Types and Role of Bows in Modern Vietnamese Culture
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2023-2-26-83-103
Abstract
Recent decades have seen a drastic increase of academic interest in non-verbal communication of various ethnic groups. However, gestural behaviour of the Vietnamese, particularly in the sphere of etiquette, has been rarely analyzed by modern scholars. Research papers on this topic describe etiquette gestures of Vietnamese culture, especially bows, vaguely and sketchily. Although in the past bows used to be widespread in Vietnam, nowadays the gesture seems to have lost its popularity, in comparison with Vietnam’s regional neighbours, such as China, South Korea or Japan. During the preliminary stage of the research, we identified many problem areas concerning rules and situations when people must bow, types, names, and physical forms of Vietnamese bows, which defined the purposes of the research. The goals of the paper are to analyze and systemize the descriptions of Vietnamese bows, rules and situations of their use collected in research literature; to analyze current articles on bows, published by Vietnamese media to understand public opinion about bows and to conduct an online-survey of Vietnamese people (71 people) to obtain additional data, which will help to get more accurate and up-to-date information on the subject. The objective of the research is to identify the role and types of bows in modern Vietnamese culture. The results of the paper show that Vietnamese culture has two basic types (forms) of bows — vái and lạy, with many reduced and intermediate forms, and a nod, which do not have any specific names and require further investigation. The research also identifies numerous etiquette situations where bows are still used and describes rules of bowing in three major contexts of social interaction, such as religious, ceremonial and every-day communication. The results of the media articles and survey analyses show that bows, banned by the Vietnamese Communist Party several decades ago, are gradually starting to acquire more significance in modern society than they had in the past, particularly in business sphere and during religious worships. The results of the paper are not final as the research has outlined new vectors and areas of investigation that require field studies in the country.
About the Authors
S. E. GlazunovaRussian Federation
Svetlana E. Glazunova — Senior Lecturer, Department of the Chinese, Vietnamese, Thai and Laos Languages
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, Russia, 119454 (Russia)
E. B. Morozova
Russian Federation
Elena B. Morozova — PhD in Linguistics, Associate Professor, Department of the English Language No.1
76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, Russia, 119454 (Russia)
References
1. Anosova, L.A. (2014) ‘Vietnam is on the way of Doi Moi: Update’, Economics and management, (6), pp. 4–9. (In Russian).
2. hội. Đặng Nghiêm Vạn (1996) Về tôn giáo tín ngưỡng Việt Nam hiện nay. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Khoa học xã Đào Văn Ngoạn (2022) Văn hóa phong tục tập quán Việt Nam. Nhà xuất bản Xây dựng.
3. Duong Quoc, Q. (2014) ‘Confucianism, Bhuddism and Daosim in Feudal Vietnam’, Space and time, (1), pp. 128–133. (In Russian).
4. Endres, K.W. (2002) ‘Beautiful Customs, Worthy Traditions: Changing State Discourse on the Role of Vietnamese Culture’, Internationales Asienforum, 33(3–4), pp. 303–322. https://doi.org/10.11588/ iaf.2002.33.982
5. Gordienko, E. (2021) ‘Rural Spirits in the City: Vietnamese Cult of Tutelary Spirits in a Modern City (According to Field Work in Vung Tau, Vietnam)’, Kunstkamera, (2), pp. 148–160. (In Russian). https://doi. org/10.31250/2618-8619-2021-2(12)-148-160
6. Grigorieva, N.V. (2014) ‘Koroli Hungi i Izobretenie tradicij" v istorii V’etnama [The Hung Kings and Creation of Traditions]’, V’etnamskie issledovaniya, (4), pp. 229–251. (In Russian).
7. Hu, Yan Li. (2015) ‘Philosophical and religious teachings of China in the contex of socio-cultural globalization’, Teoriia i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiia, (18), pp. 282-286. (In Russian).
8. Kiengsiri, P., Bhinyoying, S. and Promathatavedi, M. (2007) Thai Social Etiquette. Bangkok: Office of the Permanent Secretary for Culture.
9. Knorozova, E.Yu. (2020) Duhovnaya kul’tura V’etnama. Tradicionnye religiozno-mifologicheskie vozzreniya v’etnamcev’ [Spiritual Culture of Vietnam. Traditional Religious and Mythological Views of the Vietnamese]. Saint Petersburg: BAN Publ. (In Russian).
10. Kolotov, V.N. (2013) Tekhnologii ispol’zovaniya religioznogo faktora v upravlyaemyh lokal’nyh konfliktah: YUzhnyj V’etnam v period kolonizacii i indokitajskih vojn (vtoraya chetvert’ XVII – tret’ya chetvert’ XX vv.) [Technologies of Using Religious Factor in Resolving Local Conflicts: South Vietnam During the Period of Colonization and Indochina Wars (Second Quarter of 19th -Third Quarter of 20th cc.]. Saint Petersburg: NRPrint. (In Russian).
11. Lý, K.C. (2002) Hà Nội — Văn Hoá Và Phong Tục’ [Hanoi — Culture and Customs]. Nhà xuất bản Hồng Đức.
12. Malarney, S.K. (2002) Culture, Ritual, and Revolution in Vietnam. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. Marchenko, E.A. (2011) ‘Traditional Fundamentals of Vietnamese Society in Modern Conditions’, V’etnamskie issledovaniya, (1), pp. 90–107. (In Russian).
13. Morozova, E.B. (2019) ‘Russian bows through centuries’, Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, (1), pp. 148–154. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2019-1-9-148-154
14. Novakova, O. v. (2017) ‘The revival of national traditions in Vietnam during the renovation period’, V’etnamskie issledovaniya, (7), pp. 275–293. (In Russian).
15. Pham, C.N., Pham, T. van and Faerman, A. v. (2022) ‘The cult of ancestors in modern Vietnamese society: Perception, role, trends’, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, (475), pp. 176–181. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/475/21
16. Phan, K.B. (2005) Việt Nam Phong Tục. Nhà xuất bản Văn học.
17. Polnoe sobranie istoricheskih zapisok Dajv’eta (Dajv’et shy ki toan thy): v 8 t. [The complete collection of historical notes of Daiviet (Daiviet shy ki toan thy): in 8 vols.] (2020). Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura Publ. (In Russian).
18. Samsonov, D.A. (2013) Korejskij etiket: opyt etnograficheskogo issledovaniya [Korean Etiquette: Experience of ethnographic research]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).
19. Takeda, T. et al. (2016) ‘A Comparative Study of Instructing Methods Regarding Japanese Bowing’, in Digital Human Modeling: Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40247-5_50
20. Wang, D. (2019) ‘The evolution of chinese greeting etiquette before the Xinhai revolution’, Society: phylosophy, history, culture, (8), pp. 176–182. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24158/fik.2019.8.30
Review
For citations:
Glazunova S.E., Morozova E.B. Types and Role of Bows in Modern Vietnamese Culture. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2023;7(2):83-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2023-2-26-83-103