Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

New/Old Idea of Man in Urban Religious Communities of a New Type

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2023-4-28-59-75

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to establish the specificities of the formation of ideas about a person within the framework of the activities of the new urban religious communities of the Kama region, namely the Intercession Monastery and the Family of God. These communities combine features of folk religiosity, new religious movements, and the so-called historical sects. Such eclecticism makes it impossible to apply to the communities the established research apparatus for new religious movements (NRMs), formed by Western (B. Wilson, D. Stone, A. Barker) and Russian (L. N. Mitrokhin, E. A. Balagushkin, I. Kanterov and others) researchers and substantiates the need for this study conducted from both a different perspective and involving new research methodology. Both communities act as a closed community, which is expressed in the territorial and communication isolation of the residents of the communal estate, the practice of internal labor duties, and the idea of the group as a family. The study is based on interviews and correspondence with former members of both communities, analysis of materials from a closed group on a social network, and recordings of classes conducted by one of the group leaders. The theoretical basis of the work was K. Dobellard’s concept of the so-called patchwork religiosity, characteristic of an individual’s attitude towards religion in modern culture. The image of a person in both communities is constructed at two levels: through making changes to the traditional Christian idea of a person and at the level of religious and near-religious activities. It has been shown that innovations related to faith include the idea of a special status of community members compared to other people, as well as provisions about their special role in the struggle to save the world. The religious activities of the groups involve conducting adjusted Christian rituals (baptism, wedding), elements of mystical experience (mental struggle with evil and enemies in the Intercession Monastery), training seminars and sermons justifying the special role of followers of the teaching in society. Social interaction within communities is built on a strict selection of monks, leader control over the behavior of group members, a system of specific penalties, including ignoring offenders, public repentance, burial alive and expulsion from the brotherhood. The study concludes that the so-called new religious movements are in reality examples of traditional religious sects observed in Russia over the centuries. Their values, behavior, and the image of the person are archaic, however they also include additional external elements of secular culture.

About the Author

S. V. Ryazanova
Perm Federal Research Center Ural Branch Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Svetlana V. Ryazanova — Doctor of Philosophy, docent, Senior Researcher at PFR Center of Ural division

13A, ul. Lenina, Perm’, Russia, 614990 (Russia)



References

1. Aidala, A. A. (1985) ‘Social Change, Gender Roles, and New Religious Movements’, Sociological Analysis, 46(3), pp. 287–314. https://doi.org/10.2307/3710695

2. Asad, T. (1993) ‘The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category’, in A Reader in the Anthropology of Religion. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 110–126.

3. Balagushkin, E. G. (1999) Netradicionnye religii v sovremennoj Rossii. Morfologicheskij analiz. [Nontraditional religions in modern Russia. Morphological analysis]. Moscow: IF RAN Publ. (In Russian).

4. Barker, E. (1982) New Religious Movements: A Perspective for Understanding Society. New York: Edwin Mellen Press. (Russ. ed.: (1997) Novye religioznye dvizheniya: Prakticheskoe vvedenie. Saint Petersburg: Russkij Christianskij Gumanitarnyj Inst. Publ.).

5. Beckford, J. A. (1981) ‘Cults, Controversy and Control: A Comparative Analysis of the Problems Posed by New Religious Movements in the Federal Republic of Germany and France’, Sociological Analysis, 42(3), pp. 249–264. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711037

6. Beckford, J. A. (1983) ‘Some Questions about the Relationship between Scholars and the New Religious Movements’, Sociological Analysis, 44(3), pp. 189–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711499

7. Berger, A. L. (1980) ‘Hasidism and Moonism: Charisma in the Counterculture’, Sociological Analysis, 41(4), pp. 375–390. https://doi.org/10.2307/3709891

8. Borovik, I. (1997) ‘Institutional and private religion in Poland’, in New religious phenomena in Central and Eastern Europe. Kraków: Nomos Publ., pp. 235–255.

9. Campbell, B. (1978) ‘A Typology of Cults’, Sociological Analysis, 39(3), pp. 228–240. https://doi. org/10.2307/3710443

10. Davie, G. (2001) ‘Global Civil Religion: A European Perspective’, Sociology of Religion, 62(4), pp. 455–473. https://doi.org/10.2307/3712436

11. Dobbelaere, K. (2004) ‘Assessing Secularization Theory’, in Textual, Comparative, Sociological, and Cognitive Approaches. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 229–254. https://doi.org/10.1515/978311021 1719.3.229

12. Grigoryeva, L. I. (2001) Novye religioznye dvizheniya i gosudarstvo v sovremennoj Rossii [New religious movements and the state in modern Russia]. Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russian).

13. Grigoryeva, L. I. (2002) Religii ‘Novogo veka’ i sovremennoye gosudarstvo [New Age religions and the contemporary state]. Krasnoyarsk: SibGTU Publ. (In Russian).

14. Grigulevich, I. R. (1983) Proroki «novoj istiny»: ocherki o kul’tah i sueveriyah sovremennogo kapitalisticheskogo mira [Prophets of the “New Truth”: Essays on the cults and superstitions of the modern capitalist world]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ. (In Russian).

15. Gurevich, P. S. (1985) Netradicionnye religii na Zapade i vostochnye religioznye kul’ty [Non-traditional religions in the West and eastern religious cults]. Moscow: Znanie Publ. (In Russian).

16. Gussner, R. E. and Berkowitz, S. D. (1988) ‘Scholars, Sects and Sanghas, I: Recruitment to AsianBased Meditation Groups in North America’, Sociological Analysis, 49(2), pp. 136–170. https://doi. org/10.2307/3711010

17. Hoge, D. R. and Smith, E. I. (1982) ‘Normative and Non-Normative Religious Experience among High School Youth’, Sociological Analysis, 43(1), pp. 69–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711419

18. Johnson, B. (1992) ‘On Founders and Followers: Some Factors in the Development of New Religious Movements’, Sociological Analysis, 53(S), pp. S1–S13. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711247

19. Kanterov, I. Y. (2006) Novye religioznye dvizheniya v Rossii: (religiovedcheskij analiz) [New religious movements in Russia: (religious analysis)]. Moscow. (In Russian).

20. Kisala, R. (2004) ‘Urbanization and Religion’, in Textual, Comparative, Sociological, and Cognitive Approaches. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211719.3.255

21. Kluev, B. I. (1984) ‘Neoreligioznye dvizheniya v sovremennoj Indii [Non-religious movements in modern India]’, Peoples of Asia and Africa, (6), pp. 25–34. (In Russian).

22. Matveev, V. (1990) ‘Predannye Krishny — kto oni? [Krsna’s devotees — who are they?]’, Nauka i religiâ, (10), pp. 25–28. (In Russian).

23. Mitchell, C. (2006) ‘The Religious Content of Ethnic Identities’, Sociology, 40(6), pp. 1135–1152. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0038038506069854

24. Mitrokhin, N. (1985) Religii «novogo veka» [Religions of the New century]. Moscow: Sov. Rossiya Publ. (In Russian).

25. Nevill, R. (1995) ‘«Bostonskoe konfucianstvo» — korni vostochnoj kul’tury na zapadnoj pochve ["Boston Confucianism" - the roots of Eastern culture on Western soil]’, Far Eastern studies, (1), pp. 138–149. (In Russian).

26. Nikiforova, B. (1976) ‘Iskaniya molodezhi i “Dvizhenie Iisusa” [The Searches of Youth and the Jesus Movement]’, Nauka i religiâ, (5), pp. 78–80. (In Russian).

27. Panchenko, A. A. (2004) Khristovshchina i skopchestvo: Fol’klor i tradicionnaya kul’tura russkih misticheskih sekt [Christendom and Savings: Folklore and the Traditional Culture of Russian Mystical Sects]. Moscow: O.G.I. Publ. (In Russian).

28. Riazanova, S. V. (2020) ‘The Closed Religious Community: the Strategy of Forming аnd the Principles of Functioning’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i socialnaja praktika, 8(2), pp. 86–100. (In Russian). https://doi. org/10.19181/snsp.2020.8.2.7306

29. Riazanova, S. V. (2023) ‘The “God’s Family” church: a case of local messianism’, Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, (2), pp. 67–79.

30. Robbins, T., Anthony, D. and Richardson, J. (1978) ‘Theory and Research on Today’s “New Religions”’, Sociological Analysis, 39(2), pp. 95–122. https://doi.org/10.2307/3710211 Robertson, R. (1979) ‘Religious Movements and Modern Societies: Toward a Progressive Problemshift’, Sociological Analysis, 40(4), pp. 297–314. https://doi.org/10.2307/3709959

31. Rüpke, J. (2020) Urban Religion: A Historical Approach to Urban Growth and Religious Change. Berlin;

32. Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110634426

33. Ryazanova, S. (2019) ‘Popular Theology in the God’s family church: subjects, images, myths’, Technologos, (1), pp. 85–100. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15593/perm.kipf/2019.1.07

34. Ryazanova, S. (2019) ‘The role of the regional factor determining the local religious situation’, Perm Scientific Center Journal, 12(1), pp. 55–62. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.7242/2658-705X/2019.1.5

35. Ryazanova, S. (2021) ‘Isolated communities as a phenomenon of contemporary religious life’, St.Tikhons’ University Review, (96), pp. 119–135. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15382/sturI202196.119-135

36. Ryazanova, S. V. (2020) ‘Balances of Power in Closed Religious Communities (Local Case)’, Humanitarian Vector, 15(4), pp. 24–32. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-4-24-32

37. Ryazanova, S. V. (2022) ‘Talking to God: Religion, Para-Science and Disciplinary Practices as Consolidation Tools’, Changing Societies & Personalities, 6(1), pp. 182–196. https://doi.org/10.15826/ csp.2022.6.1.169

38. Ryazanova, S. V. (2022) ‘Transforming an Orthodox Parish: from Catechesis to Patriotism (the Case of the Intercession Commune in Perm)’, Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, 6(4), pp. 41–54. (In Russian). https:// doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-4-24-41-54

39. Senin, Y. (1969) ‘SSHA: Krizis very [USA: The Crisis of Faith]’, Nauka i religiâ, (9), pp. 88–89. (In Russian).

40. Srinivas, S. (2012) ‘Urban forms of religious practice’, in The Cambridge Companion to Modern Indian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521516259.006

41. Stone, D. (1978) ‘New Religious Consciousness and Personal Religious Experience’, Sociological Analysis, 39(2), pp. 123–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/3710212

42. Stump, R. W. (1986) ‘Regional Variations in the Determinants of Religious Participation’, Review of Religious Research, 27(3), pp. 208–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/3511417

43. Swatos, W. H. (1981) ‘Church-Sect and Cult: Bringing Mysticism Back In’, Sociological Analysis, 42(1), pp. 17–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/3709699

44. Tkacheva, A. A. (1989) Induistskie misticheskie organizacii i dialog kul’tur [Hindu mystical organizations and dialogue of cultures]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

45. Tkacheva, A. A. (1991) Novye religii Vostoka [New religions of the East]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

46. Wallis, R. (1988) ‘Paradoxes of Freedom and Regulation: The Case of New Religious Movements in Britain and America’, Sociological Analysis, 48(4), pp. 355–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/3710873

47. Wilson B.R. (2005) ‘Absolutes and relatives: two problems for new religious movements’, in Challenging Religion. Essays in honor of Eileen Barker. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 11–20. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780203299432

48. Zabiyako, A. P. (1992) ‘Spasut li nas chuzhie bogi [Will alien gods save us]’, Perspektivy, (2), pp. 112–118. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Ryazanova S.V. New/Old Idea of Man in Urban Religious Communities of a New Type. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2023;7(4):59-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2023-4-28-59-75

Views: 284


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)