Digital Diplomacy in Russian-European Relations: Cross-Cultural Aspects

The development of information and communication technologies and formation of the global information society actualizes the study of new directions in the evolution of diplomatic practice in the digital environment, including in the context of intercultural communication. The modern information revolution is characterized by the widespread and ever-growing use of social networks, blogs, wiki resources and other media platforms (labelled under the common term of Web 2.0 technologies). At the same time, the widespread use of Web 2.0 technologies and the increasing amount of time people all over the world spend there has a wide and profound impact on political and intercultural communication and diplomatic practice. A new phenomenon of digital diplomacy is gaining prominence among foreign policy tools of states and international organizations. Digital diplomacy can be defined as the use of social networks and Web 2.0 technologies in public diplomacy and international interaction by states and international organizations to achieve foreign policy goals and reach foreign audiences. According to the traditional view of digital diplomacy, which has developed in the academic literature, and is reflected in the works of authors such as M. Castells and J. Nye, it helps to strengthen network ties at the level of civil societies in different countries and thus reduces international conflicts. However, cultural differences and digital polarization can impede the potential of digital diplomacy. Today, almost all states and international organizations in the global arena are involved in the practice of digital diplomacy, and Russia is no exception. Russia actively participates in the digital diplomacy practice, by using social media and Web 2.0 tools as soft power instruments to introduce and explain foreign policy initiatives and reach foreign and domestic audiences, as stated in the Doctrine of the Information Security of Russian Federation of 2016. For Russia's foreign policy, relations with the EU countries and EU institutions are of particular importance, including in the digital sphere. However, even though both Russia and the EU countries make extensive use of digital diplomacy tools, the practice of horizontal network interaction mediated by digital technologies does not contribute to strengthening trust between countries and reducing conflicts. The authors consider incidents and allegations in the sphere of digital interaction and, based on the theory of digital polarization, conclude that the use of digital tools in horizontal interactions within digital diplomacy exacerbates intercultural differences between countries and increases conflict instead of improving mutual understanding.

1. Alborova, M. B. (2019) ‘City Diplomacy as an Important Factor of the Development of Modern International Relations in a Digital Civilization’, International journal of humanities and natural sciences, (8–1), pp. 136–139. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-1000-2019-11473

2. Bjola, C. and Zaiotti, R. (2020) Digital Diplomacy and International Organisations. Edited by C. Bjola and R. Zaiotti. Abingdon; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003032724

3. Boyd, A. et al. (2019) ‘Data Diplomacy’, Science & Diplomacy, 8(1). Available at: http://sciencediplomacy.org/article/2019/data-diplomacy

4. Castells, M. (2014) ‘The Impact of the Internet on Society: A Global Perspective’, in Change: 19 Key Essays on How the Internet Is Changing Our Lives. [Madrid]: Turner, pp. 127–148.

5. Feezell, J. T. (2018) ‘Agenda Setting through Social Media: The Importance of Incidental News Exposure and Social Filtering in the Digital Era’, Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), pp. 482–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917744895

6. Foglesong, D. S. (2020) ‘When the Russians really were coming: citizen diplomacy and the end of Cold War enmity in America’, Cold War History, 20(4), pp. 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2020.1735368

7. Hong, S. and Kim, S. H. (2016) ‘Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments’, Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), pp. 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007

8. Kharkevich, M. V. (2014) ‘Soft Power: Political Use of a Scientific Concept’, MGIMO Review of International Relations, (2), pp. 22–29. (In Russian).

9. Lebedeva, M. M. (ed.) (2017) Publichnaya diplomatiya: teoriya i praktika [Public diplomacy: theory and practice]. Moscow: Aspekt press Publ. (In Russian).

10. Lebedeva, M. M. (2018) ‘Potentsial rossiyskoy publichnoy diplomatii [The potential of Russian public diplomacy]’, in Transformatsiya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy v XXI veke: vyzovy i perspektivy [Transformation of international relations in the 21th century: challenges and prospects: conference proceedings]. Moscow, pp. 102–104. (In Russian).

11. Lebedeva, M. M. and Nikitina, Y. A. (eds) (2020) Mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost’: Global’nyye i regional’nyye aktory [International Security: Global and Regional Actors]. Moscow: Aspekt press Publ. (In Russian).

12. Lebedeva, O. V. (2021) ‘Rol’ sotsial’nykh setey v diplomaticheskoy praktike Rossii [The Role of Social Networks in Russian Diplomatic Practice]’, International Affairs, (3), pp. 20–27. (In Russian).

13. Manor, I. (2019) The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04405-3

14. Nye, J. S. (2010) Cyber power. Cambridge: Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.

15. Podberezkin, A. I. (2016) ‘Military Force and the Policy of the New Public Diplomacy’, Observer, (12), pp. 15–25. (In Russian).

16. Tsvetkova, N. A. and Kuznetsov, N. M. (2020) ‘Phenomenon of Big Data Diplomacy in World Politics’, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Political Sciences. History. International Relations, (4), pp. 27–44. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2020-4-27-44

17. Tsygankov, P. A. (2015) ‘Gibridnyye voyny: ponyatiye, interpretatsii i real’nost’ [Hybrid Wars: Concept, Interpretations and Reality]’, in Gibridnyye voyny v khaotiziruyushchemsya mire ХХI veka [Hybrid Wars in the Chaotized World of the 21st Century]. Moscow: MSU Publ., pp. 7–32. (In Russian).

18. Zinovieva, E. (2013) ‘U.S. Gigital Diplomacy: Opportunities and Threats to International Security’, Security Index, 19(1), pp. 213–228. (In Russian).