The Phenomenon of Authors Religiosity in the Context of Compliance and Intercultural Communication (A Philosophical and Religious Approach)

Over the past decades the term compliance has become increasingly widely used globally, making its way into national languages. The same is true for Russian academic discourse were compliance (or its Russian analogue “комплаенс”) has become common in a number of areas ranging from business and law to healthcare. This trend as well as cultural practices of revitalizing the social role of religion, which can also be viewed as a form of compliance, substantiate the relevance of this study. The word compliance with the meaning of agreement, accordance and self-restriction has been known in the English language since the 13th century. During the Reformation it notably referred to agreement with people of other beliefs. The purpose of this study is to trace the use of the term and describe its functioning today by analyzing forms corresponding to compliance, especially those with religious connotations. The following goals are set: 1) to describe the linguistic and etymological peculiarities of compliance in various cultural contexts and to specify the grounds for its understanding as a broader concept; 2) to trace the transformation of the concept from religious to secular and to compare personal and group identity markers; 3) to identify the specifics of the cultural practice of compliance as voluntary consent of group and personal religiosity on the example of creative writing; 4) based on texts by A. P. Chekhov to establish the features of the modern cultural optics of compliance in relation to the cultural phenomena of the past; 5) to highlight the key features of reading the works of A. P. Chekhov from the perspective of compliance. The research materials include data from dictionaries and encyclopedias, the linguistic database National Corpus of the Russian Language and selected works by A. P. Chekhov. The work, based on anthropological, axiological, and hermeneutic approaches, uses the methods of discourse analysis and narrative analysis, as well as the biographical method. The return to the broader meaning of the concept of compliance is associated with the peculiarities of the current cultural situation, requiring special attention to the coordination of both secular and religious aspects at group and personal levels. Firstly, in Russian this is fixed by referring to the English term compliance, which goes back to the Latin word complere. Secondly, the conceptual apparatus for describing and understanding religion has been historically developed as a series of forms representing normative aspects of the religious (confessional) identity of the elites of a particular historical period in a particular geographic region. Folk and authored interpretations have been relegated to the realm of marginal superstitions and heresies for thousands of years. Thirdly, the so-called Age of Magazines and Writers opened up new possibilities and ways of representing the deepest experiences of an individual author in literary work that connects the individual with the universal, the intimate with the public, and the instantaneous with the eternal, sometimes giving rise to works that receive worldwide recognition (A. P. Chekhov). However, reflection on this process has become possible relatively recently;  Finally, by using the example of the works of A. P. Chekhov, to review compliance of literature and religion in a writer’s work, it has allowed us to highlight the specifics of his artistic realism, based on the techniques of mirror image, and inscribing the conventional magic of personal writing in the time of the religious understanding of culture. As a result, the conclusion is substantiated that the globally recognized work of A. P. Chekhov can be interpreted as an example of the presentation of religion as living religiosity, i.e. the universal social and personal phenomenon of constructing successful practices of supervising the unknown (N. Luhmann), forming historically special institutional and vernacular forms of their unique personal experience.

1. Afanasyev, A. (1994) Poeticheskie vozzreniia slavian na prirodu: v 3 t. T. 1 [Poetic views of the Slavs on nature: in 3 vol. Vol.1]. Moscow: Indrik Publ. (In Russian).

2. Aremu, T. O. et al. (2022) ‘Medication Adherence and Compliance: Recipe for Improving Patient Outcomes’, Pharmacy, 10(5), p. 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy10050106

3. Arinin, E. I. (2023) ‘Estetika «lѣpoty»: vera (religioznost’) tantsora, khudozhnikaipoeta v svetepodkho dovsovremennogoreligiovedeniia` [Aesthetics of “lepota”: faith (religiosity) of a dancer, artist and poet in the light of the approaches of modern religious studies]’, in III Rossiyskiy esteticheskiy kongress: estetika vo vremena trebuyet peremen. T.1. [III Russian Aesthetic Congress: aesthetics in times of global change. Vol. 1]. Vladimir: Arkaim Publ., pp. 26–28. (In Russian).

4. Arinin, E. I. and Martirosyan, V. S. (2023) ‘Religion, religiosity and conceptual approaches to artistic thinking’, Vestnik Vladimirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Aleksandra Grigorʹeviča i Nikolaâ Grigorʹeviča Stoletovyh. Socialʹnye i gumanitarnye nauki, (3), pp. 65–79. (In Russian).

5. Arinin, E. I. et al. (2023) ‘Religiousity and medicine: compliance between images of media and rationality’, Study of religion, (3), pp. 118–128. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22250/20728662_2023_3_118

6. Assmann, J. (1992) Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. München: Beck. (Russ. ed.: (2004) Kul’turnaja pamjat’: Pys’mo y pamjat’ o proshlom y polytycheskaja ydentychnost’ v vyysokyh kul’turah drevnosty. Moscow: Jazyyky slavjanskoj kul’turyy) Badiou, A. (1998) Petit Manuel d’inesthétique. Paris: Editions du Seuil (L’Ordre philosophique).

7. Badunova, I. (2014) ‘Textual phenomenon in dance’, Art and Culture, (4), pp. 88–94. (In Russian).

8. Bakhtin, M. M. (1979) Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of Verbal Art]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russian).

9. Bakhtin, M. M. (1990) Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kul’tura srednevekov’ya i Renessansa [Rabelais and Folk Culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia lit-ra Publ. (In Russian).

10. Bergson, H. (1932) Les Deux Sources de la morale et de la religion. Paris: Librairie Felix Alcan.

11. Bialy, G. (1981) Chekhov i russkii realizm [Chekhov and Russian realism]. Leningrad: Sovetsky Pisatel Publ. (In Russian).

12. Chudakov, A. (1971) Poetika Chekhova [Chekhov’s Poetics]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

13. Dolzhenkov, P. (2003) Chekhov i pozitivizm [Chekhov and positivism]. Moscow: Scorpio Publ. (In Russian).

14. Dyakonova, L. T. (2011) ‘Tanets kak fenomen kul’tury [Dance as a cultural phenomenon]’, Obŝestvo, sreda, razvitie, (3), pp. 155–158. (In Russian).

15. Ellis, H. (1923) The dance of life. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

16. Fedotova, E. D. (2018) ‘Rodin and the problem of «abiding by literature»’, The Art of Eurasia, (3), pp.

17. –178. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25712/ASTU.2518-7767.2018.03.015

18. Florensky, P. (2007) Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny [Pillar and statement of truth]. Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russian).

19. Florensky, P. (2008) Imena: Sochineniia [Names: Works]. Moscow: Exmo Publ. (In Russian).

20. Gamkrelidze, T. and Ivanov, V. (1984) Indoevropeiskii iazyk i indoevropeitsy. Rekonstruktsiia i istorikotipologicheskii analiz praiazyka i protokul’tury. Kn. 2 [Indo-European language and Indo-Europeans. Reconstruction and historical-typological analysis of proto-language and protoculture, Book 2]. Tbilisi: Izdvo Tbilisskogo un-ta Publ. (In Russian).

21. Giacomo, G. Di (1999) Estetica e letteratura. Il grande romanzo tra Ottocento e Novecento. Roma; Bari: Editori Laterza.

22. Grankin, M. B. and Zhigas, M. G. (2016) ‘The compliance culture as the most important element of the compliance risk management system’, Baikal Research Journal, 7(3). (In Russian). https://doi. org/10.17150/2411-6262.2016.7(3).3

23. Ivanov, V. (1987) Sobranie sochinenii: v 4 t. T. 4 [Collected works: in 4 vol. Vol. 4]. Brussels: Foyer Oriental Chretien Publ. (In Russian).

24. Ivanov, V. (1999) Izbrannye trudy po semiotike i istoriikul’tury. T.1 [Selected works on semiotics and cultural history. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Jazyki rus. kul’tury Publ. (In Russian).

25. Ivanov, V. and Toporov, V. (1974) Issledovaniia v oblasti slavianskikh drevnostei [Research in the field of Slavic antiquities]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

26. Koroleva, E. A. (1975) ‘Tanets, ego proiskhozhdenieimetodyissledovaniia (po rabotamzarubezhnykhuchenykh XX veka)` [Dance, its origin and research methods (based on the works of foreign scientists of the 20th century)]’, Sovetskaya etnografiya, (5), pp. 147–155. (In Russian).

27. Kostylev, P. N. (2013) ‘Institutionalization of religious studies in Moscow State University in first half of xx century’, Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svâto-Tihonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriâ I. Bogoslovie, filosofiâ, (5), pp. 79–95. (In Russian).

28. Kuçuradi, I. (2019) ‘Literatura i filosofiya [Literature and philosophy]’, Philosophy and society, 1(90), pp. 74–94. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30884/jfio/2019.01.05

29. Levi-Strauss, C. (1968) Mythologiques 3: L’origine des manières de table. Lutetiae: Plon. (Russ. ed.: (2000) Mifologiki: v 4 tomakh. T. 3. Proiskhozhdeniye zastol’nykh obychayev. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga Publ.).

30. Likhachev, D. S. (1987) Izbrannye raboty: v 3 t. T. 3 [Selected works: in 3 vol. Vol. 3]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia lit-ra Publ. (In Russian).

31. Losev, A. (2001) Dialektika mifa [Dialectics of myth]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian).

32. Losev, A. F. (2000) Istoriya antichnoy estetiki: v 8 t. T. 8. Itogi tysyacheletnego razvitiya: v 2-kh kn. Kn. 2. [History of ancient aesthetics: in 8 vol. Vol. 8. Results of millennial development: in 2 books. Book. 2]. Kharkiv: Folio Publ; Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russian).

33. Lotman, Y. (1992) Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 t. T. 1. Stat’i po semiotike i tipologii kul’tury [Selected articles: in 3 vol. Articles on semiotics and typology of culture]. Tallinn: Aleksandra Publ. (In Russian).

34. Lozhkina, L. I. (2015) ‘Compliance as an Actual Problem of Medical Psychology: TheoreticalMethodological Aspects’, Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 15(3), pp. 75–80. (In Russian). https://doi. org/10.18500/1819-7671-2015-15-3-75-80

35. Malinowski, B. K. (1925) Magic, science and religion and other essays. New York: Doubleday Incorporated.

36. Nikulin, L. (1960) ‘Khudozhnik zhizni [Artist of Life]’, in Velikiy khudozhnik [Great artist]. Rostov-on-Don: Rostovskoye knizhnoye izd-vo Publ., pp. 33–73. (In Russian).

37. Orekhov, R. A. (2014) Mir stroitelei piramid: Epokha Drevnego tsarstva [The world of the pyramid builders. The era of the Old Kingdom]. Saint Petersburg: Kontrast Publ. (In Russian).

38. Podoroga, V. A. (2009) ‘What is being asked when one asks about what is philosophy’, Philosophy journal, (1), pp. 5–17. (In Russian).

39. Propp, V. (1986) Istoricheskie korni volshebnoi skazki [Historical roots of a fairy tale]. Leningrad: LGU Publ. (In Russian).

40. Razumova, N. (2001) Tvorchestvo A. P. Chekhova v aspekte prostranstva [Creativity of A.P. Chekhov in the aspect of space]. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomsk. gos. un-ta Publ. (In Russian).

41. Rorty, R. (2003) ‘Ot religii cherez filosofiyu k literature: put’ zapadnykh intellektualov [From religion through philosophy to literature: the way the Western intellectuals went]’, Voprosy Filosofii, (3), pp. 30–41. (In Russian).

42. Savinov, A. A. (2022) ‘Conceptual and historical understanding of the relationship between "slovesnost’" and “literature”’, Kulʹtura i obrazovanie, (3), pp. 56–69. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24412/2310-16792022-346-56-69

43. Shubin, B. (1982) Doctor A. P. Chekhov. Moscow: Znanie Publ. (In Russian).

44. Solovyov, V. (1988) ‘Krizis zapadnoi filosofii (protiv pozitivistov) [The crisis of Western philosophy (against the positivists)]’, in Sochineniia v 2 t.: T.2 [Collected Works: in 2 vol.: Vol. 2]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., pp. 3–138. (In Russian).

45. Tayanova, T. A. (2012) ‘Literature and religion: religious writer’s dual religious belief’, Journal of historical, philological and cultural studies, (3), pp. 232–240. (In Russian).

46. Tkachenko, Y. A. and Shevchenko, M. (2016) ‘Compliance-control as a key factor in the management of the economic subject’, Bulletin of Belgorod State Technological University named after. V. G. Shukhov, 1(2), pp. 196–199. (In Russian).

47. Uspensky, B. (1996) Izbrannye trudy: v 3 t. T. 1. Semiotika istorii. Semiotika kul’tury [Selected works: in 3 vol. Vol. 1. Semiotics of history. Semiotics of culture]. Moscow: Jazyki rus. kul’tury Publ. (In Russian).

48. Weninger, R. (2009) ‘Manfred Beller and Joep Leerssen (eds.), Imagology: The Cultural Construction and Literary Representation of National Characters – A Critical Survey. Series: Studia Imagologica , vol. 13; series editors: Hugo Dyserinck and Joep Leerssen (Amsterdam and and New York: Rodopi, 2007). ISBN 978-90-420-2318-5, €45’, Comparative Critical Studies, 6(2), pp. 281–285. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1744185409000779

49. Wright, D. F. B., Sinnappah, K. A. and Hughes, D. A. (2023) ‘Medication adherence research comes of age’, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 89(7), pp. 1914–1917. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15722

50. Xia, L. (2019) ‘The term literature in a pre-revolutionary russian philological tradition (on the material of P. V. Smirnovsky’s textbook “Theory of literature”, 1913)’, Verhnevolzhski philological bulletin, (1), pp. 72–77. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/2499-9679-2019-10315