Typical Bourgeois Intellectuals and Great Friends of the Soviet Union: Latin American Writers in the USSR during the Khrushchev Thaw

The author studies the Latin American writers’ visits to the USSR from 1954 till beginning of 1960s realized via the Foreign Commission of the Union of Soviet Writers. After Stalin’s death, the activity of all departments of the Commission expanded significantly; the lists of those invited from abroad now included writers who were absolutely loyal to the USSR as well as new and yet unknown names. As a result, the staff of the Foreign Commission had to face an unprecedented pluralism. Based on the Commission’s Spanish and Portuguese translators’ reports, stored in the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art, the study analyses the criteria based on which the stay of a guest was perceived as favorable or undesirable for continuing cooperation in order to improve the image of the USSR in foreign literary circles. The study also analyses somewhat of a loyalty marker, reflecting the guests’ perception of the results of the 20th Congress of the CPSU and the state of Soviet-Chinese relations as sensitive topics important for the political self-determination of communist writers. The study of these new sources allows us to conclude that when choosing new foreign partners, the Foreign Commission often relied on the advice of its’ faithful friends, and the protégés of the latter did not always withstand the test of compatibility with the Soviet regime. At the same time, there was no specific criteria for the new friends’ selection. The translators, who were the first to report on the visit, were invited from outside, sometimes just for one particular job; they did not receive clear instructions from the Commission and were guided by their own ideas about the importance of the writer in their care and the expediency of cooperation with him. Later their opinion could not be taken into account; presumably, it was the journalistic and novelistic production of the invited writers published as a result of the visit to the USSR that was of greater importance to decide whether they were worth further attention. The study reviews Soviet Writers’ Union cooperation with P. Neruda, F. González-Urízar, N. Parra, V. Teitelboim, A. Cassigoli, F. Coloane (Chile), J. Amado, M. Rebelo, E. de Moraes, G. Figueiredo, H. Silveira (Brazil), I. Abirad, J.C. Pedemonte, M. Rosencof (Uruguay), N. Guillen, C. Leante, O. Hurtado, Samuel Feijoo (Cuba), E. Barrios Villa (Bolivia), C.A. Leon (Venezuela).

1. Dokuchaeva, S. and Nikonova, O. (2018) ‘The institutional structure and the target audiences of the ussr’s culture diplomacy in the countries of Latin America in 1950–1960-s’, Bulletin of the South Ural State University Series «Social Sciences and the Humanities», 18(1), pp. 14–17. doi: 10.14529/ssh180102. (InRussian).

2. Nagornaya, O. S. (2018) ‘Ot mirovoy revolyutsii k imperii mira? Stalinskie premii mira v kontekste poslevoennykh reprezentatsiy SSSR [From a world revolution to an empire of peace? Stalin Peace Prizes in the context of post-war representations of the USSR]’, in Uroki Oktjabrja i praktiki sovetskoj sistemy, 1920–1950-e gody [Lessons from October and the practice of the Soviet system. 1920–1950s: Conference Proceedings]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., pp. 341–349. (In Russian).

3. Popov, A. D. and Tregubov, N. A. (2017) ‘Sovetskaya kul’turnaya diplomatiya v 1956–1967 gg.: impul’s i dinamika «kul’turnogo nastupleniya» [Soviet cultural diplomacy in 1956-1967: the impulse and dynamics of the “cultural offensive”],’ in Sovetskaya kul’turnaya diplomatiya v gody Kholodnoy voyny (1945–1989) [Soviet cultural diplomacy during the Cold War (1945-1989): collection of documents]. Chelyabinsk: Južno-Uralʹskij gosudarstvennyj universitet Publ., pp. 69–76. (In Russian).

4. Nagornaya, O. S. (ed.) (2017) Sovetskaya kul’turnaya diplomatiya v gody Kholodnoy voyny (1945–1989) [Soviet cultural diplomacy during the Cold War (1945-1989): collection of documents]. Chelyabinsk: JužnoUralʹskij gosudarstvennyj universitet Publ. (In Russian).

5. David-Fox, M. (2011) Showcasing the Great Experiment Cultural Diplomacy and Western Visitors to the Soviet Union, 1921-1941. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794577.001.0001.

6. Gilburd, E. (2012) ‘The Revival of Soviet Internationalism in the 1950s’, in The thaw : Soviet society and culture during the 1950s and 1960s. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 262–401.

7. Gould-Davies, N. (2003) ‘The Logic of Soviet Cultural Diplomacy’, Diplomatic History, 27(2), pp. 193–214. doi: 10.1111/1467-7709.00347.

8. Romanova, R. (1993) ‘Soyuz pisateley SSSR pered svoim vtorym s»ezdom [USSR Writers’ Union before its second congress]’, Voprosy literatury, (3), pp. 219–230. (In Russian).

9. Vaissié, C. (2017) ‘The union of soviet writers (1934-1991). A means for a goal and a model for all the creative unions in the soviet bloc | L’Union des écrivains soviétiques (1934-1991) Un moyen pour une fin et le modèle de toutes les unions créatrices du bloc soviétique’, Studia Politica, 17(1), pp. 37–56.

10. V’iugin, V. I., Nechaeva, M. N. and Rozhentseva, E. A. (2018) Vtoroy Vsesoyuznyy sezd sovetskikh pisateley. Ideologiya istoricheskogo perekhoda i transformatsiya sovetskoy literatury. 1954 [Second All-Union Congress of Soviet Writers. The ideology of the historical transition and the transformation of Soviet litera. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiia Publ. (In Russian).

11. V’iugin, V. I. (2020) ‘Conceived by Stalin — Implemented by Khrushchev (More on the Second Congress of the Soviet Writers), Russkaya literatura, 3, pp. 232–241. doi: 10.31860/0131-6095-2020-3-232-241. (In Russian).

12. Kormilov, S. I. (2010) ‘The Soviet Writers Second Congress as a Doorway to the Thaw’, Moscow University Philology Bulletin, (4), pp. 48–65. (In Russian).

13. Popov, A. D. (2017a) ‘See. Understand. Fall in Love: The Soviet Foreign Tourism and Public Diplomacy during the Cold War’, Modern History of Russia, 7(4), pp. 148–160. doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu24.2017.411. (In Russian).

14. Popov, A. (2017b) ‘Lost in translation’, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie/ New Literary Observer, 143(1). pp. 54–65. (In Russian).

15. Tregubov, N. A. (2016) ‘The State Committee for Cultural Relations with Foreign Countries as the Department of Soviet Cultural Diplomacy (1957-1967)’, Upravlenie v sovremennyh sistemah, (4), pp. 61–67.

16. Alburquerque, G. (2011) La trinchera letrada : intelectuales latinoamericanos y guerra fría. Santiago de Chile: Ariadna ediciones.

17. Hollander, P. (1990) Political pilgrims : travels of Western intellectuals to the Soviet Union, China, and Cuba 1928-1978. Lanham: University Press of America.

18. Mondello, E. (2018) ‘Russia in Italo Calvino’s and Alberto Moravia’s Travel Notes’, Imagologiya i komparativistika, (10), pp. 172–182. doi: 10.17223/24099554/10/9. (In Russian).

19. Pedemonte, R. (2015) ‘Pablo Neruda, su tiempo y el «sentido de la historia»: postura ideológica y creación poética durante la Guerra Fría’, Ayer, (2), pp. 159–185.

20. Rupprecht, T. (2015) Soviet Internationalism after Stalin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316212769.

21. Astrada, C. et al. (2007) Hacia la revolución : viajeros argentinos de izquierda. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

22. Stern, L. (2006) Western Intellectuals and the Soviet Union, 1920-40. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203008140.

23. Zourek, M. (2017) ‘Los viajes de los intelectuales latinoamericanos a Europa Oriental 1947–1956: organización, circuitos de contacto y reflexiones’, Ars & Humanitas, 11(2), pp. 331–347. doi: 10.4312/ars.11.2.331-347.

24. Zourek, M. (2019) Praga y los intelectuales latinoamericanos (1947-1959). Rosario: Prohistoria Ediciones. Darmaros, M. F. (2018) ‘Jorge Amado and the Soviet Union. Notes on the Topic’, Literature of the Americas, (5), pp. 230–282. doi: 10.22455/2541-7894-2018-5-230-282. (In Russian).

25. Savin, V. M. (2001) ‘The New World’s Conquest and the International Relations’, Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta družby narodov, (1), pp. 109–120. (In Russian).

26. Tregubov, N. A. (2017) ‘Soviet Agitational Impact on the Target Audience in Socialist, Developing and Capitalist Countries (Second Half of the 1940S – Mid of the 1960s)’, Upravlenie v sovremennyh sistemah, (4), pp. 22–31. (In Russian).

27. Chuprinin, S. (2020) Ottepel’: sobytiya. Mart 1953 – avgust 1968 goda [Thaw: Events. March 1953 – August 1968]. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ. (In Russian).

28. Eggeling, W. (1994) Die sowjetische Literaturpolitik zwischen 1953 und 1970 zwischen Entdogmatisierung und Kontinuität. Bochum: Brockmeyer. (Russ. ed.: (1999) Politika i kulʹtura pri Hruŝeve i Brežneve 1953-1970 gg. Moscow: AIRO-XX.) (In Russian).

29. Yurchak, A. (2014) Eto bylo navsegda, poka ne koncilos’ : poslednee sovetskoe pokolenie [Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation]. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ. (In Russian).

30. Rebêlo, M. (1956) Cortina de ferro. São paulo: Martins.

31. Golubev, A. (2018) ‘Zapadnyy nablyudatel’ i zapadnyy vzglyad v affektivnom menedzhmente sovetskoy subektivnosti [The Western Observer and the Western Gaze in the Affective. Management of Soviet Subjectivity]’, in Posle Stalina: pozdnesovetskaya sub»ektivnost’ (1953–1985): Saint Petersburg: Izdatelʹstvo Evropeĭskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge Publ., pp. 219–253. (In Russian).

32. Galenovic, J. M. (2011) Kitajskie pomniki po KPSS i SSSR [Chinese commemoration for the CPSU and the USSR]. Moscow: Vostocnaja Kniga Publ. (In Russian).