Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

Life and Death Ethoses in the Short Story The Mystery of Foreseen Death by Aleksandr Grin: Imaginative Apophatic Reality

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2021-1-17-25-33

Abstract

The paper is dedicated to the issue of the apophatic component of artistic culture associated with Thanatos that is developed in the literature oeuvre of Aleksandr Grin. Setting Grin’s short story The Mystery of Foreseen Death as the research object, this texts seeks to provide insight into the image of death and the examination of its spiritual and material manifestations that reflected the logocentric approach that was then popular among the Russian thinkers. To pursue this aim, the methodology of this study should allow identifying the ontological perspective of Grin’s story. Thus, the methodological foundations embrace the onto-hermeneutic approach to the analysis of literary work. In revealing the ontological dimension of the story much attention is paid to the ethos of life and death, the protagonist’s artistic imaginative experience of reality. In the story under study death is ambivalent: it is bodily, anthropological, as indicated by the repetitive image of neck on the execution block. At the same time, it is apophatic, as indicated by the darkened end of the story, the bewilderment of skeptical scientists that arose because of the main event of the story, namely the protagonist’s execution. In this regard, it appears to be effective to consider the anthroposophical thought of Rudolf Steiner that was absorbed by a large part of Russian intelligentsia at the beginning of the 20th century. This doctrine stresses the reflections on a person’s experience of death in reality. The imaginative aspect of anthroposophism was developed by Grin’s close friend, a neighbor in Crimean Cimmeria, Maximilian Voloshin, a disciple of the teachings of Steiner. The conclusions that can be drawn from the study are as follows: Grin’s story presents a detailed imaginative death experience, which makes it possible to raise the issue of it being part of the broader anthroposophical teaching. The Mystery of Foreseen Death indirectly expresses the Steinerian ideas and at the same time it fits into the framework of the Russian apophatic artistic tradition. The article also raises the issue of the apophatic component of Russian artistic culture, the thanatological experience of which can help in overcoming crisis situations nowadays. The findings of the research, in this way, can have an effect on better understanding in several fields: in literature studies (philology), in the history of Russian literature, in cultural studies and in philosophy.

About the Authors

M. A. Dudareva
Shuya Branch of Ivanovo State University, Shuya, Russia Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Marianna A. Dudareva — Doctorate Student, Senior lecturer, Russian language department No. 2, Faculty of Russian Language and General Educational Disciplines



N. Z. Koltsova
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Natalia Z. Koltsova — PhD (Philology), Associate Professor



References

1. Marion, J.-L. (1996) La croisée du visible. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Russ. ed.: Marion, J.-L. (2010) Perekrest’ja vidimogo. Moscow: Progress-Tradition.)

2. Braginskaya, N. V. and Shmaina-Velikanova, A. I. (2013) ‘Svet vechernij i svet nevechernij [Fading and Unfading Light]’, in Markov, A. V (ed.) Dva venka : posviashchenie Olʹge Sedakovoi. Moscow: Univ. Dmitrija Požarskogo Publ., pp. 73–92. (In Russian)

3. Engström, M. (2010) ‘Apophaticism and Jurodstvo in Contemporary Russian Literaturen Literature]’, Slovo : Journal of Slavic Languages and Literatures, 51, pp. 129–140. (In Russian)

4. Tatarinova, O. V. (2011) ‘Principles of apophatic poetics in works of A. I. Vvedensky’, Theory and Practice of Social Development, (7), pp. 357–359. (In Russian)

5. Elepova, M. Y. (2012) ‘V. A. Zhukovsky’s Aesthetics in the Apophatic Context’, Discussion, (4), pp. 176–178. (In Russian)

6. Isupov, K. G. (2018) ‘Hermeneutics of Mandelstam (“Conversation about Dante”)’, Review of the Christian Academy for the Humanities, 19(2), pp. 287–300. (In Russian)

7. Dudareva, M. A. (2019) ‘Apophatic elements in the poetry of S. A. Yesenin: Thanats’ characters’, Amazonia Investiga, 8(22), pp. 1–57.

8. Dudareva, M. A. (2020) ‘The Apophatics of the Russian Language and Culture in the Works of Nikolay Gumilyov (on the Example of the Poem “The Giraffe”)’, Nasledie Vekov, (1), pp. 98–104. doi: 10.36343/ SB.2020.21.1.009. (In Russian)

9. Grachev, V. I. (2019) ‘Cultures the phenomenon of apophatic “the Dialectics of myth” by A. F. Losev in the context topochron-axiogenic paradigm of culture’, Culture of Culture, (3), p. 10. Available at: http://cultcult.ru/cultures-the-phenomenon-of-apophatic-the-dialectics-of-myth-by-a-f-losev/ (Accessed: 14 March 2021). (In Russian)

10. Gurevich, P. and Spirova, E. (2019) ‘Science in the Apophatic Horizon’, Philosophical anthropology, 5(1), pp. 6–25. doi: 10.21146/2414-3715-2019-5-1-6-25. (In Russian)

11. Varava, V. V. (2013) ‘Filosofskaja tanatologija ili apofaticheskaja filosofija? [Philosophical thanatology or apophatic philosophy?]’, Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Filosofija. Sociologija. Pravo., (2), pp. 112–118. (In Russian)

12. Panchenko, A. M. and Smirnov, I. P. (1971) ‘Metaforicheskie arhetipy v russkoj srednevekovoj slovesnosti i v pojezii nachala ХХ veka [Metaphorical archetypes in Russian medieval literature and poetry of the early 20th century]’, Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoj literatury, 26, pp. 33–49. (In Russian)

13. Heidegger, M. (1947) Über den Humanismus. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. (Russ. ed.: Heidegger, M. (1993) ‘Pis’mo o gumanizme’, in Vremja i bytie : stat’i i vystuplenija. Moscow: Respublika Publ.)

14. Okeanskiy, V. P. (2011) ‘Ethos of life and death in Khomyakov and Schopenhauer’s works (culturological reflections to proof of comparison)’, Solovyov studies, (3), pp. 125–136. (In Russian)

15. Krzhizhanovskij, S. (1931) Pojetika zaglavij [Poetics of titles]. Moscow: Nikitinskie subbotniki Publ. (In Russian)

16. Dostoevsky, F. M. (1957) Idiot. Сollected works in 10 vol. Vol. 6. Moscow: Khud. Lit. Publ. (In Russian)

17. Grin, A. (1965) ‘Zagadka predvidennoj smerti [The Mystery of Foreseen Death]’, in Collected works : in 6 vol. Vol. 2. Moscow: Pravda Publ., pp. 444–450. (In Russian)

18. Steiner, R. (1918) ‘Die Metamorphosenlehre’, in Goethes Weltanschauung. Berlin: Philosophischantroposophischer Verlag, pp. 81–124. (Russ. ed.: Steiner, R. (2011) ‘Uchenie o metamorfoze’, in Mirovozzrenie Gete. Saint Petersburg: Demetra Publ., pp. 86–135.)

19. Mandelstam, O. E. (2009) Polnoe sobranie socinenij i pisem v 3 t. T. 1 : Stihotvorenija [Complete works and letters: in 3 vol. Vol. 1: Poems]. Moscow: Progress-Plejada Publ. (In Russian)

20. Masing-Delic, I. (1992) Abolishing Death: A Salvation Myth of Russian Twentieth-Century Literature. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Russ. ed.: Masing-Delic, I. (2020) Uprazdenie smerti : mif o spasenii v russkoj literature XX veka. Saint Petersburg: BiblioRossika Publ.; Boston: Academic Studies Press.)

21. Aries, P. (1977) L’Homme devant la mort. Paris: Seuil. (Russ. ed.: Aries, P. (1992) Chelovek pered litsom smerti. Moscow: Progress-Akademiia Publ.)

22. Palacheva, V. V. (2005) ‘Svetoteni Ruanskogo sobora (na materiale cikla stihotvorenij M. A. Voloshina Ruanskij sobor) [Chiaroscuro of the Rouen Cathedral (based on the cycle of poems by M.A. Voloshin Rouen Cathedral)]’, Kul’tura i tekst, (9), pp. 60–67. (In Russian)

23. Pinaev, S. M. (2009) Blizkij vsem, vsemu cuzoj ... : Maksimilian Volosin v istoriko-kulturnom kontekste serebrjanogo veka[Close to everyone, alien to everything: Maximilian Voloshin in the historical and cultural context of the Silver Age]. Moscow: Rossijskij universitet druzby narodov Publ. (In Russian)

24. Steiner, R. (1987) Entsprechungen zwischen Mikrokosmos und Makrokosmos : der Mensch-eine Hieroglyphe des Weltenalls. Dornach: Rudolf Steiner Verlag. (Russ. ed.: Steiner, R. (2019) Chelovek — ieroglif vselennoj: Sootvetstvija mezhdu mikrokosmom i makrokosmom. Moscow: Enigma Publ.)

25. Voloshin, M. A. (2003) Sobranie socinenij Tom 1, Tom 1 [Collected Works. T. 1. Poems 1899 1926]. Moscow: Ellis Lak 2000 Publ. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Dudareva M.A., Koltsova N.Z. Life and Death Ethoses in the Short Story The Mystery of Foreseen Death by Aleksandr Grin: Imaginative Apophatic Reality. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2021;5(1):25-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2021-1-17-25-33

Views: 627


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)