The Xenology of the Powder Keg of Europe: the Reflection of the Peculiarities of Own — Alien Dichotomy in the Balkan Model of the World in the Xenopejorative Vocabulary of the Languages of the Balkan Sprachbund — Articulation of Issue
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-3-23-107-125
Abstract
The article discusses the reflection of the features of the own — alien dichotomy in the Balkan model of the world in the xenologic pejorative vocabulary of the Balkan sprachbund languages: Albanian, Aromanian, Bulgarian, Modern Greek, Macedonian, Romanian and Serbo-Croatian. The author gives a brief review of the historical, cultural and geopolitical specifics of the Balkan-Carpathian region, which influenced the local peoples’ ideas about strangers; some traditional mythological beliefs of the Balkanians related to the conceptual field of otherness are also presented. Based on the analysis of the internal history of the word, an attempt is made to define the main models for constructing derogatory names for strangers in order to compare the data for various Balkan languages and, to the extent possible, build an integral image of the concept of alien in the Balkan conceptual worldview. According to the results of the study, the xenopejorative vocabulary of languages of the Balkan sprachbund shows significant similarities both in terms of form and content. Pejoratives with undifferentiated evaluativity absolutely predominate, which could account for the richness of the Balkan derivational morphology and a large number of lexical borrowings in each of the languages; pejoratives with an indication of appearance, features of language and peculiarities of behavior are also widely represented, however, the first are referentially limited, while the second and the third are universal, from which it is concluded that the prototypical Balkan alien is someone who speaks differently and behaves differently. At the same time, the most common target for pejorative vocabulary in the Balkan languages among all strangers is Roma people, which is bound both to a number of stereotyped ideas about the physical and behavioral distinctive features of this ethnic group, and to the historical isolation caused by the nomadic way of life and the closedness of the Roma community from outsiders.
About the Author
E. V. Romanin
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evghenii Romanin — PhD-student of the Institute of Philosophy
7/9, Universitetskaya embankment, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 199034
References
1. Belyakov, S. S. (2010) ‘Serby — “chuzhak” No1 [Serbs – the alien No 1]’, Voprosy nacionalizma, (3), pp. 128–140. (In Russian).
2. Borisov, S. A. and Pilipenko, G. P. (2020) ‘Czech-Serbian-Romanian Language Contacts in Romanian Banat Based on a Field Research’, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, (459), pp. 15–26. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/459/2
3. Foucault, M. (1999) Les anormaux. Paris: Gallimard. (Russ. ed.: (2005) Nenormaljnye: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1974—1975 uchebnom godu. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ.).
4. Friedman, V. (2008) ‘Balkan Slavic dialectology and Balkan linguistics: Periphery as center’, in American contributions to the 14th International Congress of Slavists, Ohrid, September 2008. Vol. 1. Linguistics. Bloomington: Slavica, pp. 131–148.
5. Golant, N. (2012) ‘Obychai, obrjady i obraz zhizni evreev v zerkale rumynskih mifologicheskih predstavlenij [The Jews’ customs, rituals and way of life as reflected in Romanian mythological ideas]’, in «The Old» and «The New» in Slavic and Jewish Cultural Tradition. Moscow: Probel-2000 Publ., pp. 314–323. (In Russian).
6. Golant, N. (2013) ‘Biblejskie sjuzhety v rumynskom foljklore i mifologicheskie predstavlenija rumyn o evrejah [Biblical plots in the Romanian folklore and mythological ideas of the Romanians about the Jews].’, in Oral and Written in Slavic and Jewish Cultural Tradition. Moscow: Probel-2000 Publ., pp. 220–226. (In Russian).
7. Golant, N. (2016) ‘Mifologicheskie predstavlenija rumyn Oltenii i Muntenii (po materialam ekspedicij v vylchu, Gorzh, Mehedinc’ i Buzeu [Mythological ideas of the Romanians of Oltenia and Muntenia (a case study of the expedition to Vâlcea, Gorj, Mehedinţi and Buzău)]’, Acta linguistica petropolitana, 12(3), pp. 27–40. (In Russian)
8. Kirchanov, M. V. (2016) ‘Imagining Romania spatially and bodily: «national locus» and «national body» as inventing traditions of Romanian identity in the second half of the 19th century’, Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana, 20(2), pp. 169–192. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu19.2016.211
9. Kirchanov, M. V. (2021) ‘“Culture of unknowledge” as a form of historical imagination and political culture of Russian and Bulgarian nationalism’, Bulletin of Udmurt University. Sociology. Political science. International relations, 5(3), pp. 357–366. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.35634/2587-9030-2021-5-3-357- 366
10. Koloskov, E. A. (2011) ‘Macedonian-Greek polemics on the name: aspects, stages and search for a solution’, Slavânskij alʹmanah (Moskva), 2010, pp. 186–203. (In Russian).
11. Lamash, M. V (2021) ‘The Balkan Peninsula: features of geopolitical and interethnic processes’, Russian Political Science, (1), pp. 90–99. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.51180/RPS.2021.18.1.007
12. Lesnichkova, L. (2017) ‘The Notion of the Foreign in Hungarian and Bulgarian Phraseologisms’, Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 9(2), pp. 27–36. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.1515/ausp-2017-0015
13. Lindstedt, J. (2000) ‘Linguistic Balkanization: Contact-induced change by mutual reinforcement’, in Languages in Contact. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics. Amsterdam; Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, pp. 231–246. http://doi.org/10.2307/40997168
14. Luchkanyn, S. (2014) ‘Historico-linguistic disputes about latin danube and the continuity of the roman element in ethno- and glottogenesis of Romania’, Scientifi c Notes of Taurida V. I. Vernadsky National University. – Series: Philology. Social communications, 27(1–1), pp. 20–24. (In Russian).
15. Lysenko, V. G. (2009) ‘Knowledge of Another’s as the Way of Self-Knowledge’, Voprosy Filosofii, (11), pp. 61–77. (In Russian).
16. Parastatov, S. V (2010) ‘“The Macedonian Question” in the Context of Modern Geopolitical Process in Balkans’, Pravovaâ politika i pravovaâ žiznʹ, (1), pp. 128–133. (In Russian).
17. Plotnikova, A. A. (2009) Materialy dlja etnolingvisticheskogo izuchenija balkanoslavjanskogo areala [Materials for the ethnolinguistic study of Balkanoslavic area]. Moscow: Institut slavjanovedenija Publ. (In Russian).
18. Potebnya, A. A. (1989) Slovo I mif [Word and myth]. Moscow: Pravda Publ. (In Russian). Romanova, A. P. (2015) ‘А Monster image ambivalency in the contemporary culture “Own-Alien” dichotomy’, Eurasian Union of Scientists, (10–3), pp. 52–54. (In Russian).
19. Sedakova, I. A. (2014) ‘Balkanisms and Turkisms: new approaches to the problem’, Slavânskij alʹmanah (Moskva), 2013, pp. 553–562. (In Russian).
20. Sobolev, A. N. (2013) Osnovy lingvokuljturnoj antropogeografii Balkanskogo poluostrova [The foundations of linguocultural anthropogeography of the Balkan Peninsula]. Moscow ; München: Nauka Publ.; Verlag Otto Sagner. (In Russian).
21. Stoyanova, N. I. (2007) ‘Turcizmy vo frazeologizmah bolgarskogo jazyka [Turkisms in the phraseological units of the Bulgarian language]’, Herald of Daghestan State University, (6), pp. 102–107. (In Russian).
22. Trefilova, O. V. (2020) ‘Bulgarian Folk Demonology: A Brief Overview’, Slavic World in the Third Millennium, 15(3–4), pp. 160–181. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31168/2412-6446.2020.15.3-4.11
23. Tsivyan, T. V (1999) Movement and path in the Balkan world model. Moscow: Indrik Publ. (In Russian). Tsivyan, T. V (2006) Modelj mira i ejo lingvisticheskie osnovy [Model of the world and its linguistic foundations]. Moscow: URSS Publ. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Romanin E.V. The Xenology of the Powder Keg of Europe: the Reflection of the Peculiarities of Own — Alien Dichotomy in the Balkan Model of the World in the Xenopejorative Vocabulary of the Languages of the Balkan Sprachbund — Articulation of Issue. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2022;6(3):107-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-3-23-107-125
Views:
350
Email this article 