The History of the Becoming of the Self-Conscious Soul as the Culminating
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2021-1-17-8-24
Abstract
The article dwells on the amalgam of meanings and interpretations that have arisen in connection to Andrei Bely’s major work of the 1920s The History of the Becoming of the Self-Conscious Soul. This paper is dedicated to the first complete edition of this literature and philosophical piece that took place in 2020, two decades after the book was first — and partially — published in 1999. The very process of publishing and the temporal gaps that marked the stages in the life of this work is important for better understanding of the trends in interpreting the motifs and concepts of Bely. This study anticipates the inconsistencies of various attempts to understand the conceptual mechanism of Bely and thus has the scope of clarifying such concerning takes and contrasting them to the ways of addressing conceptual issues that Bely uses in his entire oeuvre. With the 1999 publication fueling interest to the self-conscious soul, it represented, however, just a first approximation — and this one, quite incoherent in interpretations, should be amplified towards a fuller elaboration. The analyzed corpus of secondary literature reveals that in a few articles devoted to main ideas of The History of the Becoming of the Self-Conscious Soul there are numerous inaccuracies of perception and reinterpretation even in the basic concepts. For better understanding of Bely, it is fruitful to consider his ideas not from outside worldview positions. Quite the opposite, do it with the view to internal consonance, to anthroposophical foundations. Otherwise, misunderstanding of such concepts as culture, individual, I, personality, self-consciousness is inevitable. The article notes a number of features of their modern perception. First, these concepts are taken not in the dynamic, variable, gradational way, but in a rational and static way, with one or more meaning torn out of the variation series. Further, Bely, contrary to his own judgments about the Steinerian foundations of his work, is considered to have various influences and parallels, based on external similarities. Finally, Bely’s anthroposophical ideas themselves are reinterpreted and radical differences in comparison with anthroposophy are found. The article also reveals fruitful judgments about the essence of The Нistory and examines first of all the articles of Karen A. Swassjan who examines Bely’s history of culture as a personal history of the formation of consciousness — as material for a biography.
About the Authors
T. A. KoshemchukRussian Federation
Tatiana A. Koshemchuk — Doctor of Philology, Professor, Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages and Speech Culture
A. V. Bondarev
Russian Federation
Alexei V. Bondarev — PhD (Cultural Studies), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and History of culture
References
1. Ivanov-Razumnik, R. V. (2004) ‘Vershiny. Aleksandr Blok. Andrei Bely [Peaks. Aleksandr Blok. Andrei Bely]’, in Andrej Bely : pro et contra : licnost i tvorcestvo Andreja Belogo v ocenkah i tolkovanijah sovremennik- ov [Andrei Bely: pro et contra: the personality and work of Andrei Bely in the assessments and interpretations of his contemporaries]. Saint Petersburg: Russkogo hristinskogo gumanitarnogo instituta Publ., pp. 543–678. (In Russian)
2. Bely, A. (1999) Dusha samosoznaiushchaia [Self-Conscious Soul]. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ. (In Russian)
3. Swassjan, K. A. (2010) Filosofiia simvolicheskikh form E. Kassirera : kriticheskii analiz [Ernst Cassirer’s Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: A Critical Analysis]. 2nd edn. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, Ala Mater Publ. (In Russian).
4. Asoyan, J. and Malafeev, A. (2001) Otkrytie idei kul’tury. Opyt russkoi kul’turologii ser. XIX – nachala XX vv. [Open Ideas of Culture. The Experience of Russian Cultural Studies of Mid-20th-Early 21st Centuries]. Moscow: OGI Publ. (In Russian)
5. Bely, A. and Ivanov-Razumnik, R. V. (1998) Andrei Belyi i Ivanov-Razumnik perepiska [Letters]. Saint Pe- tersburg: Atheneum ; Feniks Publ. (In Russian)
6. Belous, V. G. (2011) ‘Istoriia stanovleniia samosoznaiushchei dushi Andreia Belogo: istoriko-filosofskie paralleli [The History of the Becoming of the Self-Conscious Soul by Andrei Bely: historical and philosophi- cal parallels]’, in Miry Andreia Belogo [The worlds of Andrey Bely]. Belgrad; Moscow: Filologicheskii fakulʹtet Belgradskogo universiteta Publ., pp. 610–617. (In Russian)
7. Kravchenko, O. (2017) ‘Comprehension of Cultural Crisis in the treatise The History of the Formation of Self-Conscious Soul by Andrej Bely’, Сulture in the Focus of Scientific Paradigms, (5), pp. 12–16. (In Russian)
8. Schmitt, A. (2018) ‘Andrei Bely’s experience of meditation as a key to his historiosophical conception of “self-conscious soul” ’, Literary Fact, (10), pp. 267–292. doi: 10.22455/2541-8297-2018-10-267-292. (In Rus- sian)
9. Bely, A. (1989) Na rubezhe dvukh stolety [At the Turn of Two Centuries]. Moscow: Khud. Lit. Publ. (In Rus- sian)
10. Silard, L. (2011) ‘Kul’turologicheskaia kontseptsiia Andreia Belogo v traktate Istoriia stanovleniia sa- mosoznaiushchei dushi [Cultural Conceptions of Andrei Bely in His Treatise The History of the Becoming of the Self-Conscious Soul]’, in Miry Andreia Belogo [The worlds of Andrey Bely]. Belgrad; Moscow: Filologich- eskii fakulʹtet Belgradskogo universiteta Publ., pp. 594–619. (In Russian)
11. Swassjan, K. A. (2006) ‘Vselennaia vo rtu [An Universe in Mouth]’, in Rastozhdestvleniia [Dissolutions]. Moscow: Evidentis, pp. 387–404. (In Russian)
12. Stahl, H. (2011) ‘Spiral’ ili ritmicheskii zhest istorii: risunok k «Istorii stanovleniia samosoznaiushchei dushi» Andreia Belogo [A Spiral or a Rhytmical Gesture of History: Drawing “The History of the Becoming of the Self-Conscious Soul” by Andrei Bely]’, in Miry Andreia Belogo [The worlds of Andrey Bely]. Belgrad; Moscow: Filologicheskii fakulʹtet Belgradskogo universiteta Publ., pp. 618–637. (In Russian)
13. Stahl, H. (2011) ‘The genesis of the concept of the self-Consciousness Soul and Andrei Belyi’s Is- toriia stanovleniia samosoznaiushchei dushi’, Russian Literature, 70(1–2), pp. 21–37. doi: 10.1016/j.rus- lit.2011.10.003. (In Russian)
14. Spivak, M. L. (2018) ‘«Pis’mo, napisannoe v serdtsakh nashikh»: Rudol’f Shteiner — Andrei Bely — apos- tol Pavel [You Yourselves are Our Letter, Written on Our Hearts: Rudolf Steiner — Andrei Bely — Saint Paul]’, in Novozavetnye obrazy i sjuzety v kulture russkogo modernizma [New Testament Images and Plots in the Culture of Russian Modernism]. Moscow: Indrik Publ, pp. 385–389. (In Russian)
15. Bely, A. (1994) Simvolizm kak miroponimanie [Symbolism as World Perception]. Moscow: Respublika. (In Russian)
16. Swassjan, K. A. (2013) No eshche noch [But still the night]. Moscow: Evidentis Publ. (In Russian)
17. Odesskii, M., Spivak, M. and Stahl, H. (2020) ‘«Ona — dolzhna byt’» «Istoriia stanovleniia samosoznaiush- chei dushi» Andreia Belogo [“It Must Exist” “The History of the Becoming of the Self-Conscious Soul” by An- drei Bely]’, in History of the formation of a self-conscious soul. Moscow: IMLI RAN Publ., pp. 5–83. (In Russian)
18. Stahl, H. (2020) ‘Parsifal’ na puti k samodukhu [Parsifal on His Way to a Self-Soul]’, in Simvolizm i poetika prostranstva v tvorchestve Andreia Belogo : sbornik statei [Symbolism and poetics of space in the work of An- drei Bely]. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija Publ., pp. 282–309. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Koshemchuk T.A., Bondarev A.V. The History of the Becoming of the Self-Conscious Soul as the Culminating. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2021;5(1):8-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2021-1-17-8-24