The Orthodox Media Perception of the Saint Petersburg Students: a Lost Generation or a Lost Sheep
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-105-119
Abstract
The paper addresses the issue of attitudes to religion and, in particular, to Russian Orthodoxy, of the Russian youth with the focus on the effects of secular and religious mass media. Both religion and media are integral parts of social interaction, with mediatization taking shape challenging Orthodox media. The research used qualitative survey methodology to grasp students’ attitudes. It showed that the informative activities of Russian Orthodox media have an insignificant effect. The main sources from which the youth gets specific information about the church are federal and regional media. But it would be too preliminary to conclude that student youth is a lost generation for the Russian Orthodox Church, as only a tiny fraction of young people call themselves Orthodox. This implies that not only the mediatization, but rather atheism or not-observance plays a major role in student indifference. A content analysis of top local media outlets of Saint Petersburg on the issue of the church activities coverage shows that providing news and information is one-sided and weak in secular media. The distorted image of the Russian Orthodox Church in secular media pushes the youth away from confessional media. Thus, the youth remains doubtful when the latter is concerned, and are trapped in secular media bias.
About the Authors
E. V. RodionovaRussian Federation
Elizaveta V. Rodionova — PhD in Sociology, Associated Professor on the Department of Sociology of Culture and Communication
199034, Saint-Petersburg, Universitetskaya embankment, 7/9
V. D. Kovalenko
Russian Federation
Vladimir D. Kovalenko — Senior Analyst
199178, Saint-Petersburg, Smolenka river embankment, 2
References
1. Campbell H.A., Arredondo K., Dundas K., Wolf C. 2018. The Dissonance of “Civil” Religion in Religious- Political Memetic Discourse during the 2016 Presidential Elections. Social Media + Society. № 4. P. 1-15.
2. Couldry N., Hepp A. 2017. The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. 290 p.
3. Fischer-Nielsen P. 2012. The Internet Mediatization of Religion and Church. Mediatization and Religion: Nordic Perspectives. Göteborg: Nordicom. P. 45-63.
4. Hjarvard S. 2008. The Mediatisation of Religion: a Theory of the Media as Agents of Religious Change. Northern Lights. № 6. P. 9-26.
5. Krotz F. 2009. Mediatization. A Concept with Which to Grasp Media and Societal Change. Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang. P. 21-41.
6. Lied I.L. 2012. Religious Change and Popular Culture. With a Nod to the Mediatization of Religion De-bate. Mediatization and Religion: Nordic Perspectives. Göteborg: Nordicom. P. 163-183.
7. Mitchell J. 2015. Journalism. The Routledge Companion to Religion and Popular Culture. Edited by John C. Lyden and Eric Michael Mazur. London: Routledge. P. 65-79.
8. Astakhova L.S., Bukharaev Y.V. 2019. Strategii votserkovleniia v sovremennom rossiiskom obshchestve: mezhdu sotsiologiei i teologiei [Churching Strategies of Church in the Modern Russian Society: between Sociology and Theology]. Traditsionnye religii za sil’nuiu Rossiiu: religiia i politika v mnogopoliarnom mire: kollektivnaia monografiia. Saint-Petersbutg: Tsentr etnoreligioznykh issledovanii: Liubavich. P. 23-50 (In Russian).
9. Badmatsyrenov T.B, Skvortsov M.V., Khandarov F.V. 2018. Buddiiskie tsifrovye praktiki transtsendent-nosti: VK-soobshchestvo «Khambo Lama Dashi-Dorzho Itigelov» [Buddhist Digital Practices of Transcendence: VK-community “Hambo Lama Dashi-Dorjo Itigelov”]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny. № 2. P. 309-332 (In Russian).
10. Baudrillard J. 1991. La guerre du Golfe n’a pas eu lieu. Paris: Galilée. 99 p. (In French) (Russ. ed.: Baudrillard Z. 2019. Dukh terrorizma. Voiny v zalive ne bylo: sbornik. Moscow: Ripol Classic. 224 p.).
11. Bourdieu P. 1996. Sur la télévision, suivi de L’Emprise du journalisme. Paris: Liber-Raisons d’agir. 94 p (In French) (Russ. ed.: Bourdieu P. 2002. O televidenii i zhurnalistike. Moscow: Fond nauchnykh issledovanii “Pragmatika kul’tury”, Institut eksperimental’noi sotsiologii. 160 p.).
12. Divisenko K.S., Divisenko O.V. Vliianie konfessional’noi prinadlezhnosti i votserkovlennosti na udovlet-vorennost’ zhizn’iu veruiushchikh [The Impact of Confessional Affiliation and Church Affiliation on Believers’ Life Satisfaction]. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriia: Sotsiologiia. Vol. 10. Issue 1. P. 99-114 (In Russian).
13. Dobrokhotova M.A. 2014. Cpetsifika pravoslavnoi mediasfery v Rossii v 1990-2000-e gg. na primere pechatnykh periodicheskikh izdanii [Specifics of the Orthodox Media Sphere in Russia in 1990-2000-s on the Example of Printed Periodicals]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriia: Istoriia. Issue 2 (25). P. 134-142 (In Russian).
14. Grishaeva E.I., Shumkova V.A. 2018. Traditsionalistskie pravoslavnye media: struktura diskursa i osobennosti funktsionirovaniia [Traditionalist Orthodox Media: the Structure of Discourse and Features of their Functioning]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny. № 2. P. 291- 308 (In Russian).
15. Kovalenko V.D. 2019. Den’ Pobedy i pravoslavnaia paskha: otrazhenie prazdnikov v media vlastnykh organov [Victory Day and the Orthodox Easter: Reflection of Holidays in State In-House Media]. Uprav-lencheskoe konsul’tirovanie. № 12 (132). P. 182-190 (In Russian).
16. Lakoff J., Johnson M. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 256 p. (Russ. ed.: Lakoff J., Johnson M. 2004. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. Moscow: Editorial URSS. 252 p.).
17. Lakoff G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago; London: Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 632 p. (Russ. ed.: Lakoff J. 2004. Zhenshchiny, ogon’ i drugie opasnye veshchi: chto kategorii iazyka govoriat nam o myshlenii? Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury. 792 p.).
18. Lebedev S.D., Sklyarova V.A. 2019. Sotsial’nyi zapros na znanie o religii v sovremennom rossiiskom ob-shchestve v otsenkakh ekspertov [Social Demands of Knowledge of Religion in the Modern Russian Society as Assessed by Expert Community]. Nauchnyi rezul’tat. Sotsiologiia i upravlenie. 5 (2). P. 25-36 (In Russian).
19. Marakasova A., Chudova I.A. 2015. Apelliatsiia k massam: analiz diskursa novostei [Appealling to the Masses: an Analysis of the News Discourse]. Sovremennyi diskurs-analiz. № 2 (13). P. 31-48 (In Russian).
20. Ostrovskaya E.A. 2018. Rossiiskaia sotsiologiia religii: religiia obshchestva (vstupitel’naia stat’ia priglashennogo redaktora) [Russian Sociology of Religion: Religion of Society (Introductory Article of the Guest Editor)]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia : Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny. № 2. P. 1-31 (In Russian).
21. Rodionova E.V. 2018. Konfliktogennyi potentsial religioznykh ustanovok zhitelei megapolisa: po materi-alam issledovaniia v Sankt-Peterburge [Conflict Potential of the Megalopolis Residents’ Religious Attitudes: from a Research in Saint-Petersburg]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremen. № 2. P. 209-224 (In Russian).
22. Rodionova E.V. 2019. Religioznost’ v Sankt-Peterburge: sotsiologicheskii srez [Religiosity in Saint-Pe-tersburg: a Sociological Snapshot]. Traditsionnye religii za sil’nuiu Rossiiu: religiia i politika v mnogopoliarnom mire: kollektivnaia monografiia. Saint-Petersburg: Tsentr etnoreligioznykh issledovanii: Liubavich. P. 50-67 (In Russian).
23. Rossiiskii statisticheskii iezhegodnik [Russian Statistical Yearbook]. 2018. Stat.sb. / Rosstat. – P76. Moscow. 694 p.
24. Yemelyanov N.N. 2018. Paradoks religioznosti: otkuda berutsia veruiushchie? [The Paradox of Religios-ity: Where do Believers Come from?]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny. № 2. P. 32-48 (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Rodionova E.V., Kovalenko V.D. The Orthodox Media Perception of the Saint Petersburg Students: a Lost Generation or a Lost Sheep. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2020;4(3):105-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-105-119