Intercultural Communication in Confessional Legal Relations (Common and Particular in Russia and Japan)

The study of particularities of regional cross-country images of confession and intercultural communication as well as the semantic image surrounding these concepts is vital in today’s social life. The article analyzes denotations and connotations of the terms confession and intercultural communication in the Russian and Japanese sociocultural contexts from the point of view of a new research discourse — glocal religious studies with the focus on vernacular specifics of religiosity in Russia and Japan. The case study methodology includes description and analysis of how various views on certain aspects of religiosity correlate. It makes possible to adjust the theoretical understanding of the problem and weigh it against the variety of real-life communicational practices. The article investigates the complexity and dramatism of communication between members of the ingroup and others. The study bases on the materials from the history, media and academic discourses where in the internal and external of particular communities in the given historic circumstances may not only vary significantly, but also be intentionally marked to divide one from the other. Sometimes this demarcation takes a form of stigmatization that label one’s perspective as not-true or lawless. The paper describes two major types of culture: the first one (ethnocentrism in terms suggested by M. Bennet) derives from the idea that other’s statements are sealed and cannot be translated thus must be destroyed. The second type — ethnorelativism — comes from the idea of affinity and openness. It is presumed that taking one a different perspective and accepting diversity is empowering and gives start to an intercultural dialogue. Common and particular are the two basic viewpoints on any identity, when both positive and negative promotes understanding. The phenomenon of unity as similarity of indistinguishable (like grains of sand) on the one hand, and systemic unity of the different (like people) on the other hand, are considered within the framework of distancing extralinguistic social facts from the term that stand for them. The latter shown as special imaginary unities and descriptions of autopoietic systems.

1. Alpatov, V. M., Amara, S. I. and Arakava, E. (2020) Japan XXI Nova [«Issues of Japanology №8]. Saint Petersburg: Art-xpress Publ. (In Russian).

2. Arinin, E. I., Markova, N. M. and Takahashi, S. (2020) ‘The Term “Religion” in the Context of the “Glocal” approach to Intercultural Communication in Russia and Japan’, Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, (4), pp. 164–177. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2019-4-12-164-177

3. Bykova, S. A. (2020) ‘Kul’tura narodov Rossii i Yaponii v posobii po ustnomu perevodu [The culture of the peoples of Russia and Japan in an interpretation manual]’, in Yaponskiy yazyk v vuze: aktual’nyye problemy prepodavaniya [Japanese at the University: Actual Problems of Teaching: Conference Proceedings]. Moscow: Kluch-S Publ., pp. 52–59. (In Russian).

4. Chugrov, S. V. (2015) ‘Soft Attraction of Japan’, Polis. Political Studies, (6), pp. 53–67. (In Russian). https:// doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.06.08

5. Ermakova, L. M. (2020) Kogda raskrylis` Nebo i Zemlja: Mif, ritual, poeziia rannei Iaponii. T. 1. Issledovanija [When Heaven and Earth Revealed: Myth, Ritual, Poetry of Early Japan. Vol. 1. Research]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

6. Fujiwara, S. (2005) ‘Survey on Religion and Higher Education in Japan’, Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 32(2), pp. 353–370. https://doi.org/10.18874/jjrs.32.2.2005.353-370

7. Gatling, B. (2020) ‘There isn’t belief, just believing: Rethinking belief as a keyword of folklore studies’, Journal of American Folklore, 133(529), pp. 307–328. https://doi.org/10.5406/jamerfolk.133.529.0307

8. Ginzburg, C. (1976) Il formaggio e i vermi: il cosmo di un mugnaio del ’500. Torino: Einaudi.

9. Illman, R. and Czimbalmos, M. (2020) ‘Knowing, being, and doing religion: Introducing an analytical model for researching vernacular religion’, Temenos, 56(2), p. 171. https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.97275

10. Iwano, M. (2018) ‘Intercultural Personality as a Goal of Higher Education: Relevance of the Program Go Global Japan» in Yamaguchi Prefectural University’, Âroslavskij pedagogičeskij vestnik, (5), pp. 392–398. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/1813-145X-2018-10190

11. Khristoforova, O. B. (2016) ‘Opoznat’ besa. Chast’ 1: Vernakulyarnyye teorii bolezney i metody simvolicheskogo lecheniya [Identify the demon. Part 1: Vernacular Theories of Disease and Methods of Symbolic Healing]’, in In Umbra: Demonology as a Semiotic System: Anthology № 5. Moscow: Indrik Publ, pp. 259–275. (In Russian).

12. Korobeynikova, L. A. (2018) ‘Globalization in the Context of Cultural Diversity’, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie, (30), pp. 73–80. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/30/8

13. Korobeynikova, L. A. and Vodopianova, E. V. (2019) ‘Hybrid Globalization: Ideas and Concepts’, Tomsk State University journal, (447), pp. 83–87. (In Russian).

14. Kuropjatnik, A. and Kuropjatnik, M. (2018) ‘Post-multiculturalism and Cultural Diversity in the Age of Globalization’, International Trends, 16(1), pp. 29–39. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2018.16.1.52.3

15. Mullins, M. R. (1998) Christianity Made in Japan: a Study of Indigenous Movements. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

16. Nakano, R. and Zhu, Y. (2020) ‘Heritage as soft power: Japan and China in international politics’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26(7), pp. 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1845322

17. Otmazgin, N. (2021) ‘An “East Asian” Public Diplomacy? Lessons from Japan, South Korea, and China’, Asian Perspective, 45(3), pp. 620–624. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2021.0029

18. Primiano, L. N. (1995) ‘Vernacular Religion and the Search for Method in Religious Folklife’, Western Folklore, 54(1), p. 37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1499910

19. Rodicheva, I. and Novikova, O. (2019) ‘The Philosophy of Zen Buddhism as a Development Factor for Self-Identification in Japanese Society’, Ideas and Ideals, 11(4–2), pp. 429–442. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2019-11.4.2-429-442

20. Sharkov, F. I. and Yakushina, O. I. (2019) ‘Conceptual Models of Intercultural Communication in Individual and Group Identities` Formation’, The monitoring of public opinion economic & social changes, (2), pp. 385–404. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.2.769

21. Simonia, N. A. and Torkunov, A. V. (2015) ‘New world order: from bipolarity to multipolarity’, Polis. Political Studies, (3), pp. 27–37. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.03.03

22. Sukhanova, N. (2013) Istorija Japonskoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi v XX veke [History of the Japanese Orthodox Church in the 20th century]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiia Publ. (In Russian).

23. Tamaki, T. (2019) ‘Repackaging national identity: Cool Japan and the resilience of Japanese identity narratives’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 27(1), pp. 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2019.1594323

24. Trubnikova, N. N. (2012) ‘Rassuzhdeniia o Iaponii kak “strane bogov” v XIII v [Reasoning about Japan as the “Land of the Gods” in the XIII century]’, Voprosy Filosofii, (8), pp. 85–94. (In Russian).

25. Winkler, S. C. (2019) ‘ “Soft power is such a benign animal”: narrative power and the reification of concepts in Japan’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(4), pp. 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1623171