Does the European Identity Really Exist? An Analysis of the European Unity Value Foundations in the Case of Its Mediatory Role in The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

As the issues of cultural identity (a hidden code that shapes cultural identity of states or supranational organisations) in the context of international actors’ attitudes and world politics as such are topical, it is necessary to analyze specific indicators of such codes and behavior patterns. The tensions between the real attitudes manifested in foreign policy and the values declared in official documents prevent the formation of a single cultural identity, but shed light on real policy drivers. The article deals with the features of cultural identity as a phenomenon in international relations in the particular case of the European Union’s value orientations, indicated in official documents, and the EU foreign policy when mediating the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. As now the EU single cultural space faces internal crisis, it is legitimate to raise the issue of whether single European culture or common European values exist. A particular axiological analysis of EU Common Foreign and Security Policy in the Middle East, of both actions and declarations in the abovementioned peace talks shall contribute to the research. In this context, a passive role of the European Union in such a complex conflict as the Palestinian-Israeli one demonstrates the peculiarities of internal processes in the EU. This allows us to conclude whether the cultural identity of the European Union is real, or whether the EU is a legal fiction, an artificial union of different national identities.

1. Anderson B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London, New York: Verso. 224 p.

2. Barthes R. 1977. Elements of Semiology. Hill and Wang. April 1. P. 28-79.

3. Borg I., Groenen P.J.F. 2005. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. Springer Verlag. Berlin. P. 293-306.

4. Dinan D. 2017. Crisis in EU history. European Union in Crisis London. Red Globe Press. P. 16-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60427-9

5. Gardner Feldman L. 1984. The Special Relationship between West Germany and Israel. London: George Allen & Unwin. P. 112-124.

6. Geertz С. 1973. Thick Descriptions Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. The interpretation of Culture. Ch. 1. New York: Bane book. P. 3-30.

7. Jones E. 2012. Identity and Solidarity. Oxford Handbook on the European Union. New York: Oxford University Press. 746 p.

8. Habermas J. 2006. Why Europe Needs a Constitution. New Left Review. 42 (11). P. 22-38.

9. Hofstede G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. London, New Delhi: Sage Publication. 596 p.

10. Inglehart R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 453 p.

11. Riddervold M. 2010. Interests or Principles? EU Foreign Policy in the ILO. Journal of European Public Policy. 17 (4). P. 581-598.

12. Schwartz S.H. 2006. A theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications. Comparative Sociology. 5 (2-3). P. 137-182.

13. Spencer R. 2019. The Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process. New York: Bombardier Books. 304 p.

14. Wolfers A. 1962. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 283 p

15. Filosofiia kul’tury v sisteme izucheniia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. Kniga 1. Paradoksy issledovatel’skoi prizmy [Philosophy of Culture in the System of International Studies. Book 1. Paradoxes of the Research Prism]. 2020. M.V. Silant’eva, N.I. Biriukov, V.S. Glagolev i dr.; pod obshchei redaktsiei M.V. Silant’evoi; nauchnyi redaktor A.V. Shestopal. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MGIMO-Universiteta. 544 p. (In Russian).

16. Eremina N.V. 2017. Krizis evropeiskoi identichnosti i Brexit [European Identity Crisis and Brexit]. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii. № 2 (19). P. 327-330 (In Russian).

17. Gudalov N.N. 2016. Razvitie i osobennosti pozitsii Evropeiskogo soiuza po osnovnym politicheskim as-pektam razresheniia palestino-izrail’skogo konflikta [Development of the European Union’s Position on Major Political Aspects of the Resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict]. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriia 6. Politologiia. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. № 4. P. 89-107 (In Russian).

18. Ignat’eva O.A. 2017. Vliianie mezhetnicheskoi kommunikatsii na natsional’nuiu identichnost’ i vneshniuiu politiku gosudarstva [The Interethnic Communication Influence on National Identity and State Foreign Policy]. Koncept: filosofiia, religiia, kulʹtura. № 3. P. 104-112 (In Russian).

19. Igumnova L.O. 2011. Normativnye tseli vneshnei politiki Evropeiskogo soiuza [Normative Goals of the European Union Foreign Policy]. Izvestiia Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Istoriia. № 1. P. 154-169 (In Russian).

20. Konyshev V.N. 2020. Neoklassicheskii realizm v teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Neoclassical Re-alism in International Relations Theory]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia. № 4. P. 94-111. DOI: https://doi. org/10.17976/jpps/2020.04.07 (In Russian).

21. Lebedeva M.M. 2017. «Miagkaia sila»: poniatie i podkhody [“Soft power”: Concept and Approaches]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. №. 3 (54). P. 212-223 (In Russian).

22. Litvak N.V. 2014. Zapad — Rossiia — Vostok: tsennosti natsional’nye, geograficheskie i ictoricheckie. [West — Russia — East: National, Geographic and Historic Values]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. № 2 (35). P. 250-252 (In Russian).

23. Lotman M.Iu. 1996. Vnutri mysliashchikh mirov [Inside the Thinking Worlds]. Iazyki russkoi kul’tury. P. 201- 202 (In Russian).

24. Malakhov V.S., Kastsian K.A. 2020. Evrosoiuz pered litsom vynuzhdennoi migratsii: politicheskoe i iuridicheskoe izmerenie [The EU Facing Forced Migration: Legal and Political Dimensions]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia. № 4. P. 139-151 DOI: https://doi. org/10.17976/jpps/2020.04.10 (In Russian).

25. Mikhailin V. 2005. Tropa zverinykh slov: prostranstvenno orientirovannye kul’turnye kody v indoevro-peiskoi traditsii [A Path of Animal Words: Spatially Oriented Cultural Codes in the Indo-European Tradition]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. P. 34-41 (In Russian).

26. Pushkareva G.V. 2017. Idei i tsennosti kak sposob konstruirovaniia simvolicheskogo prostranstva natsional’noi identichnosti. [Ideas and Values as a Way of Constructing Symbolic Space of National Identity] Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia. № 5. P. 156-173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.05.11 (In Russian).

27. Samarkina I.V., Morozova E.V., Miroshnichenko I.V. 2018. Vospriiatie Evropy v molodezhnoi srede v kontekste novykh realii mirovoi politiki [Youth Perceptions of Europe in the Context of New Realities of World Politics]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia. № 3. P. 110-129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.03.08 (In Russian).

28. Sergeev V.M., Kazantsev A.A., Medvedeva S.M. 2019. Krizis konstruktivizma i metodologicheskie problemy izucheniia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [The Crisis of Constructivism and Methodological Problems of Studying International Relations]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia. № 5. P. 56-70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/ jpps/2019.05.05 (In Russian).

29. Shalinskii I.P. 2016. K voprosu o kul’turnom kode kak fenomene [Cultural Code as a Phenomenon]. Zhurnal nauchnykh publikatsii aspirantov i doktorantov. P. 67-69 (In Russian).

30. Shestopal A.V. 2019. Filosofiia i filosofy v kul’ture i praktike mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii (latinoameri-kanskie primery) [Philosophy and Philosophers in International RelationsCulture and Practice (Evidence from Latin America)]. Koncept: filosofiâ, religiâ, kulʹtura. № 2. P. 40-56 (In Russian).

31. Smirnov A.V. 2017. Kollektivnoe kognitivnoe bessoznatel’noe i ego funktsii v logike, iazyke i kul’ture [Collective Cognitive Unconscious and its Functions in Logics, Language and Culture] Vestnik RAN. № 10 (87). P. 867-878 (In Russian).

32. Torkunov A.V. 2018. Bez znaniia sobstvennoi kul’tury i istorii nevozmozhno rabotat’ s zarubezhnymi partnerami [It is Impossible to Work with Foreign Partners without Knowing One’s Own Culture and History]. Koncept: filosofiâ, religiâ, kulʹtura. № 3 (7). P. 7-14 (In Russian).

33. Zykova O.A. 2003. Otnosheniia Evropeiskogo soiuza i Izrailia v kontekste arabo-izrail’skogo konflikta [The EU-Israeli Relations in the Context of the Arab-Israeli Conflict]. Vostokovednyi sbornik. № 5. P. 152-166 (In Russian).