The Exhibition Meet Them as a Tool for Shaping Historical Memory in Uruguay

Using the example of the exhibition Meet Them (Encontrarte con Ellos) at the J.M. Blanes Museum of Fine Arts (Montevideo, Uruguay), the article examines the process of reflection on the tragic events of national history, namely the crimes of the 1970s–1980s Uruguayan dictatorship. The research focuses on the question of whether the commemoration of painful experiences is able to consolidate societies by means of discussion and reflection. The process of the collective memory building within the Uruguayan society is considered on the example of the creative initiative of intellectuals undertaken within the framework of the exhibition. They created works, beyond specific genres and concepts, that told the stories of political dissidents who had been abducted and then disappeared. These works are based on real testimonies and designed not to let the history fade in silence. The data collection, which was mandatory for the artists participating in the project, is viewed as a significant and unique investigative feature that, while demanding additional effort from the artists, made the exhibition stand out. It appears as an elaborate sociocultural project that combines documentary evidence with visual images of the silent victims of political repression created by the artists, and the museum of affect in this case serves as a place of memory. Several pieces presented at the exhibition are considered from the point of view of symbolic and creative interpretation of memories and data gathered by the artists, as well as their impressions and sometimes personal stories and experiences intertwined with the story of a particular victim gone missing. However, the manipulative effect of collective memory as a phenomenon, which has historically been actively employed by certain political forces and leaders to increase popularity and gain support, is taken into account. The project is aimed at raising public awareness of the issues on which the artists elaborated through their work, so under certain conditions the exhibition can be conducive to the construction of national and local identities among Uruguayans. The concept of the exhibition favors the achievement of these objectives, but only over time will it be possible to evaluate the extent to which they have been met. At the same time, the reaction of some influential figures to this initiative, as well as significant steps taken by public institutions in order to provide support for commemorative initiatives have shown that a certain part of the Uruguayan elite is generally tilted toward the acceptance of such manifestations of civic engagement. 

1. Ariely, G. (2019) ‘National Days, National Identity, and Collective Memory: Exploring the Impact of Holocaust Day in Israel’, Political Psychology, 40(6), pp. 1391–1406. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12595

2. Belmonte, A. and Rochlitz, M. (2020) ‘Collective memories, propaganda and authoritarian political support’, Economic Systems, 44(3), p. 100771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100771

3. Bonami, Z. (2019) ‘Muzei v diskurse affekta [The museum in the discourse of affect]’, in Politika affekta: muzei kak prostranstvo publichnoi istorii [Political Affect: The Museum as a Space of Public History]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, pp. 51–78. (In Russian).

4. Choi, S. Y. et al. (2021) ‘National Identity Can be Comprised of More Than Pride: Evidence From Collective Memories of Americans and Germans’, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(1), pp. 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JARMAC.2020.09.004

5. Cremaschi, M. (2021) ‘Place is memory: A framework for placemaking in the case of the human rights memorials in Buenos Aires’, City, Culture and Society, 27, p. 100419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2021.100419

6. Dabaghyan, E. (2020) ‘Uruguay: lessons on democracy’, Latinskaia Amerika, (8), pp. 20–28. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044748X0010344-7

7. Ding, I., Slater, D. and Zengin, H. (2021) ‘Populism and the Past: Restoring, Retaining, and Redeeming the Nation’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 56(2), pp. 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09333-w

8. Emelyanova, T. P. (2019) Kollektivnaya pamyat’ o sobytiyakh Otechestvennoy istorii: sotsial’nopsikhologicheskiy podkhod [Collective memory of the events of Russian history: a socio-psychological approach]. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta psichologii RAN Publ. (In Russian).

9. Erll, A. (2009) ‘The “Indian Mutiny” as a Shared Site of Memory: A Media Culture Perspective on Britain and India’, in Memory, history and colonialism: engaging with Pierre Nora in colonial and postcolonial contexts. London: German Historical Institute London, pp. 117–148.

10. Feldman, J. P. (2021) Memories before the state postwar Peru and the place of memory, tolerance, and social inclusion. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. https://doi.org/10.36019/9781978809574

11. García Portilla, J. (2022) ‘b) Uruguay: Extreme Positive Case Study (Latin America)’, in ”Ye Shall Know Them by Their Fruits”: A Mixed Methods Study on Corruption, Competitiveness, and Christianity in Europe and the Americas. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-03078498-0_19

12. Glushchenko, G. Y. (2018) ‘Istoriya versus pamyat’: k probleme vzaimosvyazi istorii i pamyati [History versus memory: on the problem of the relationship between history and memory]’, Philosophical thought, (1), pp. 37–50. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2018.1.21578

13. Halbwachs, M. (1994) Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Paris: Albin Michel. (Russ.ed.: (2007) Sotsial’nyye ramki pamyati. Moscow: Novoe izd-vo Publ.).

14. Ivanov, N. (2019) ‘«Autogolpe» in Uruguay in 1973 and the Destiny of the Right-Wing Autohorian Regime of J.M. Boardaberry’, Latin American Historical Almanac, 24, pp. 139–160. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32608/2305-8773-2019-24-1-139-160

15. Martynov, B. (2020) ‘Latin American Populism: some relevant thoughts’, Latinskaia Amerika, (2), pp. 19–29. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044748X0008142-5

16. McSherry, J. P. (2019) ‘Operation Condor and Transnational State Violence against Exiles’, Journal of Global South Studies, 36(2), pp. 368–398. https://doi.org/10.1353/gss.2019.0042

17. Nora, P. (1984) Les Lieux de mémoire. T.1 La République. Paris: Gallimard. (Russ.ed.: (1999) ‘Problematika mest pamyati’, in Frantsiia-pamiat’. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, pp. 17-50.).

18. Romanovskaya, E. V. (2010) ‘Morris Halbwachs: Cultural Contexts of Memory’, Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 10(3), pp. 39–44. (In Russian).

19. Smith Jr., F. (2021) ‘On Time, (In)equality, and Death’, Michigan Law Review, (120.2), pp. 195-263. https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.120.2.time

20. Winter, J. (2010) ‘Sites of Memory’, in Memory: Histories, Theories, Debates. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 312–324. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_626982

21. Zerubavel, Y. (1995) Recovered roots: collective memory and the making of Israeli national tradition. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.

22. Zhukov, D. S. (2013) ‘Collective memory: key research problems and interpretation of the phenomenon’, Ineternum, (1), pp. 6–16. (In Russian).

23. Zirugo, D. (2021) ‘Audiences as Agents of Collective Memory — Implications for Press Criticism and Journalism Boundaries’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 65(2), pp. 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2021.1933984

24. Zubanova, L. B. (2019) ‘Mediumy pamyati v elitarno-gumanitarnom tipe mediadiskursa [Mediums of memory in the elite-humanitarian type of media discourse]’, in Voprosy literatury i zhurnalistiki v kontekste sokhraneniya gumanisticheskikh tsennostey [Questions of literature and journalism in the context of preserving humanistic values]. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University Publ., pp. 162–170. (In Russian).