Philosophy of Culture on the Philosophy of Modern Education in China

 In Chinese philosophy, modern processes of searching for the fundamental values of the renewed strategies of education are based upon traditional Confucian approaches as well as upon recent borrowings from Western philosophy. The concept of philosophical dialogue is one example of these borrowings, adopted and radically changed following traditional Chinese logic. Such transformation means adapting the theoretical model of Socrates’ dialogue into Confucian dialogue, the term coined by Chinese authors. This paper considers Chinese developments in the philosophy of culture and aims to specify the ways of such adaptation as applicable to the philosophy of education. The goals of the study are 1) to identify and describe relevant Chinese literature on the subject; 2) to compare its interpretations by Chinese and Russian philosophers; 3) to specify key differences in interpretations of dialogue as educational method. Investigating the issue through philosophical and cultural lens, incorporating the standpoint of modern comparative studies, as well as the critical analysis of the logic of those theories in their historical and cultural context by means of the hermeneutic approach makes it possible for Chinese authors to focus on the cultural peculiarities of the Chinese way of thinking and to identify the correlation between the Western concept way of thinking and the concept of Chinese logic. This study analyzes the works of modern Chinese philosophers specializing in the specific cultural character of China through the prism of the philosophy of education. The paper concludes that in Chinese logic technical (in the Western understanding regarded as cognitive and formal logical) methods are inferior to ethical and social value orientations. Another finding is that Chinese authors tend to consider Confucian logic as part of dialogue, and dialogue is viewed as a means of moral education. Methodologically this finding leads the author to suggest that the Chinese-specific way of thinking, its philosophical culture, cannot be fully perceived by utilizing comparison with analogous concepts of Western philosophical thought. It would be equally beneficial to compare the conceptual framework of the Chinese philosophy of education with the concepts borrowed from Western philosophy. 

1. Chumakov, A. N. (2011) ‘Philosophy as an indicator of cultural and civilizational social development’, Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University, (1), pp. 18–23. (In Russian).

2. Feng, J. (2016) ‘Jiàoyù zhéxué zhōng de “rén” yǔ rén de “jiàoyù zhéxué” ["Man" in the Philosophy of Education and “Philosophy of Education” in Man]’, Jiàoyù xuéshù yuèkān [Educational Academic Monthly], (201610), pp. 3–12. (In Chinese).

3. Ivanova, O. E. and Tochilkina, T. G. (2017) ‘Socratic Dialogue as a studying to the joint solution of problems’, Azimuth of scientific researches: pedagogy and psychology, 6(3), pp. 108–111. (In Russian).

4. Ivanova, O. and Gnatyshina, E. (2018) ‘Socratic dialogue as a method of problem management’, Philosophical thought, (4), pp. 59–65. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2018.4.24133

5. Kobzev, A. I. (2006) ‘Logika i dialektika v Kitaye [ Logic and dialectics in China]’, in Dukhovnaya kul'tura Kitaya: Entsiklopediya: v 5 t. T. 1. Filosofiya [Spiritual culture of China: Encyclopedia: in 6 vol. Vol. 1. Philosophy]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura Publ. P. 82–125. (In Russian).

6. Krushinsky, A. (2016) ‘Logic in ancient China’, Philosophy Journal, 9(4), pp. 111–127. (In Russian). https:// doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2016-9-4-111-127

7. Krushinsky, A. A. (2009) ‘Style of thinking of Ancient China: Logic and Methodological aspect’, Voprosy filosofii, (1), pp. 104–108. (In Russian).

8. Krushinsky, A. A. (2012) ‘The problem of methodological premises of adequate translation: the Chinese mode of thinking and their lanuage picture of the world’, Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series Philosophy, (4), pp. 57–76. (In Russian).

9. Krushinsky, A. A. (2015) ‘Studies in the history of logical thought of Ancient China: dead ends and outs (historiography of the problem)’, Voprosy filosofii, (4), pp. 170–184. (In Russian).

10. Oittinen, V. (2018) ‘What Is Philosophical Culture?’, Vox. Philosophical journal, (24), pp. 39–49. https://doi. org/10.24411/2077-6608-2017-00035

11. Osipov, V. E. (2019) ‘Philosophical wisdom as essential element of spiritual culture of the person’, Kulʹtura, nauka, obrazovanie, (4), pp. 7–20. (In Russian).

12. Pan, T. Q. (2013) ‘Luo ji xue shi yu zhong de si xiang fen xi ji shu [Thought Analysis Techniques in the Perspective of Logic]’, Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences), (1), pp. 141–147. (In Chinese).

13. Shen, J. Q. (2008) ‘Cóng “duìhuà” dào “sū gélā dǐ shì de jiàoyù” de yuèshēng——lùn cúnzài zhǔyì guānzhào xià de jiàoyù [From “Dialogue” to the Ascension of “Socratic Education” On Education from the Perspective of Existentialism]’, Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), (4), pp. 23–30. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2008.04.006

14. Yuan, Y. (1988) ‘Jiàoyù shǐshàng liǎng gè duìhuà fǎ de zuìzǎo fànlì jí qí bǐjiào [The Earliest Examples of Two Dialogue Methods in the History of Education and Their Comparison]’, Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 6(2), pp. 21–25. (In Chinese).

15. Zarapin, O. V. (2018) ‘Philosophical culture as a textual dialogue culture: a way to the digital format’,

16. Učenye zapiski Krymskogo federalʹnogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Filosofiâ, politologiâ, kulʹturologiâ, 4(4), pp. 13–24. (In Russian).

17. Zhang, Y. and Yu, Y. (2005) ‘On Dewey’s Philosophy of Education and Its Meaning’, The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute, 6(4), pp. 20–27. (In Chinese).

18. Zhao, N. (2014) ‘Zhéxué zīxún: Dàodé jiàoyù de xīn móshì [Philosophical Consultation: A New Model of Moral Education]’, Shǒuyè dàlù qíkān xuéxiào xì suǒ jiàoyù xuébào [Journal of Mainland Periodicals School Department], 6(10–3), pp. 34–38. (In Chinese).