The Crisis of the Concept of Identity in Modern Left-Wing Discourse

The analysis concerns the conceptual crisis within the leftist discourse, which manifests itself in conceptual tensions within the Marxist ideology and philosophy on such cornerstone issues as identity, praxis and practice. The importance of identity for the left idea is connected with both neo-Marxist origins (Frankfurt School) and modern Western left liberalism which fuels the identity debate. The postmodern rejection of activity (Marxist praxis) conditions the identity-practice crisis. Manipulating the category of identity devaluates the concept of class, and, more importantly, the concept of oppression, leading therefore to confusion of the concepts of rights and privileges. The probable reason for that is the general crisis of the subject and, thus, its identity. Inside the left it can be described as saturated generic identity of the working class (Badiou). Instead of praxis, which allows a person to embody the integrity of being, personal identity is built on practices reconceptualized here in terms of identity theory as an economic theory. Practices mean episodic activities, void of continuity and integrity, aimed at increasing one’s market value. Therefore, the left accommodates to neoliberalism, reduces the political activity to activism. The discussion on class issues and the rise of precariat shows that trend. Judith Butler can serve as an example, as her approach defines precariat vulnerable and only able to confront neoliberalism with bodily activation of protest, which only emphasizes precariat’s weakness, incorporates it in neoliberalism, prevents it from realizing its historical subjectivity.

1. Biryukov A.A. 2015. Poiavlenie prekariata ili vozvrashchenie proletariata? (O knige Gaia Stendinga «Prekariat — novyi opasnyi klass») [The Emergence of the Precariat or the Return of the Proletariat? (On Guy Standing book “The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class”)]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia. № 10. P. 158-162 (In Russian).

2. Budraitskis I.B. 2013. Intelligentsiia kak stil’ [Intelligentsia as a Style]. Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal Moscow Art Magazine. № 93. Available at: http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/5/article/31 (accessed: 07.08.2020) (In Russian).

3. Butler J. 2015. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 256 p. (Russ. ed.: Butler J. 2018. Zametki k performativnoi teorii sobraniia. Moscow: Ad Marginem. 248 p.).

4. Buzgalin A.V. 2017. Kreativnaia ekonomika: chastnaia intellektual’naia sobstvennost’ ili sobstvennost’ kazhdogo na vse [Creative Economy: Private Intellectual Property or Everyone’s Ownership of Everything]? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia. № 7. P. 43-53 (In Russian).

5. Buzgalin A.V., Bulavka-Buzgalina L.A., Kolganov A.I. 2020. Marks online: Budushchee marksizma i marksizm budushchego [Marx Online: The Future of Marxism and the Marxism of Future]. Moscow: LENAD. 344 p. (In Russian).

6. Csikszentmihalyi M. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row. 303 p. (Russ. ed.: Csikszentmihalyi M. 2013. Potok: Psikhologiia optimal’nogo perezhivaniia. Moscow: Al’pina Non-fikshn. 464 p.).

7. Egorova A.E. 2018. Avtobiograficheskii podkhod Did’e Eribona v kontekste sovremennykh diskussii o klassovoi identichnosti [Didier Eribon’s Autobiographical Approach in the Context of Contemporary Discussions on Class Identity]. Sotsiologiia vlasti. 30 (4). P. 106-127 (In Russian).

8. Emelin V.A. 2017. Krizis postmodernizma i poteria ustoichivoi identichnosti [The Postmodernist Crisis and the Loss of Stable Identity]. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal. № 2 (26). P. 5-15 (In Russian).

9. Fishman L.G. 2020. Moral’nyi balans sotsial’nogo gosudarstva i pravda levoliberal’nogo diskursa [Moral Balance in Welfare State and the Truth of Left-Liberal Discourse]. Voprosy filosofii. № 5. P. 12-24 (In Russian).

10. Il’enkov E.V. 1984. Chto zhe takoe lichnost’? [What is a Personality?]. S chego nachinaetsia lichnost’ Moscow: Nauka. P. 319-358 (In Russian).

11. Kagarlitskii B.Iu. 2017. Mezhdu klassom i diskursom. Levye intellektualy na strazhe kapitalizma [Between Class and Discourse. How Left Intellectuals Serve Capitalism]. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. 280 p. (In Russian).

12. Kolganov A.I. 2018. Marks-XXI: predely i potentsial sotsial’noi filosofii: Kriticheskie remarki [Marx, 21st century: Limits and Potential of Social Philosophy. Critical Remarks]. Voprosy filosofii. № 6. P. 180-193 (In Russian).

13. Kondrashov P.N. 2020. Marksova kontseptsiia stanovleniia tselostnosti cheloveka [Karl Marx’s Concept of Formation of Human Integrity]. Voprosy filosofii. № 5. P. 36-48 (In Russian).

14. Koriakovtsev A.A. 2013. Revoliutsionnost’ rabochego klassa: marksistskaia teoriia i sovremennaia real’nost’ [Working Class Revolutionism: Marxist Theory and Modern Reality]. Sotsium i vlast’. № 4 (42). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/revolyutsionnost-rabochego-klassa-marksistskaya-teoriya-i-sovremennaya-realnost (accessed 30.05.2019) (In Russian).

15. Shkarin D.L. 2018. Kontsept “krizisa identichnosti” v sovremennom sotsial’no-filosofskom diskurse: teoretiko-metodologicheskii aspect [The Concept of the “Identity Crisis” in Contemporary Social and Philosophical Discourse: The Theoretical and Metodological Aspect]. Vestnik ChelGU. № 5 (415). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontsept-krizisa-identichnosti-v-sovremennom-sotsialno-filosofskom-diskurse-teoretiko-metodologicheskiy-aspekt (accessed 19.04.2019) (In Russian).

16. Sigachev M.I., Sleptsov E.S., Fadeev E.V. 2020. Novyi pravyi populizm: tendentsii i perspektivy na primere riada evropeiskikh gosudarstv (Italiia, Frantsiia, Germaniia, Avstriia) [New Right-Wing Populism: Tendencies and Prospects – Evidence from Some European States (Italy, France, Germany, Austria)]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriia: Politologiia. 22 (3). P. 458-474 (In Russian).

17. Standing, G. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 198 p. (Russ. ed.: Stending G. 2014. Prekariat — novyi opasnyi klass. Moscow: Ad Marginem. 328 p.).

18. Toshchenko Zh.T. 2015. Prekariat — novyi sotsial’nyi klass [The Precariat — a New Social Class]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia. № 6. P. 3-13 (In Russian).

19. Voskanian M.V. 2009. Igra v individualizirovannom obshchestve [A Play in an Individualized Society]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. № 2. P. 170-176 (In Russian).