Taching Traditions and the Logic of University Education Modernization in Serbia: a Historical and Cultural Essay

The article is dedicated to the issue of modernizing Serbian university education. Modernization as a transnational process has had a tangible influence on education. The debate on modern university education highlights the education models associated with pan-European traditions, with the German one serving as a key and needing to be localized. In historical and cultural context Serbia has always been open to accommodate efficient Western practices to local realities. The central challenge to such a modernization is to meet existing needs of scientific development, expert qualification and preserve the cultural continuity throughout the history. The University of Belgrade, the first one in the country and a leading one, followed the German academy model. However, its development was conditioned by cultural and political shifts, with changes in educational policy after each of the World Wars and the student movement of 1968 serving as examples. The Faculty of Philosophy has always had a special place among the oldest university schools, intertwining the classics (which later manifested themselves in philological research) and the positivist knowledge (history, psychology, sociology, etc.). Modern teaching demonstrates the continuity of traditions combined with innovations, which is essential to development of any educational system. This trend meets the national interests of Serbia as a European country, with its great history and openness to peaceful intercultural communication.

1. Raitskaya L., Tikhonova E. 2019. Skills and Competencies in Higher Education. Journal of Language and Education. 5 (4). P. 4-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.10186.

2. Roy O. 2017. Globalized Islam: the Search for a New Ummah. Islamology. 7 (1). P. 11-40.

3. Ruso J. et al. 2015. Quality Infrastructure in Higher Education — The case of Serbia. The 2015 International Conference on Education and Modern Educational Technologies (EMET). P. 135-139.

4. Ruso J., Filipović J., Pejović G. 2017a. The Role of Higher Education in National Quality Infrastructure Policy-Making. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies. 22 (1). P. 15-24.

5. Ruso J., Filipović J., Ranković B. 2017b The Serbian Quality Infrastructure as Viewed by the Quality Managers. Serbian Journal of Management. 12 (2). P. 291-301.

6. Samardžić R., Duškov M. 1993. Serbs in European civilization. Belgrade: Nova, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for Balkan Studies. 203 p.

7. Thayer W., Collingwood-Selby E., McGlazer R. 2019. The Non-Modern Crisis of the Modern University. Critical Times. 2 (1). P. 59-84.

8. Vaupell C., Wakkee I., Van Der Sijde P. 2017. The University’s Role in Sustainable Development: Activating Students as Agents of Change. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2017 (1). P. 12083.

9. Samardžić R. 1994. Mehmed Sokolovitch: le destin d’un grand vizir. Paris: L’age d’homme. 467 р. (In French).

10. Fridman M.F. 2016. Rol’ i mesto sovremennogo universiteta v formirovanii novoi kul’turno-istoricheskoi paradigmy razvitiia chelovecheskoi tsivilizatsii [The Role and Place of the Modern University in the Formation of a New Cultural and Historical Paradigm for the Development of Human Civilization]. Kul’turnoe nasledie Rossii. № 2. P. 4-11 (In Russian).

11. Koloskov E.A. 2018. Kosovskii mif v serbskom politicheskom diskurse (1986–1991) [The Kosovo Myth in Serbian Political Discourse (1986–1991)]. Slavianskii mir: obshchnost’ i mnogoobrazie. № 1. P. 124-128 (In Russian).

12. Koloskov E.A. 2016. Kosovskii mif v sovremennoi serbskoi i albanskoi istoriografii: etapy i osnovnye tendentsii [The Kosovo Myth in Contemporary Serbian and Albanian Historiography: Stages and the Main Trends]. Peterburgskie slavianskie i balkanskie issledovaniia. № 2. P. 152-168 (In Russian).

13. Mironov V.V. 2019. «Moi optimizm – sderzhannyi»: o filosofii, obrazovanii i cheloveke v sovremennoi rossiiskoi kul’ture [“My Optimism is Restrained”: about Philosophy, Education and Man in the Modern Russian Culture]. Kontsept: filosofiia, religiia, kul’tura. № 2. P. 9-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2019-2- 10-9-26 (In Russian).

14. Suvorova V.A., Bronnikov I.A. 2019. Mezhdunarodnaia obrazovatel’naia migratsiia kak «resurs miagkoi sily» v epokhu globalizatsii [International Educational Migration as a “Soft Power Resource” in the Globalization Era]. Upravlenie. 7 (4). P. 131-139. DOI: 10.26425/2309-3633-2019-4-131-139 (In Russian).

15. Terzich S. 2015. Staraia Serbiia (XIX-XX vv.). Drama odnoi evropeiskoi tsivilizatsii [Old Serbia (19th-20th cen-turies). Drama of a European Civilization]. Moscow: Veche. 480 p. (In Russian).

16. Tsibizova I.M. 2015. 2015.02.033. Zhunich S. Skazuemoe i sushchee: istoriia poniatiinoi logiki u serbov [Zhunich S. Predicate and Essence: the History of Conceptual Logic of the Serbs]. Review on: Žunjić S. Prirok i suštastvo: istorija pojmovne logike kod srba. Beograd: Službeniglasnik, 2013. Deo 4: Suštastvo u srpskoй filozofiji. 245 p. (Bibl. d-voinauka. Filozofija). Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaia i zarubezhnaia literatura. Ser. 3, Filosofiia: Referativnyi zhurnal. № 2. P. 173-185 (In Russian).

17. Shchelkunov M.D. 2018. Chem riskuet klassicheskii universitet v sovremennom obshchestve [What are the Risks of a Classical University in Modern Society]. Filosofskie nauki. № 2. P. 83-92. DOI: https://repository.kpfu. ru/?p_id=169331 (In Russian).

18. Blagoević M. 1990. Voјno-istoriјske rekonstruktsiјe Kosovske bitke [Historical Military Reenactments of the Kosovo Battle]. Kosovska bitka u istoriografija (Zbornikradova 11) [Kosovo Battle in Historiography (Proceed-ings 11)]. Odgovorni urednik S. Terziћ [Editor-in-Chief S. Terzić]. Belgrade: Zmaј.P. 18-22 (In Serbian).

19. Cvijić J. 1913. Antropo geografski problemi Balkansokoga poluostrova [Anthropogeographic Problems of the Balkan Peninsula]. Belgrade. 238 p. (In Serbian).

20. Miloslavљević P. 1977. Srbi — profesori Harkovskog univerziteta [Serbian Professors of Kharkiv University]. Balcanica. Т. 8. Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for Balkan Studies. P. 257-269 (In Serbian).

21. Petroniјević B. 1924. Hegel i Hartman [Hegel and Hartmann]. Belgrade: Geca Kon. 151 p. (In Serbian).

22. Samardžić R., Ćirković S., Zhiroević O., Triković R., Bataković D.T., Ćureti V., Ćavoshski K., Јevetić A. 1989. Kosovo i Metohiјa u srpskoј istorii [Kosovo and Metohija in Serbian History]. Belgrade. 436 p. (In Serbian).

23. Zhuњić S. 2013. Prirok i sushtastvo: Istorija pojmovne logike kod Srba [Cause and Essence: A History of Con-ceptual Logic among the Serbs]. Deo 4: Sushtastvo u srpskoĭ filozofiji [Part 4: Essence in Serbian Philosophy]. Belgrade: Official Gazette. 245 p. (In Serbian).