «Care», Sartre’s «Being-for-Self», and Buddhist Duhkha: Ontology of Negativity]. Voprosy filosofii. № 7. P. 184-203 (In Russian).
21. Maliakova N.S. 2012. Sushchnostnye kharakteristiki fenomena zaboty v uklade shkol’noi zhizni: mezhdistsiplinarnyi aspekt analiza [Essential characteristics of the phenomenon of care in school life: an interdisciplinary aspect of analysis]. Izvestiia Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena. № 148. P. 134-141 (In Russian).
22. Pichugina V.K., Bezrogov V.G. 2015. Obrazovanie i zabota o sebe v epokhu metamoderna [Education and self-care in the era of metamodern]. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. 3 (38). P. 116-128 (In Russian).
23. Plato. 2016. Dialogi [Dialogs]. Per. V.N. Karpovoi. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka. 448 p. (In Russian).
24. Seneka L. 1986. Nravstvennye pis’ma k Lutsiliu [Moral letters to Lucius]. Per. S. Osherova. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura. 543 p. (In Russian).
25. Volkova S.V. 2017. Dasein, skuka, zabota v sfere obrazovaniia [Dasein, boredom, care in education]. Chelovek. Kul’tura. Obrazovanie. 3 (25). P. 33-49 (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Volodin V.V. Evolution of the concept of care: cultural narratives and historical comparisons. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2020;4(2):17-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-2-14-17-24
Views:
920
Email this article 