Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

Evolution of the Concept of Barbarism within the Context of the Franco-German Confrontation in the 1870s–1910s

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2024-1-29-25-43

Abstract

Intolerance, demonization and hate speech used to be an integral part of Franco-German relations in the 19th century. The paper is devoted to the analysis of the image of barbarians within the context of the confrontation between France and Germany in 1870s–1910s. Creation and transformation of political myths is viewed through the lens of cultural artefacts. The study is topical because it allows for the analysis of the universal development of cultural confrontation on a specific example. The prime goal of the article is to identify the patterns of mutual stigmatization and account for their seeming anomalies or exceptions to these patterns: the German simultaneously viewed as well-educated and barbarian; common origins of barbarian and classical antique cultures resulting in opposing identities, etc. The aims of the study include: 1) to systematize empirical sources; 2) to assess the impact of historical and cultural context on the formation of the conceptual images of barbaric and civilized; 3) to single out basic dichotomies of the barbaric vs civilized opposition. The study was based on various cultural texts of the period, ranging from speeches, essays, and memoirs to posters and monuments. Methods used included comparative, semiotic, and imagological approaches, corpus, discourse, and content analyses. French newspaper clichés are compared to the Europe-wide opinions about Prussian militarism. As it turns out, the German way of thinking about the heroes of the past contributed to political stigmatization of Germany. Another finding, based on French literature, is the unobvious correlation between decadent world perception and political turmoil in France. Modernist poetry, literature and journalism compared the fall of the French Empire to the collapse of the Roman Empire and thus contributed to the conceptualizing of the German as barbarians. At the same time German propaganda attempted to defend itself by finding barbarians on the east and ironically quoting French sources to speak about actual war crimes. The results of the study show that seemingly chaotic hate speech and confrontation are determined on the basis of the specific rules related to age-old non-political traditions and current political circumstances marking the dichotomy between oneself and the other, friend or foe.

About the Author

K. S. Antonevich
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Konstantin S. Antonevich — PhD student, Department of the World Literature and Culture

76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, Russia, 119454 (Russia)



References

1. Aust, H. (1997) ‘Schriftseller und Nation im Wilhelminismus’, in Die Intellektuellen und die nationale Frage. Frankfurt; New York: Campus Verlag, pp. 107–124.

2. Baranov, N. N. (2005) ‘The “Hun Speech” of Kaiser William II in the Intellectual Context of the Epoch’, Imagines mundi, 5(3), pp. 262–268. (In Russian).

3. Benjamin, H. C. (1932) ‘Official Propaganda and the French Press during the Franco-Prussian War’,

4. The Journal of Modern History, 4(2), pp. 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1086/235868

5. Birley, A. (1999) ‘Tacitus' Style and Influence’, in Agricola and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. XXXV–XXIX.

6. Jeismann, M. (1992) ‘Rückkehr der Barbaren? Vae Victoribus’, in Das Vaterland der Feinde: Studien zum nationalen Feindbegriff und Selbstverständnis in Deutschland und Frankreich 1792–1918. Stuttgart: KlettCotta, pp. 207–240.

7. Koch, U. E. (1996) ‘Du Printemps des peuples à la guerre franco-allemande (de 1848 à 1870-1871)’, in La Caricature entre République et censure. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon, pp. 370–382. https://doi. org/10.4000/books.pul.8054

8. Korotkov, M. Y. (2010) ‘K probleme «chuzhogo» v sovremennoy fenomenologii [On the problem of the “alien” in modern phenomenology]’, Central Russian journal of social sciences, (3), pp. 13–17. (In Russian).

9. Krobb, F. (2004) ‘“Die Kunst der Väter tödtet das Leben der Enkel”: Decadence and Crisis in Fin-de-Siècle German and Austrian Discourse’, New Literary History, 35(4), pp. 547–562.

10. Kuznetsov, D. (2016) The ‘Shadow’ of Vietnam over America. American Public Opinion and the Use of US Military Force after the Vietnam War (1973–2009). Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija Publ. (In Russian).

11. Malik, S. (2019) ‘Decadence and Roman Historiography’, in Decadence and Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Critical Concepts), pp. 30–46. https://doi. org/10.1017/9781108550826.003

12. Mironova, E. V. (2018) ‘Germany through the Prism of Russian Propaganda Post-Cards from World War I’, Historical and social-educational ideas, 10(3/2), pp. 42–53. (In Russian). https://doi. org/10.17748/2075-9908-2018-10-3/2-42-53

13. Moses, J. A. (2005) ‘La théorie de la guerre juste dans l’Empire allemand (1871-1918): un phénomène protestant’, Mil neuf cent. Revue d’histoire intellectuelle, 23(1), pp. 143–166. https://doi.org/10.3917/ mnc.023.0143

14. Moßmann, W. and Schleuning, P. (1978) Alte und neue politische Lieder. Entstehung und Gebrauch, Texte und Noten. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

15. Obidina, Y. S. (2023) ‘Barbarism as a “Pattern” of Otherness in the Context of the Cultural Evolution of the Ancient Greeks’, Čelovek, kulʹtura, obrazovanie, (2), pp. 107–125. (In Russian). https://doi. org/10.34130/2233-1277-2023-2-107

16. Pross, C. (2013) Dekadenz: Studien zu einer großen Erzählung der frühen Moderne. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783835323438

17. Romanova, А. Р. et al. (2011) ‘Fenomenologiya Chuzhogo v dvadtsatoy kul’turnoy (etnokonfessional’noy) bezopasnosti [Phenomenology of the Alien in the context of cultural (ethno-confessional) security]’, Human. Community. Management, (1), pp. 44–56. (In Russian).

18. Schmidt, A. (2007) ‘Teil II. Deutschlandbilder Im Zeichen Humanistischer Tradition’, in Vaterlandsliebe und Religionskonflikt: Politische Diskurse im Alten Reich (1555-1648). Leiden: BRILL, pp. 125–191. https://doi. org/10.1163/ej.9789004161573.i-512.19

19. Sokolova, E. (2021) ‘Foresinging the First World War: Oscillating Image of War in German Lyrics of 1911–1914’, Herald of Culturology, (3), pp. 44–59. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/hoc/2021.03.03

20. Werner, M. (1995) ‘La nation revisitée en 1870-1871. Visions et redéfinitions de la nation en France pendant le conflit franco-allemand’, Revue germanique internationale, (4), pp. 181–200. https://doi.org/10.4000/ rgi.525

21. Wetzel, D. (2012) A Duel of Nations: Germany, France, and the Diplomacy of the War of 1870–1871. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.


Review

For citations:


Antonevich K.S. Evolution of the Concept of Barbarism within the Context of the Franco-German Confrontation in the 1870s–1910s. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2024;8(1):25-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2024-1-29-25-43

Views: 497


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)