GENERAL AND CULTURALLY-VARIABLE METAPHORS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM

The author studies metaphors used in the antiterrorist discourse. Metaphor is viewed upon not only as a means of nominating reality but is also analyzed from the perspective of having influence on the individual’s way of thinking. The assumption is made that metaphors can create new reality. Considering the fact that one of the most significant concepts of modern society is “terrorism” the author studies some metaphors used by mass media in the context of the war on terrorism. Operating on the premise, that metaphorical system of the language reflects those values that are characteristic of the culture, which uses this language for communication, the author divides metaphors into general (“war”, “common enemy”) and culturally-variable (“business”, “brand”,“sport” etc.). The author looks into the system of implications that develops with the representatives of some culture when a certain metaphor is used. The reasons for the cultural diversity of metaphors are connected with a wide range of factors: political, historical, climatic. For example, it is common knowledge that in the USA a lot of attention is paid to sports, which finds its reflection in the following metaphors: “Political leaders are dropping the ball on terrorism”; “…We are facing one of the most serious threats to our national security in the history of this country…and ... what did we do? We took our eyes off the ball”; “Tech giants team up against terrorism”. In the article the author gives examples of metaphors in the Russian, English and French languages.

Metaphor, language, terrorism, society, social phenomenon, conflict, war, common enemy

1. Блэк М. Метафора // Теория метафоры / Общ. ред. Н.Д. Арутюновой и М.А. Журинской. М.: Прогресс, 1990. С. 153-172.

2. Будаев Э.В., Чудинов А.П. Методологические грани политической метафорологии // Политическая лингвистика. 2007. №21. С. 22-31.

3. Лакофф Дж., Джонсон М. Метафоры, которыми мы живем / Пер. с англ. / Под ред. и с предисл. А.Н. Баранова. М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2004. 256 с.

4. Полит.ру. Изложение выступления премьер-министра Путина в Государственной Думе. 14.09.1999 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://polit.ru/article/1999/09/14/578442/ (дата обращения: 06.12.2016).

5. РИА Новости. Интервью Президента Владимира Путина французской телекомпании «Франс-3», 2003. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://ria.ru/politics/20030209/315929.html (дата обращения: 19.11.2016).

6. Сусык С. Ю. Реализация концепта “ТЕРРОРИЗМ” в дискурсе печатных средств массовой информации: дис. ... канд. филол. наук. Челябинск, 2008. 206 с.

7. BusinessFM Террористы готовили для России парижский сценарий. 13.11.2016 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.bfm.ru/news/338650 (дата обращения: 06.12.2016).

8. Feingold R. Congressional Record: Proceedings and debates of the 108th Congress second session. Vol. 150. Pt. 5. March 31. 2004. 6960 p.

9. McCue J. Terrorism is a failed brand // TED Talk. June 2012. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.ted.com/talks/jason_mccue_terrorism_is_a_failed_brand (дата обращения: 06.12.2016).

10. Patten S. Political leaders are dropping the ball on terrorism // Breitbart. 27.07.2016. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/07/27/sam-patten-political-leaders-are-dropping-the-ball-on-terrorism (дата обращения: 06.12.2016).

11. Peritz A. New York and Minnesota show how DIY terrorism is the new normal. 19.09.2016 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/19/diy-terrorism-new-normal-new-york-minnesota (дата обращения: 06.12.2016).

12. Tech giants team up against terrorism // Third Parent. 06.12.2016. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://blog.thirdparent.com/tech-giants-team-up-against-terrorism (дата обращения: 06.12.2016).

13. Vijay Prashad. Le retour en force des talibans // Afghanistan Times. 27.10.2016 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.courrierinternational.com/article/afghanistan-le-retour-en-force-des-talibans (дата обращения: 05.12.2016) (In French).