Site Emperor Qing Begging Immortality (Qinhuangdao City) from the Perspective of Representing Chinese Cultural Identity

The relevance of renewing national identity images and integrating them within the patchwork of globalization is closely related with the heightened interest in intercultural communication in times of so-called social turbulence. This study aims to describe a model of representation of Chinese cultural identity using the example of the park named Site Emperor Qing Begging Immortality in Qinhuangdao. To achieve this several tasks were undertaken: firstly, to analyze the main tendencies of the construction of the ideology of state development of the PRC in the context of globalization; secondly, to 

describe the objective and cultural-semiotic structure of the Park in light of the Sinicization trend, i.e. the focus on the awareness and manifestation of Chinese specificity; thirdly, to establish the semantic components that link the objects of the park into a coherent whole and to restore the narrative that links modern ideology with historical and memorial reconstructions. The material for the study are both the very objects within the park on the one hand and literature on the formation of modern Chinese identity on the other. Using a communicative approach, memorial studies, and understanding architecture as a text and images as a semantic medium, the authors analyze the main interpretations of the Sinicization trend and the park as an example of modern landscape architecture. This includes its key components, such as the layout, sculptures, reliefs referring to the historical evidence and cultural phenomena, as well as determine their role in today’s Chinese society. As a result, it is substantiated that Chinese cultural identity appeals to historical memory in conjunction with spatial structures and images. The park is thematically dedicated to the Era of the Warring States (Zhanguo), the creation of the first Chinese Empire, as well as the search for immortality. It reproduces significant components of cultural identity such as the value of a strong unified state, including being a maritime power, the importance of education, traditional teachings (Confucianism, Taoism, Yin-yang), language, poetry, technology of administrative management, military art and medicine, and a striving for longevity. The formation of these values in the designated historical period is emphasized. The transformation of the idea of physical immortality into a modern symbol of determination, perseverance and exploration of the unknown is noteworthy.

1. Anderson, B. (1991) Imagined communities : reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso. (Russ. ed.: (2001) Voobrazaemye soobscestva : razmyslenija ob istokach i rasprostranenii nacionalizma. Moscow: KANON-Press-C Publ.).

2. Chen, Y. and Fomina, M. N. (2022) ‘Zheng Xiaoyun`s Theory of Cultural Identity’, Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, 6(3), pp. 7–21. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-3-23-7-21

3. Inishev, I. (2011) ‘Prostranstvennost’ obraznosti [Spatiality of imagery]’, Topos, (1), pp. 116–125. (In Russian).

4. Koshevyi, S. A. (2014) ‘Features of Development of Ancient China during the Warring States’, Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, (11–12), pp. 34–40. (In Russian).

5. Lisenkova, A. A. (2022) ‘ Tsennostno-smyslovyye osnovaniya formirovaniya rossiyskoy sotsiokul’turnoy identichnosti [Value-semantic foundations for the formation of Russian socio-cultural identity]’, in Grazhdanstvennost’. Kul’tura. Religiya [Citizenship. Culture. Religion]. Perm: Permskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., pp. 13–24. (In Russian).

6. Luhmann, N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Zweiter Teilband. Kapitel 4-5. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Russ. Ed.: (2011) Obshchestvo obshchestva. Kn. 4-5: Differentsiatsiya. Samoopisaniya. Moscow: Logos).

7. Medvedeva, E. V. (2022) ‘ From Garden-City Concept to Park-City Concept: using the Urban Metaphor in the Text of the City’, Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, (1), pp. 68–78. (In Russian).

8. Peng, C. (2011) ‘Historical and philosophical context of the formation of the yun-gong-diao modal system ’, The Actual problems of high musical education, (4), pp. 4–11. (In Russian).

9. Revzin, G. (2019) Kak ustroyen gorod [How the city is arranged]. Moscow: Strelka Press. (In Russian).

10. Semenenko, I. S. (2023a) ‘Identichnost’ kak resurs obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Identity as a resource for social development]’, in Identichnost: Lichnost, obshchestvo, politika. Novye konturi issledovatelskogo polya [Identity: The Individual, Society, and Politics. New Outlines of the Research Field]. Moscow: Ves mir Publ., pp. 18–26. (In Russian).

11. Semenenko, I. S. (2023b) ‘Vvedeniye. Identichnost’ v meynstrime politicheskoy nauki i v fokuse publichnoy politiki [Introduction: Identity in the Mainstream of Political Science and in the Focus of Public Policy]’, in Identichnost: Lichnost, obshchestvo, politika. Novye konturi issledovatelskogo polya [Identity: The Individual, Society, and Politics. New Outlines of the Research Field]. Moscow: Ves mir Publ., pp. 9–16. (In Russian).

12. Silantieva, M. V. and Glagolev, V. S. (2024) ‘Moral Paradoxes of the Age of Turbulence’, Concept:

13. philosophy, religion, culture, 8(1), pp. 160–162. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2024-1-29160-162

14. Solodovnikova, O. N. (2023) Iskusstvo Kitaya [Art of China]. Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russian).

15. Vasiliev, L. S. (1995) Drevniy Kitay. T.1. Predystoriya, Shan-In’, Zapadnoye Chzhou (do VIII v. do n. e.) [Ancient China. Vol. 1. Prehistory, Shang-Yin, Western Zhou (before the 8th century BC)]. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura Publ. (In Russian).

16. Vasiliev, L.S. (2001) Kul’ty, religii, traditsii v Kitaye [Cults, religions, traditions in China]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura Publ. (In Russian).

17. Vinogradova, N.A. (2010) Kitay, Koreya, Yaponiya: obraz mira v iskusstve [China, Korea, Japan: the image of the world in art]. Moscow: Progress-traditsiya Publ. (In Russian).

18. Wu, P. (2019) ‘Semantics of red color designation within Chinese and Russian languacultures’, Litera, (6), pp. 137–146. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2019.6.31474

19. Zheng, X. (1992) Wen hua ren tong lun[Cultural Identity Theory]. Beijing: Zhong guo she hui kexue chu ban she Publ.(In Chinese).

20. Zuenko, I. Yu. (2024) Polden’, XXI vek: Kitay v epokhu Si TSzin’pina [Noon, XXI century: China in the era of Xi Jinping]. Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russian).