Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

Revisiting methodological basis of religiousity research in sports

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-2-14-53-62

Abstract

Sport is still a «blind spot» in religious studies; meanwhile, the phenomenon of modern sport, from the point of view of its sociocultural determination, value and semantic content, is of great interest to the sciences of religious rituals. At first glance, the empirical facts about sport are quite ordinary. For all participants and attentive observers, physical efforts and sport results are fed by carefully constructed worlds of sacred stories, symbols and personal rituals. The increasing number of athletes involved in sports activities claim the priority of spiritual growth in the process of training and competitions over physical metamorphoses. Champions talk frankly about their religious views and demonstrate confessional affiliation, building bridges between personal rituals and their victories or defeats, which makes it possible to think about including sports in the field of religious studies. The objective of the present research is to analyze the theoretical and methodological foundations of studying the phenomenon of athletes’ religious commitment, as well as adapting existing approaches to distinguishing types of religious and non-religious individuals, taking into account the specifics of this group. Based on the results of empirical studies of the last twenty years developed in Russian sociology of religion, the author reveals their potential for solving urgent problems. In this article, the author focuses on the methods of studying the religiosity of modern athletes. One of the problems is the construction of classification demonstrating athletes’ religiosity taking into account the specifics of their activities, as well as the possibilities of representing their beliefs through religious practices before / during / after competitions.

About the Author

E. E. Gres
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Ekaterina E. Gres — PhD student, Department of Philosophy of Religion and Religious Studies, Faculty of Philosophy

119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Lomonosovsky prospekt, 27-4



References

1. Edwards H. 1973. Sociology of Sport. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press. 395 p.

2. Guttmann A. 1978. From Ritual to Record: The Nature of Modern Sports. New York: Columbia University Press. 198 p.

3. Habermas J. 2003. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Policy. 136 p.

4. Kenney B.M. 2016. Foundations of pastoral care: Recovering the spirit of chaplaincy in sport. Practical Theology. 9 (3). P. 183-195.

5. Kobiela P. 2018. Should chess and other mind sports be regarded as sports? Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 45 (3). P. 279-295.

6. McFee G. 2004. Normativity, Justification, and (MacIntyrean) Practices: Some Thoughts on Methodology for the Philosophy of Sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 31 (1). P. 15-33.

7. Morgan W.J. 2000. The Philosophy of Sport: A Historical and Conceptual Overview and a Conjecture Regarding Its Future. Handbook of Sport Studies. Coakley, J. and Dunning, E. (eds.). London: Sage. P. 205-209.

8. Mumford S. 2011. Watching Sport: Aesthetics, Ethics and Emotion. London: Routledge. 168 p.

9. Price J.L. 2009. Playing and praying, sport and spirit: The forms and functions of prayer in sports. International Journal of Religion and Sport. № 1. P. 55-80.

10. Sandel M.J. 2009. The Case Against Perfection: What’s Wrong with Designer Children, Bionic Athletes, and Genetic Engineering. Human Enhancement. J. Savulescu and N. Bostrom (eds.).Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. P. 71-89.

11. Bazarbaev Zh. 1973. Tipologija sovremennyh verujushhih musul’man [Typology of modern Muslim believers]. Filosofskie nauki. № 3. P. 95-101 (In Russian).

12. Filatov S.B. 2002. Religija i obshhestvo. Ocherki religioznoj zhizni sovremennoj Rossii [Religion and society. Essays on the religious life of modern Russia]. Saint-Petersburg: Letnij sad. 486 p. (In Russian).

13. Furman D.E., Kaariajnen K. 2000. Starye cerkvi, novye verujushhie: Religija v massovom soznanii postsovetskoj Rossii [Old churches, new believers: Religion in the mass consciousness of post-Soviet Russia]. Saint-Petersburg: Letnij sad. 248 p. (In Russian).

14. Jung C.G. 1971. Psychological Types. Collected Works of C.G. Jung. Volume 6. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. 608 p. (Russ. ed.: Jung С.-G. 1995. Psihologicheskie tipy. Moscow: Progress-Univers. 720 p.)

15. Nishukov V.S. 2014. Ponjatie sporta [The concept of sport]. Logos. 3 (99). P. 181-190 (In Russian).

16. Sinelina Yu.Yu. 2001. O kriteriyakh opredeleniya religioznosti naseleniya [On the criteria for determining the religiosity of the population]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. № 7. P. 89-96 (In Russian).

17. Smirnov M.Yu. 2007. Sovremennaja rossijskaja sociologija religii: otkuda i zachem? Chast’ vtoraja [Modern Russian sociology of religion: where and why? Vol.2]. Religiovedenie. Nauchno-teoreticheskij zhurnal. № 2. P. 145154 (In Russian).

18. Ugrinovich D.M. 1986. Psihologija religii [Psychology of religion]. Moscow: Politizdat. 352 p. (In Russian). Yablokov I.N. 1979. Sotsiologiya religii [Sociology of religion]. Moscow: Mysl’. 184 p. (In Russian).

19. Yablokov I.N. 2014. Sociologija religii: teoreticheskie aspekty: Monografija [Sociology of Religion: Theoretical Aspects: Monograph]. Moscow: MAKS Press. 260 p. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Gres E.E. Revisiting methodological basis of religiousity research in sports. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2020;4(2):53-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-2-14-53-62

Views: 724


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)