Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

Regulated intentionality as a Modern Educational Model: Philosophical and Cultural Analysis

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-52-61

Abstract

The article is devoted to new directions of personality formation in the postnonclassical value- semantic paradigm of education and science. The existing multidimensional understanding models are in close relationship with the reorientation of a goal-oriented education from a knowledge-centered to a competency-centered one. This shift requires new strategies and techniques for personality formation, with new mentality and objectives. A key role should be devoted to creating a special phenomenological educational environment with intentionality as the driving force of complex structures of consciousness which ensures the identifiability of an object and construction of its meaning. This process becomes possible only within the framework of an intentional act, when the perceptions of the object and its essential content are exposed. As mental intentions and the intentional of the Other are unknown, but new meanings are closely interconnected in the consciousness. In this way knowledge is created: transcendental experience integrates new meanings with those acquired earlier. Sense formation is regulated unconsciously in the mind of a subject. But within the framework of a modern education system, this process can ascend a superior level by regulated meaning formation based on conscious and unconscious intentional acts. Therefore, the development of mechanisms for managing intentional acts of a subject that are relative to sense formation through one’s transcendental experience should be the main focus of innovative education.

About the Author

O. A. Maslovets
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Olga A. Maslovets — PhD in Pedagogy, Head of the Department of Chinese, Vietnamese, Thai and Lao languages

119454, Moscow, prospect Vernadskogo, 76



References

1. Brentano F. 1995. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. 2nd ed., intr. by Peter Simons. London: Routledge. 448 p.

2. Husserl E. 1973. Logical investigations. 2nd, revised edition, 1913. Тrans. by J.N. Findlay. London: Routledge. 331 p.

3. Agapov O.D. 2009. Interpretatsiia kak praktika avtopoezisa chelovecheskogo bytiia [Interpretation as a Practice of Autopoiesis of Human Existence]. Kazan: Poznanie. 247 p. (In Russian).

4. Dudko V.V. 2013. Pedagogicheskaia intentsional’nost’ i ee kriterii [Pedagogical Intentionality and its Criteria]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniia. №. 5 (42). P. 194-196 (In Russian).

5. Eisler R. 1906. Body and soul. Presentation and criticism of recent theories of the relationship between physical and psychological existence. Barth, Leipzig. (Russ. ed.: Eisler R. 2006. Soznanie i bytie. Fundamental’naia psikhologiia u istokov neklassicheskoi paradigmy / [Vil’gel’m Shuppe i dr.]; Sost., predisl. i zakliuchitel’naia st. I.V. Zhuravleva. Moscow: URSS: KomKniga. P. 145-160).

6. Epshtein M.N., Tul’chinskii G.L. 2006. Filosofiia tela. Telo svobody [Philosophy of the Body. A Body of Freedom]. Saint-Petersburg: Aleteiia. 431 p. (In Russian).

7. Gusel’tseva M.S. 2003. Kul’turno-istoricheskaia psikhologiia: ot klassicheskoi k postneklassicheskoi kartine mira [Cultural Historical Psychology: from Classical to Postnonclassical Worldview]. Voprosy psikhologii. № 1. P. 99-115 (In Russian).

8. Husserl E. 1981. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Trans. by F. Kersten. Luxembourg: Springer. 401 p. (Russ. ed.: Husserl E. 2009. Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Kniga pervaia. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. 489 p.).

9. Husserl E. 1981. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Trans. by F. Kersten. Luxembourg: Springer. 401 p. (Russ. ed.: Husserl E. 2008. Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Kniga pervaia. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. 801 p. Available at: http://rumagic.com/ru_zar/sci_philosophy/gusserl/2/j318.html (accessed 02.08.2020).

10. Husserl E. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Trans. by David Carr. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. 405 p. (Russ. ed.: Husserl E. 2004. Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transtsendental’naia fenomenologiia. Saint-Petersburg: SPb un-t. 399 p.).

11. Kanke V.A. 2008. Osnovnye filosofskie napravleniia i kontseptsii nauki. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. [Major Philosophical Movements and Concepts of Science. 3rd ed., Rev. and add.] Moscow: Logos. 397 p. (In Russian).

12. Konev V.A. 2015. Zametki o metodologii sovremennogo obrazovaniia [Notes on the Methodology of Modern Education]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. №. 7 (129). P. 179-182 (In Russian).

13. Lipps T. 1909. Guide to Psychology. 3 ed. Leipzig. (Russ. ed.: Lipps T. 2006. Puti psikhologii. Fundamental’naia psikhologiia u istokov neklassicheskoi paradigmy / [Vil’gel’m Shuppe i dr.]; Comp., Foreword and the Final Art. I.V. Zhuravleva. Moscow: URSS: KomKniga. P. 116-144).

14. Lyotard J.-F. 2001. Fenomenologiya [Phenomenology]. Tr. from French and afterword B.G. Sokolova. Saint- Petersburg: Aletheia. 160 p. (In Russian).

15. May R. 1969 Love and Will. New York: W.W.Norton&Co. 88 p. (Russ. ed.: May R. 2000. Intentsional’nost’. Sud’ba i volia: Psikhologiia svobody: khrestomatiia / sost. K. Sel’chenok. Moscow: Izd-vo Kharvest. 576 p.).

16. Nikonenko S.V. 2017. Intentsional’nost’: amerikanskaia tochka zreniia [Intentionality: An American Perspective]. Horizon. Fenomenologicheskie issledovaniia. 6 (1). P. 9-44 (In Russian).

17. Perler D. 2004. Theories of Intentionality in the Middle Ages. Klostermann. 436 p. (Russ. ed.: Perler D. 2016. Teorii intentsional’nosti v Srednie veka. Per. s nem. G.V. Vdovinoi. Moscow: Izd. dom «Delo». 470 p.).

18. Prokhorov A.I. 2016. Poniatie intentsional’nosti vo vtorom «Kartezianskom razmyshlenii» E. Gusserlia [The concept of Intentionality in the Second “Cartesian Reflection” by E. Husserl]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Filosofiia. №. 4. P. 125-130 (In Russian).

19. Sartre J.-P. 1968. The transcendence of the ego: An existentialist theory of consciousness. Transl., annot. with an introd. by F. Williams, R. Kirkpatrick. 12. print. New York: Noonday press. 119 p. (Russ. ed.: Sartre J.-P. 2015. Transtsendentsiya Ego. Nabrosok fenomenologicheskogo opisaniya. Moscow: IOI. 160 p.).

20. Shchedrovitskii G.P. 2004. Na Doskakh. Publichnye lektsii po filosofii G.P. Shchedrovitskogo [On Boards. Public Lectures on Philosophy by G.P. Shchedrovitsky]. Ed. text, ed. comment. V.L. Danilov. Moscow: Izd-vo Shk. Kul’tur. Politiki. 195 p. (In Russian).

21. Svas’ian K.A. 2010. Fenomenologicheskoe poznanie: propedevtika i kritika [Phenomenological Cognition: Propaedeutics and Criticism]. Moscow: Al’ma Mater: Akad. proekt. 206 p. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Maslovets O.A. Regulated intentionality as a Modern Educational Model: Philosophical and Cultural Analysis. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2020;4(3):52-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-52-61

Views: 563


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)