The Evolution of Symbolist Ideas in the Zolotoe Runo Magazine

The article treats the role art magazine Zolotoe runo played in history of symbolist’s theoretical ideas. By 1906, symbolism as a philosophical and aesthetic movement enters a crisis stage (and, then, a renaissance) — the pioneering movement has become utterly formal, tendentious, and has even acquired public recognition, which contradicts the modernist spirit. Zolotoe runo turns into a platform for the adversaries of outdated, decadent or individual symbolism, changing the symbolist nature and landscape. V. F. Khodasevich suggests that not only hasn’t symbolism been yet studied, but it also doesn`t seem to have been even read. This phenomenon and its notion deserve proper research. The scientific community’s interest in this movement is growing, as the importance of symbolism comes to light, and it becomes more evident that it was not only a milestone in history, but it also predetermined many trends in the development of culture and art up to the present day. Apart from that, the extreme heterogeneity within the symbolist movement and its paradoxical and unexpected metamorphoses are rarely understood. Nonetheless, through the analysis of such magazines as Zolotoe runo, and by drawing upon the research of cultural scientists, art historians and literary critics, we can clarify the features of symbolism, contradictory and holistic at the same time.

1. Gray C. 1962. The Great Experiment. Russian Art 1863–1922. New York: Thames and Hudson Limited. 328 p.

2. Richardson W. 1986. Zolotoe Runo and Russian Modernism: 1905–1910. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ardis. 231 p.

3. Bely A. 1989. Nachalo veka [ The beginning of the Сentury]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura. 707 p. (In Russian).

4. Bely A. 1994. Problema kul’tury [Problem of Culture]. Kritika. Estetika. Teoriia simvolizma. V 2-kh tt. T. 2. Moscow: Iskusstvo. P. 42-58 (In Russian).

5. Benois A.N. 1990. Moi vospominaniia. T. II. Kn. III i IV [My Memories. V. II. B. III, IV] Otv. red. D.S. Likhachev. Moscow: Nauka. 1492 p. (In Russian).

6. Brodskiy N.L., Sidorov N.P. (sost.) 1924. Literaturnye manifesty I. Rossiia: Ot simvolizma do «Oktiabria» [Literary Manifestos: from Symbolism to the October Revolution] Moscow: Novaia Moskva. 303 p. (In Russian).

7. Chulkov G.I. 1999. Gody stranstvii [Years of Wandering]. Moscow: Ellis Lak. 864 p. (In Russian).

8. Diaghilev S.P. 1899. Nash mnimyi upadok [Our Supposed Decadence]. Mir iskusstva. № 01-12. P. 1-11 (In Russian).

9. Evgen’ev-Maksimov V.E., Maksimov D.E. 1930. Iz proshlogo russkoi zhurnalistiki [From the History of Russian Journalism] Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo pisatelei v Leningrade. 304 p. (In Russian).

10. Ivanov V.I. 1910. Zavety simvolizma [The Precepts of Symbolism]. Apollon. № 8. P. 5-20 (In Russian).

11. Kling O.A. 1984. Bryusov v «Vesakh». K voprosu o roli Briusova v organizatsii i izdanii zhurnala [Bryusov and his Work in «Libra» Magazine. On the Question of the Role of Bryusov in the Organization and Publication of the Magazine]. Iz istorii russkoi zhurnalistiki nachala XX v. Moscow: Nauka. P. 160-187 (In Russian).

12. Lavrov A.V. 2007. Russkie simvolisty: etiudy i razyskaniia [Russian Symbolists: Sketches and Research]. Moscow: Progress-Pleiada. 696 p. (In Russian).

13. Lavrov A.V. 1984. Russkaia literatura i zhurnalistika nachala XX v. 1905-1917. V dvukh knigakh. Kniga 2-aia [Russian Literature and Journalism at the Beginning of the XX Century. In two books. Book 2]. Moscow: Nauka. 366 p. (In Russian).

14. Lotman Iu.M. 1994. Besedy o russkoi kul’ture. Byt i traditsii russkogo dvorianstva [Conversations about Russian Culture. Life and Traditions of Russian Nobility]. Saint-Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPb. 400 p. (In Russian).

15. Pyman A. 2006. A History of Russian Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 506 p. (Rus ed.: Pyman A. 2000. Istoriia russkogo simvolizma. Avtorizovannyi per. s angl. V.V. Isaakovich. Moscow: Respublika. 415 p.).

16. Sternin G.Iu. 1970. Khudozhestvennaia zhizn’ Rossii na rubezhe XIX-XX vv. [Artistic Life in Russia at the Turn of the XIX-XX centuries]. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 292 p. (In Russian).