From the Theory of Globalization to the Theory of Cultural Globalization: The Theoretical Search of Chinese Philosophers
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2024-4-32-22-36
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of Chinese philosophers’ scientific positions on globalization and cultural globalization. With the ongoing debate on globalization, its current state and long-term consequences, it is of relevance to consider the non-Western perspective on the topic. The purpose of the study is to systematize the ideas of Chinese philosophers on globalization and cultural globalization. To achieve this goal, several tasks need to be solved: 1) to define the scope of ideas relevant to the research into the specificities of Chinese philosophical approaches to globalization; 2) to identify the specificities of Chinese philosophy as a science; 3) to consider key interpretations of globalization; 4) to clarify the different interpretations of cultural globalization and the globalization of culture and the grounds for distinguishing between them. The research materials are the works of Chinese philosophers, many of which are being introduced into scientific circulation outside China for the first time. The research methodology is based on the phenomenological approach and the systemic method, which allows the author to describe the development of the ways of conceptualizing the phenomenon of globalization in the works of Chinese philosophers as a holistic research process. The procedures of discourse analysis and the method of participant observation were also used. As a result, a systemic reconstruction of the process of conceptualization of globalization and cultural globalization in modern philosophy of China was obtained. The work notes that this process is still incomplete and identifies a group of authors working on it. It is established that the one specificity of the scientific nature of modern Chinese philosophy presupposes reliance on the ideas of Marxism and ideological guidelines formulated by the party leadership of the PRC, primarily Chairman Xi Jinping. Another is the focus on comparing significant ideas of foreign philosophers with Chinese traditional views and values. This allows adapting and incorporating the idea of globalization to the Chinese system of values and its plans for the strategic development as a leader in modern social processes. The analysis of interpretations of globalization in the works of Wang Zhengyi, Cai Tuo, Zhang Yihao and Chen Liuqing, Zheng Yiming and Zhang Chaoying allowed the author to trace the dialectical connection of economic and political ideas, which helps to substantiate the place of the Chinese economy in the context of globalization. Clarification of the features of the identification of cultural globalization by Wen Jun, Liu Huanming, Feng Jianjun and Li Deng allowed for the grounds for identifying China as a leader in building a harmonious world based on cultural diversity to be determined. Cultural globalization is interpreted as a supranational process of diversity in unity and unity in diversity, where China's role consists in harmonizing interaction. In turn, cultural globalization is understood as a consequence of the influence of globalization processes on the culture of China itself, which requires significant efforts to change the value content of borrowed ideas and concepts.
About the Author
Hong ZhaoChina
Zhao Hong — PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy
3050, Kaixun Street, Kuan city district, Changchun City, Jilin Prov., 130052 (China)
References
1. Artashkina, T. A. and Hu, Y. L. (2015) ‘The specificity of the interaction of chinese and western cultures in the context of sociocultural globalization’, Teoria i praktika obŝestvenogo razvitiâ, (8), pp. 170–176. (In Russian).
2. Bao, Y. and Pan, S. (2015) ‘Differences-seeking Approach in Qualitative Method and Its Theoretical Foundation’, Sociological Review of China, 3(2), pp. 89–96. (In Chinese).
3. Borisenko, O. et al. (2018) ‘Problems of economic globalization of China as a factor of cultural security’, in MATEC Web of Conferences. Vol. 2012. Les Ulis: EDP Sciences, p. 08026. https://doi.org/10.1051/ matecconf/201821208026
4. Cai, T. (2002b) ‘Wénhuà de quánqiú huà jí qí duì guójì guānxì de yǐngxiǎng [The globalization of culture and its impact on international relations]’, International Politics, (1), pp. 46–51. (In Chinese).
5. Cai, T. (2002а) ‘Quánqiú huà rèn zhī de sì dà lǐlùn zhēngjié [Four major theoretical problems in understanding globalization]’, Jiaoxue yu yanjiu, (3), pp. 29–36. (In Chinese).
6. Fan, Z. (2020) ‘Kitay i Rossiya kul’tura v usloviyakh tsifrovoy globalizatsii: osobennosti tsifrovizatsii art-rynka [China and Russia in the Context of Cultural Globalization: Features of the Digitalization of the Art Market]’, in Global’nyye sotsial’nyye protsessy 2.0: transformatsiya sotsial’noy real’nosti v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii i pandemii [Global Social Processes 2.0: Transformation of Social Reality in the Context of Digitalization and Pandemic]. Saint Petersburg: Tsentr nauchno-informatsionnykh tekhnologiy Asterion Publ., pp. 146–150. (In Russian).
7. Fomina, M. N. and Borisenko, O.A. (2018) ‘Thinking about transcultural space as a reflection of globalizing culture’, Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, 0(1), pp. 105–113. (In Russian). https://doi. org/10.24833/2541-8831-2018-1-5-105-113
8. Li, D. (2008) ‘ The Prospect of Cultural Globalization and Constructing of Harmonious World’, Journal of Renmin University of China, (1), pp. 105–111. (In Chinese).
9. Morozova, V. S. (2019) ‘From the “Global Village” to the “Community of Shared Future for Mankind” – Trends of Cultural Globalization’, in Rossiya — Kitay: dialog v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Russia China: Dialogue in the Context of Globalization]. Chita: Zabaykal’skiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., pp. 130– 135. (In Russian).
10. Qingzho, C. and Nurtazinab, R. A. (2023) ‘Globalization and Chinese Culture (Based on the Works of Chinese Scientists)’, Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics, 17(3), pp. 179–187. (In Russian). https://doi. org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-03-179-187
11. Shogenova, L. A., Astafyeva, O. N. and Ventsel, S. V. (2017) ‘Globalisation impact on chinese culture’, State and municipal management. Scholar notes, (4), pp. 151–155. (In Russian).
12. Tszya, S. (2018) ‘The Chinese cultural policy and industry in the context of globalization’, Vek globalizatsii, (2), pp. 101–114. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30884/vglob/2018.02.08
13. Wang, Z. (ed.) (2023) Fan si quan qiu hua : li lun . li shi yu qu shi [Rethinking globalization: theories, histories and prospects]. Beijing: She hui ke xue wen xian chu ban she Publ. (In Chinese).
14. Wen, J. (2021) ‘From “Structure-oriented” to “Relationship-oriented”:Reconstructing the Globalization Theory Facing an Era of Uncertainty’, Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science), (5), pp. 159–173. (In Chinese).
15. Xia, J. (2009) ‘A Comment of the Essentials of the Diversity and Unity of Contemporary World Culture’, Journal of Changsha University of Science & Technology(Social Science), (3), pp. 90–94. (In Chinese).
16. Zhang, S. (2000). ‘What is globalization?’, Europe, No. 1, рр. 23–27. (In Chinese).
17. Zhang, Y. and Chen, L. (2004) ‘Rereading on Theories of Economic Globalization’, Journal of China University of Geosciences. Social Sciences Edition, 4(6), pp. 34–38. (In Chinese).
18. Zhao, H. (2022) ‘Chinese researchers on cultural diversity in the globalization space’, KANT, 44(3), pp. 173–176. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24923/2222-243X.2022-44.31
Review
For citations:
Zhao H. From the Theory of Globalization to the Theory of Cultural Globalization: The Theoretical Search of Chinese Philosophers. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2024;8(4):22-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2024-4-32-22-36