Science Fiction Series Star Trek and Babylon 5 as Forms of Political and Memorial Cultures Construction

The author analyzes Star Trek and Babylon 5 series as segments of American political culture and collective memory. The purpose of the article is to analyze how American popular culture, represented by the TV series, actualizes and visualizes the problems of the admissibility / inadmissibility of external influence / non-influence of more developed societies on less developed ones and demonstrates the features of collective memory developments. The author studies the assimilation of the political in the visual discourses of mass culture. Methodologically, the article is based on the principles proposed in the memorial turn and the analysis of the politics of memory within the paradigm of intellectual history. The novelty of the study lies in the analysis of common and unique features and directions of assimilation of the political, reduced to the problems of interference / nonintervention, in modern mass culture and historical memory. The article considers 1) the modes of actualization of political and social differences between societies in Star Trek and Babylon 5 TV series; 2) the political and ideological dimensions of intervention through the prism of mass culture and aspects of the functioning of various memorial cultures; 3) the problems of memory as the trauma received during the forced interaction of imagined societies with different identities in the contexts of the development of collective memories and the uncomfortable past revision through the formation of a compromise memorial canon. The article shows the contribution of the series as elements of mass cultural discourse to the development of Western political culture and of Selfness and Otherness concepts, and indicates their role in the revision of the past in popular culture. The results of the study suggest that the assimilation of the political in mass cultural discourse became both an incentive for ideological modifications and transformations of modern society, and a form of promoting the principles of political correctness and tolerance as its systemic characteristics. Moreover, it can be viewed as an attempt to revise the memorial canon and to enhance it by alternative visions of history, based on the revitalization of marginalized collective memories.

1. Abbott, S. (2010) The Cult TV Book: From Star Trek to Dexter, New Approaches to TV Outside the Box. New York: Soft Skull Press.

2. Almeida, J. M. de (2002) ‘International Political Theory and the Issue of Legitimate Intervention’, Nação e defesa, (2), pp. 155–170.

3. Assmann, A. (2010) ‘From Collective Violence to a Common Future: Four Models for Dealing with a Traumatic Past’, in Conflict, memory transfers and the reshaping of Europe. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publ., pp. 8–23.

4. Barber, J. (2017) ‘Star Trek and the anthropological machine: Eliding difference to stay human’, Geo- graphical Bulletin - Gamma Theta Upsilon, 58(1), pp. 40–50.

5. Britton, D. F. (1997) ‘Public History and Public Memory’, The Public Historian, 19(3), pp. 11–23. https:// doi.org/10.2307/3379553

6. Buzan, B. (2010) ‘America in Space: The International Relations of Star Trek and Battlestar Galactica’, Mil- lennium: Journal of International Studies, 39(1), pp. 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810371016

7. Chavkin, D. and McGuire, B. (2021) Star Trek: Designing the Final Frontier: How Midcentury Modernism Shaped Our View of the Future. San Rafael: Weldon Owen.

8. Cogan, B. (2011) Deconstructing South Park: Critical Examinations of Animated Transgression. Lanham: Lexington Books Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

9. Davidson, F. M. (2017) ‘Owning the future: Manifest destiny and the vision of American hegemony in Star Trek’, Geographical Bulletin - Gamma Theta Upsilon, 58(1), pp. 8–18.

10. Delasara, J. (2000) PopLit, PopCult, and the X-Files: Critical Exploration. Jefferson: McFarland.

11. Disch, T. M. (2000) The Dreams Our Stuff Is Made Of: How Science Fiction Conquered the World. New York: Touchstone.

12. Dittmer, J. (2010) Popular Culture, Geopolitics and Identity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

13. Dittmer, J. and Dodds, K. (2008) ‘Popular Geopolitics Past and Future: Fandom, Identities and Audiences’, Geopolitics, 13(3), pp. 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040802203687

14. Dyson, S. B. (2015) Otherworldly Politics: the International Relations of Star Trek, Game of Thrones, and Battlestar Galactica. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

15. Fewster, D. (2006) Visions of past glory: nationalism and the construction of early Finnish history. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.

16. Geraghty, L. (2007) Living with Star Trek: American culture and the Star Trek universe. London; New York: Tauris.

17. Gonzalez, G. A. (2015) The Politics of Star Trek: Justice, War, and the Future. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137546326

18. Gonzalez, G. A. (2018) Star Trek and the Politics of Globalism. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95411-0

19. Gonzalez, G. A. (2020) Popular Culture, Conspiracy Theory, and the Star Trek Text. Lanham: Lexington Books.

20. Grainge, P. (2018) Memory and popular film, Memory and popular film. Manchester: Manchester Univer- sity Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137531

21. Gunderman, H. C. (2017) ‘Blurring the protagonist/antagonist binary through a geopolitics of peace: Star Trek’s Cardassians, antagonists of the alpha quadrant’, Geographical Bulletin - Gamma Theta Upsilon, 58(1), pp. 51–62.

22. Halbwachs, M. (1925) Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Paris: Félix Alcan.

23. Hall, R. A. (2021) Robots in Popular Culture: Androids and Cyborgs in the American Imagination. Santa

24. Hanovs, D. and Tēraudkalns, V. (2012) Laiks, telpa, vadonis: autoritarisma kultura Latvija, 1934-1940. Riga: Zinatne Publ.

25. Heraclides, A. and Dialla, A. (2015) ‘Intervention and non-intervention in international political theory’, in Humanitarian Intervention in the Long Nineteenth Century: Setting the Precedent. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 81–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1mf71b8.9 Barbara: ABC-CLIO, LLC.

26. Kück, R. (2020) Star Trek: Politics: The Political culture of a Sci-Fi Series. Independently published. Kukkonen, K. (2008) ‘Popular Cultural Memory: Comics, Communities and Context Knowledge’, Nordi-

27. com Review, 29(2), pp. 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0190

28. Kyrchanoff, M. W. (2018) ‘Historical grand narratives of the Seven Kingdoms of Westeros: from invention to deconstruction of a traditional Medieval historiography’, Journal of Frontier Studies, (1), pp. 17–46. https:// doi.org/10.24411/2500-0225-2018-00002

29. Kyrchanoff, M. W. (2020) ‘Inventing Nostalgia for the “Golden Age” of the National Middle Ages and Fear of the Future’, Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 2(4), pp. 112–151. https://doi.org/10.46539/ gmd.v2i4.106

30. Kyrchanoff, M. W. (2021a) ‘SciFi Cinema as one of Spatial Localizations of Military Images in American Mass Culture’, Humanitarian Vector, 16(5), pp. 77–86. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853- 2021-16-5-77-86

31. Kyrchanoff, M. W. (2021b) ‘When nations remember: what, where and how. Notes by a cultural anthro- pologist on the margins of a book by James Wertsch “How Nations Remember: A Narrative Approach”’, Istoričeskaâ èkspertiza, (3), pp. 54–67. (In Russian).

32. MacCabe, C. (1986) High theory/low culture : analysing popular television and film. Manchester: Man- chester Univ. Press.

33. Nora, P. (2010) Rethinking France. Volume 4, Histories and Memories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

34. Pence, J. (2018) ‘Postcinema/Postmemory’, in Memory and popular film. Manchester: Manchester Univer- sity Press, pp. 237–256. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137531.00020

35. Rhodes, M. A. (2017) ‘Alternative pasts, presents, and futures in Star Trek: Historical engagement and representation through popular culture’, Geographical Bulletin - Gamma Theta Upsilon, 58(1), pp. 29–39.

36. Sakwa, R. (2021) ‘The Cultural Revolution of the West and World Politics’, Rossiya v globalnoi politike, 19(5), pp. 86–90. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6439-2021-19-5-86-90

37. Tulchinsky, G. L. (2017) ‘Historical Consciousness and Screen Culture’, The art and science of television, 13(1), pp. 110–127. (In Russian).

38. Tulchinsky, G. L. (2019) ‘Screen and Factor of Speed: from Narratives to Performatives’, The Art and Sci- ence of Television, 15(2), pp. 29–40. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30628/1994-9529-2019-15.2-29-40

39. Warf, B. (2002) ‘The Way It Wasn’t: Alternative Histories, Contingent Geographies’, in Lost in Space: Geog- raphies of Science Fiction. London: Continuum, pp. 17–38.