Modern Church Architecture as an Intercultural Space of Aesthetic and Moral Communication
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-149-157
Abstract
The paper analyses the messages modern architecture communicates to audience and to individual. Architects and theologians regard a church as a community place, and raise questions of aesthetic features of church buildings. At the same time, church space is essential to the visitors’ abilities to remember, to compassionate and to concentrate.
The article focuses on the concepts of three modern theologians: Thomas Erne, Bert Daelemans and Sigurd Bergmann. According to Erne, churches are becoming a space of self-transcendence; they are open to various social and aesthetic values within the sphere of the infinite. Daelemans formulates three dimensions of a church building — synaesthetic, kerygmatic and eucharistic — and doing so, establishes the notion of theotopy, the nonverbal theology of architecture. Bergmann considers the sacred place as a critical place. In addition, architects seek not only the theological reflection on such spaces, but also on solutions that reveal their transcendental dimension.
Church architecture gives an opportunity to express the inexpressible by figurative means, keeping in mind the thoughts of the visitors. A complex religious space, a church is presented to a person and, therefore, can be grasped in a range of ways. So the church space is constructed. Overall, as a space for dialogue and communication, which is not only a religious, but also an aesthetic and moral construct, a temple remains significant despite secularization trends.
About the Author
V. V. BarashkovRussian Federation
Viktor V. Barashkov — PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Humanitarian Institute
600000, Vladimir, Gorky str., 87
References
1. Daelemans B. 2015. Spiritus Loci: a Theological Method for Contemporary Church Architecture. Leiden; Boston: Brill. 398 p.
2. Rocca E. 2015. The Fullness of Space. Transcendence and Sensoriness: Perceptions, Revelation, and the Arts. Ed. by S.A. Christoffersen, G. Hellemo etc. Leiden; Boston: Brill. P. 355-374.
3. Sandal M. 2015. Introduction to Part 4. Transcendence and Sensoriness: Perceptions, Revelation, and the Arts. Ed. by S.A. Christoffersen, G. Hellemo etc. Leiden; Boston: Brill. P. 349-354.
4. Bergmann S. 2017. Der sakrale Ort als kritischer Ort. Skizzen zur befreienden Ästh / Ethik heiliger Räume und Atmosphären. Wandel und Wertschätzung. Synergien für die Zukunft von Kirchenräumen. Hgg. von Albert Gerhards und Kim de Wildt. Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner. S. 279-305 (In German).
5. Erne T. 2017. Hybride Räume der Transzendenz. Wozu wir heute noch Kirchen brauchen. Studien zu einer postsäkularen Theorie des Kirchenbaus. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt. 254 s. (In German).
6. Gerhards A. 2017. Transformation von Kirchenräumen. Ein zukunftsweisendes Projekt für Kirche und Ge-sellschaft. Wandel und Wertschätzung. Synergien für die Zukunft von Kirchenräumen. Hgg. von Albert Gerhards und Kim de Wildt. Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner. S. 13-27 (In German).
7. Schiefer H. 2017. Die Rückkehr der einfachen Naturstoffe? Material als Ausdrucksträger von Handwerk und Tradition. Materialität des Heiligen. Materialwahl, Materialwirkung und Materialbewertung in der christlichen Kunst des 20. Jahrhunderts. Hg. von Hans Körner, Jürgen Wiener. Essen: Klartext Verlag. S. 179-188 (In German).
8. Wittmann-Englert K. 2010. Site-specific architecture — Kontextsensibles Bauen an historisch besetzten Orten. Moderne Kirchenbauten als Erinnerungsräume und Gedächtnisorte. Hg. von Kai Kappel, Matthias Müller, Felicitas Janson. Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner. S. 165-177 (In German).
9. Barashkov V.V. 2018. Obrazno-esteticheskie traditsii i innovatsii v sovremennoi zapadnoevropeiskoi khris-tianskoi tserkovnoi arkhitekture [Aesthetical Traditions and Innovations in the Modern Christian Church Architecture in Western Europe]. Izvestiia Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia «Politologiia. Religiovedenie». Vol. 23. P. 137-145 (In Russian).
10. Bergmann S. 1995. Geist, der Natur befreit: Die trinitarische Kosmologie Gregors von Nazianz im Horizont einer ökologischen Theologie der Befreiung. Mainz: Grünewald. 522 s. (In German) (Russ. ed.: Bergman S. 1999. Dukh, osvobozhdaiushchii prirodu. Arkhangelsk: Izd-vo PGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova. 538 p.).
11. Bystrova T.Iu. 2009. Peter Tsumtor: Chasovniasv. Benedikta v Zumvitge [Peter Zumthor: Chapel of St. Ben-edict in Sumvitg]. Akademicheskiĭ vestnik Ural NII proekt RASN. № 3. P. 58-66 (In Russian).
12. Glagolev V.S. 2012. Smysl obraza i obraz mysli — dvuedinaia zadacha religiozno-esteticheskoi problema-tiki [The Meaning of the Image and the Image of the Meaning – A Double Task of Religious and Aesthetic Problematics]. Religioznostʹ: lichnostʹ pered vyzovami bytiia. Materialy mezhdunarodnykh nauchnykh konferentsii, Vol. 21. Vladimir: Izd-vo VlGU. Р. 267-275 (In Russian).
13. Dutsev M.V. 2017. Khudozhestvennoe izmerenie sredy: gorod kak posrednik [The Artistic Dimension of the Environment: the City as an Intermediary]. Sovremennaia arkhitektura mira: vyp. 9. Moscow: Nestor-Istoriia. P. 9-34 (In Russian).
14. Kamyshanov K. 2019. Arkhitektor Andrei Anisimov: dukh istorii i predvidenie budushchego. K 30-letiiu tvorcheskoi deiatelʹnosti [The Architect Andrey Anisimov: the Spirit of History and the Prediction of the Future. On the 30th Anniversary of His Work]. Dary. Alʹmanakh sovremennoi khristianskoĭ kulʹtury. P. 104-114 (In Russian).
15. Kildiashova T.A., Ivshina O.S. 2016. Sovremennaia khristianskaia khramovaia arkhitektura kak prostranstvo dialoga religii i iskusstva [Contemporary Christian Church Architecture as a Space of Dialogue between Religion and Art]. Akademicheskoe issledovanie i kontseptualizatsiia religii v XXI veke: traditsii i novyevyzovy: sb. Materialov Tretʹego kongr. ros. Issledovatelei religii (7-9.10.2016, Vladimir, VlGU). V 6 t. T. 6. Vladimir: VlGU. P. 231-246 (In Russian).
16. Kreidun Iu.A., Lidov A.M. 2018. Sviataia Zemlia v prostranstve khrama. Novaia tserkovʹ Sviatykh Vifleem-skikh mladentsev v Barnaule [Holy Land in the Church Space. The New Church of the Holy Bethlehem Innocents in Barnaul]. Moscow-Barnaul: Izd-vo «Altaiskii dom pechati». 112 p. (In Russian).
17. Lefebvre H. 1974. La production de l’espace. Paris: Éditions Anthropos. 485 p. (In French) (Russ. ed.: Lefebvre H. 2015. Proizvodstvo prostranstva. Moscow: Strelka Press. 432 p.).
18. Makarova A. 2018. Tserkovnaia arkhitektura Frantsii. Poiski XX veka [French Church Architecture. The Quests of the 20th Century]. Dary. Alʹmanakh sovremennoi khristianskoi kulʹtury. P. 100-117 (In Russian).
19. Nevliutov M.R. 2018. Ritualʹnye istoki arkhitektury [Ritual Origins of Architecture]. Sovremennaia arkhitektura mira: vyp. 11. P. 229-241 (In Russian).
20. Shvidkovskii D.O. 2017. Masshtab chelovecheskogo i «nechelovecheskogo» v sovremennoi arkhitekture [The Scale of the Human and «Non-human» in Modern Architecture]. Antropologiia iskusstva. Iazyk iskusstva i merachelovecheskogo v meniaiushchemsia mire. Moscow: INDRIK. P. 163-178 (In Russian).
21. Suprygina G.G. 2008. Evreiskii muzei v Berline [Jewish Museum in Berlin]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriia. 2 (3). P. 69-84 (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Barashkov V.V. Modern Church Architecture as an Intercultural Space of Aesthetic and Moral Communication. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2020;4(3):149-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-149-157